skip to main content
10.1145/2839462.2839494acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesteiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

ReFlex: A Flexible Smartphone with Active Haptic Feedback for Bend Input

Authors Info & Claims
Published:14 February 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

ReFlex is a flexible smartphone with bend input and active haptic feedback. ReFlex's features allow the introduction of sensations such as friction or resistance. We report results from an experiment using ReFlex in a targeting task, as well as initial users' reactions to the prototype. We explore both absolute and relative tactile haptic feedback, paired with two types of bend input mappings: position-control and rate-control. We observed that position-controlled cursors paired well with relative bend feedback, while rate-controlled cursors paired well with absolute bend feedback to indicate targets. We also explored an eyes-free condition. Results suggest that while eyes-free, haptic feedback conditions were more error-prone than visual-only conditions, the size of the error was relatively small, and users were able to complete the task in all cases. We present two application scenarios that take advantage of the unique input and output modalities of ReFlex and discuss its potential for within document navigation.

References

  1. Motoyuki Akamatsu, I. Scott MacKenzie, and Thierry Hasbrouc. 1995. A comparison of tactile, auditory, and visual feedback in a pointing task using a mouse-type device. Ergonomics 38: 816--827.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Olivier Bau, Ivan Poupyrev, Ali Israr, and Chris Harrison. 2010. TeslaTouch: electrovibration for touch surfaces. In Proceedings of the 23nd annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology (UIST '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 283--292. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Frank Biocca, Jin Kim, and Yung Choi. 2011. Visual Touch in Virtual Environments: An Exploratory Study of Presence, Multi-Modal Interfaces, and Cross-Modal Sensory Illusions. Presence, 10: 247--265. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Nicholas Chen, Francois Guimbretiere, Morgan Dixon, Cassandra Lewis, and Maneesh Agrawala. 2008. Navigation techniques for dual-display e-book readers. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1779--1788. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Clifton Forlines and Ravin Balakrishnan. 2008. Evaluating tactile feedback and direct vs. indirect stylus input in pointing and crossing selection tasks. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1563--1572. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Audrey Girouard, Aneesh Tarun, and Roel Vertegaal. 2012. DisplayStacks: interaction techniques for stacks of flexible thin-film displays. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2431--2440. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Chris Harrison, Zhiquan Yeo, and Scott E. Hudson. 2010. Faster progress bars: manipulating perceived duration with visual augmentations. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1545--1548. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Masaharu Hirose, Karin Iwazaki, Kozue Nojiri, Minato Takeda, Yuta Sugiura, and Masahiko Inami. 2015. Gravitamine spice: a system that changes the perception of eating through virtual weight sensation. In Proceedings of the 6th Augmented Human International Conference (AH '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 33--40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. David Holman and Roel Vertegaal. 2008. Organic user interfaces: designing computers in any way, shape, or form. Commun. ACM 51, 6 (June 2008), 48--55. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Johan Kildal. 2010. 3D-press: haptic illusion of compliance when pressing on a rigid surface. In International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces and the Workshop on Machine Learning for Multimodal Interaction (ICMI-MLMI '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 21, 8 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Johan Kildal, Susanna Paasovaara, and Viljakaisa Aaltonen. 2012. Kinetic device: designing interactions with a deformable mobile interface. In CHI '12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1871--1876. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Johan Kildal and Graham Wilson. 2012. Feeling it: the roles of stiffness, deformation range and feedback in the control of deformable ui. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM international conference on Multimodal interaction (ICMI '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 393--400. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Roberta L. Klatzky and Susan J. Lederman. 2006. The perceived roughness of resistive virtual textures: I. rendering by a force-feedback mouse. ACM Trans. Appl. Percept. 3, 1 (January 2006), 1--14. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Byron Lahey, Audrey Girouard, Winslow Burleson, and Roel Vertegaal. 2011. PaperPhone: understanding the use of bend gestures in mobile devices with flexible electronic paper displays. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1303--1312. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Susan J. Lederman and Lynette A. Jones. 2011. Tactile and Haptic Illusions. IEEE Transactions on Haptics 4, 4: 273--294. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Catherine C. Marshall and Sara Bly. 2005. Turning the page on navigation. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries (JCDL '05). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 225--234. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Yusuke Nakagawa, Akiya Kamimura, and Yoichiro Kawaguchi. 2012. MimicTile: a variable stiffness deformable user interface for mobile devices. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 745--748. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Donald Norman. 1988. The Psychology of Everyday Things. Basic Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Kenton O'Hara and Abigail Sellen. 1997. A comparison of reading paper and on-line documents. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human factors in computing systems (CHI '97). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 335--342. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Omega Engineering. Strain Gages. 2015. http://www.omega.ca/guides/straingages.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Joseph D. Rutledge and Ted Selker. 1990. Force-to-motion functions for pointing. In Proceedings of the IFIP TC13 Third International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (INTERACT '90), Dan Diaper, David J. Gilmore, Gilbert Cockton, and Brian Shackel (Eds.). North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, The Netherlands, 701--706. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Carsten Schwesig, Ivan Poupyrev, and Eijiro Mori. 2004. Gummi: a bendable computer. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '04). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 263--270. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. M.A. Srinivasan, G.L. Beauregard, and D.L. Brock. The Impact of Visual Information on the Haptic Perception of Stiffness in Virtual Environments. In Proceedings of ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Division (1996), 58. 555--559.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Tactile Labs. Hapuator Mark II. 2012. http://www.tactilelabs.com/products/haptics/haptuator-mark-ii-v2/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Hsin-yun Yao and Vincent Hayward. 2006. An experiment on length perception with a virtual rolling stone. In Proceedings of EuroHaptics 2006. Springer-Verlag, 325--330.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Shumin Zhai. 1995. Human Performance in Six Degree of Freedom Input Control. Ph.D Dissertation. University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. ReFlex: A Flexible Smartphone with Active Haptic Feedback for Bend Input

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      TEI '16: Proceedings of the TEI '16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction
      February 2016
      820 pages
      ISBN:9781450335829
      DOI:10.1145/2839462

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 14 February 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      TEI '16 Paper Acceptance Rate45of178submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate393of1,367submissions,29%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader