skip to main content
10.1145/2838739.2838801acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesozchiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Everybody Dance Now: Tensions between Participation and Performance in Interactive Public Installations

Authors Info & Claims
Published:07 December 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we report on Encounters, an interactive public installation that provides a basis for studying the effect of dance performances on the emergence of creative, social experiences. Based on observations and interviews with dancers and participants, we identified a range of tensions that arise from integrating a staged performance with participatory interaction. These tensions occurred among both participants and performers, and influenced the social and performative experience. Based on our analysis, we propose several strategies to smoothen the integration of performative and participatory interaction. These strategies reconsider the role of the interactive installation, the effect of digital cues that draw on existing conventions, and mechanisms to direct gaze. We believe our findings and strategies are valuable to HCI researchers and performative artists seeking to design for public participation in interactive experiences.

References

  1. Bedwell, B., and Caruana, T. Encouraging Spectacle to Create Self-sustaining Interactions at Public Displays. In Proc. PerDis '12, ACM (2012) 15:1--15:6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Dalsgaard, P., and Hansen, L. K. Performing Perception: Staging Aesthetics of Interaction. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 15, 3 (2008) 13:1--13:33. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Erkut, C., and Rajala-Erkut, A. Beyond Command & Control: Sketching Embodied Interaction. In Ext. Abstracts CHI 2015, ACM (2015) 1681--1686. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Fdili Alaoui, S., Jacquemin, C., and Bevilacqua, F. Chiseling Bodies: An Augmented Dance Performance. In Ext. Abstracts CHI 2015, ACM (2013) 2915--2918. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Friederichs-Büttner, G., Walther-Franks, B., and Malaka, R. An Unfinished Drama: Designing Participation for the Theatrical Dance Performance Parcival XX-XI. In Proc. DIS '12, ACM (2012) 770--778. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Griggio, C. F., and Romero, M. Canvas Dance: An Interactive Dance Visualization for Large-Group Interaction. In Ext. Abstracts CHI 2015, ACM (2015) 379--382. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Hespanhol, L., and Tomitsch, M. Designing for Collective Participation with Media Installations in Public Spaces. In Proc. MAB 2012, ACM (2012) 33--42. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Holmer, H. B., DiSalvo, C., Sengers, P., and Lodato, T. Constructing and constraining participation in participatory arts and HCI. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 74 (2015) 107--123.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Hook, J., Clarke, R., McCarthy, J., Anderson, K., Dudman, J., and Wright, P. Making the Invisible Visible: Design to Support the Documentation of Participatory Arts Experiences. In Proc. CHI 2015, ACM (2015) 2583--2592. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Jung, D., Jensen, M. H., Laing, S., and Mayall, J. Cyclic.: An Interactive Performance Combining Dance, Graphics, Music and Kinect-technology. In Proc. CHINZ 2012, ACM (2012) 36--43. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Loke, L., and Robertson, T. J. Studies of dancers: Moving from experience to interaction design. International Journal of Design 4, 2 (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. McCarthy, J. J., and Wright, P. Taking {A}part: The Politics and Aesthetics of Participation in Experience-Centered Design. MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Oppermann, L., Putschli, C., Brosda, C., Lobunets, O., and Prioville, F. The Smartphone Project: An Augmented Dance Performance. In Proc. CHI 2015, ACM (2015) 2569--2572. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Reeves, S. A Framework for Designing Interfaces in Public Settings. In Designing Interfaces in Public Settings. Springer London, (2011), 141--175.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Savage, G. J., and Officer, J. M. CHOREO: an interactive computer model for dance. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 10, 3 (1978) 233--250.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Schiphorst, T., Calvert, T., Lee, C., Welman, C., and Gaudet, S. Tools for Interaction with the Creative Process of Composition. In Proc. CHI 1990, ACM (1990) 167--174. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Everybody Dance Now: Tensions between Participation and Performance in Interactive Public Installations

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        OzCHI '15: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Australian Special Interest Group for Computer Human Interaction
        December 2015
        691 pages
        ISBN:9781450336734
        DOI:10.1145/2838739

        Copyright © 2015 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 7 December 2015

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • short-paper
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        OzCHI '15 Paper Acceptance Rate47of97submissions,48%Overall Acceptance Rate362of729submissions,50%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader