skip to main content
10.1145/2839462.2839487acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesteiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The Aesthetics of Heat: Guiding Awareness with Thermal Stimuli

Authors Info & Claims
Published:14 February 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper we discuss the design process and results from a design exploration on the use of thermal stimuli in body awareness exercises. A user-study was performed on an interactive prototype in the form of an interactive heat mat. The paper brings forth an alternative understanding of heat as a design material that extends the common understanding of thermal stimuli in HCI as a communication modality to instead bring the aesthetic and experiential properties to the fore. Findings account for felt body experiences of thermal stimuli and a number of design qualities related to heat as a design material are formulated, pointing to experiential qualities concerning the felt body, subjectivity and subtleness as well as material qualities concerning materiality, inertia and heat transfer.

References

  1. Ian Darian-Smith and Kenneth O. Johnson. 1977. Thermal sensibility and thermoreceptors. Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 69, 146--153.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Povl Ove Fanger. 1973. Assessment of man's thermal comfort in practice. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 30, pp. 313--324.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Moshe Feldenkrais. 1991. Awareness Through Movement: Easy-to-Do Health Exercises to Improve Your Posture, Vision, Imagination, and Personal Awareness. HarperCollins.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Frank Feltham, Lian Loke, Elise van den Hoven, Jeffrey Hannam, and Bert Bongers. 2014. The slow floor: increasing creative agency while walking on an interactive surface. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction (TEI '14). 105-112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2540930.2540974 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Ylva Fernaeus, Jakob Tholander and Martin Jonsson. 2008. Beyond representations: towards an action-centric perspective on tangible interaction. International Journal of Arts and Technology. 1, 249--267.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. William Gaver. 2012. What should we expect from research through design?. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12). 937-946. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208538 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Elisa Giaccardi and Elvin Karana. 2015. Foundations of Materials Experience: An Approach for HCI. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). 2447-2456. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702337 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Martin Halvey, Graham Wilson, Stephen A. Brewster, and Stephen A. Hughes. 2013. Perception of thermal stimuli for continuous interaction. In CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '13). 1587-1592. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2468356.2468640 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Martin Halvey, Graham Wilson, Yolanda Vazquez-Alvarez, Stephen A. Brewster, and Stephen A. Hughes. 2011. The effect of clothing on thermal feedback perception. In Proceedings of the 13th international conference on multimodal interfaces (ICMI '11). 217-220. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2070481.2070519 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Kristina Höök. 2010. Transferring qualities from horseback riding to design. In Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries (NordiCHI '10). 226-235. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1868914.1868943 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Katherine Isbister, Kristina Höök, Michael Sharp, and Jarmo Laaksolahti. 2006. The sensual evaluation instrument: developing an affective evaluation tool. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '06). 1163-1172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1124772.1124946 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Lynette A. Jones and Michal Berris. 2002. The psychophysics of temperature perception and thermal-interface design. In Proc 10th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems. 137--142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/HAPTIC.2002.998951 Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Scott R. Klemmer, Björn Hartmann, and Leila Takayama. 2006. How bodies matter: five themes for interaction design. In Proceedings of the 6th conference on Designing Interactive systems (DIS '06). 140-149. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1142405.1142429 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Wonjun Lee and Youn-kyung Lim. 2010. Thermomessage: exploring the potential of heat as a modality of peripheral expression. In CHI '10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '10). 4231-4236. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1753846.1754131 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Youn-kyung Lim, Erik Stolterman, Heekyoung Jung, and Justin Donaldson. 2007. Interaction gestalt and the design of aesthetic interactions. In Proceedings of the 2007 conference on Designing pleasurable products and interfaces (DPPI '07). 239-254. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1314161.1314183 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Boon Lay Ong. 2012. Warming up to Heat. The Senses and Society. 7(1). 5--21.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Pau Waelder Laso. 2007. Games of Pain: Pain as Haptic Stimulation in Computer-Game---Based Media Art. Leonardo 40, 3, 238--242. http://doi.org/10.1162/leon.2007.40.3.238Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Hendrik Richter, Doris Hausen, Sven Osterwald, and Andreas Butz. 2012. Reproducing materials of virtual elements on touchscreens using supplemental thermal feedback. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM international conference on Multimodal interaction (ICMI '12). 385-392. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2388676.2388765 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Katri Salminen, Veikko Surakka, Jukka Raisamo, Jani Lylykangas, Johannes Pystynen, Roope Raisamo, Kalle Mäkelä, and Teemu Ahmaniemi. 2011. Emotional responses to thermal stimuli. In Proceedings of the 13th international conference on multimodal interfaces (ICMI '11). 193-196. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2070481.2070513 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Thecla Schiphorst. 2009. soft(n): toward a somaesthetics of touch. In CHI '09 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '09). 2427-2438. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1520340.1520345 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Shusterman, Richard. 2008. Body Consciousness: A Philosophy of Mindfulness and Somaesthetics. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Jakob Tholander and Carolina Johansson. 2010. Design qualities for whole body interaction: learning from golf, skateboarding and BodyBugging. In Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries (NordiCHI '10). 493-502. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1868914.1868970 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Konrad Tollmar, Stefan Junestrand, and Olle Torgny. 2000. Virtually living together. In Proceedings of the 3rd conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques (DIS '00). 83-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/347642.347670 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Anna Vallgårda. 2013. Giving form to computational things: developing a practice of interaction design. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing. 18, 3. 577--592. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Graham Wilson, Gavin Davidson, and Stephen A. Brewster. 2015. In the Heat of the Moment: Subjective Interpretations of Thermal Feedback During Interaction. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). 2063-2072. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702219 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Graham Wilson, Martin Halvey, Stephen A. Brewster, and Stephen A. Hughes. 2011. Some like it hot: thermal feedback for mobile devices. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11). 2555-2564. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979316 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. The Aesthetics of Heat: Guiding Awareness with Thermal Stimuli

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      TEI '16: Proceedings of the TEI '16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction
      February 2016
      820 pages
      ISBN:9781450335829
      DOI:10.1145/2839462

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 14 February 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      TEI '16 Paper Acceptance Rate45of178submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate393of1,367submissions,29%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader