skip to main content
research-article

Enabling Context-Aware Indoor Augmented Reality via Smartphone Sensing and Vision Tracking

Published:21 October 2015Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Augmented reality (AR) aims to render the world that users see and overlay information that reflects the real physical dynamics. The digital view could be potentially projected near the Point-of-Interest (POI) in a way that makes the virtual view attached to the POI even when the camera moves. Achieving smooth support for movements is a subject of extensive studies. One of the key problems is where the augmented information should be added to the field of vision in real time. Existing solutions either leverage GPS location for rendering outdoor AR views (hundreds of kilometers away) or rely on image markers for small-scale presentation (only for the marker region). To realize AR applications under various scales and dynamics, we propose a suite of algorithms for fine-grained AR view tracking to improve the accuracy of attitude and displacement estimation, reduce the drift, eliminate the marker, and lower the computation cost. Instead of requiring extremely high, accurate, absolute locations, we propose multimodal solutions according to mobility levels without additional hardware requirement. Experimental results demonstrate significantly less error in projecting and tracking the AR view. These results are expected to make users excited to explore their surroundings with enriched content.

References

  1. Apple. 2014. CMAttitude Class Reference. https://developer.apple.com/library/ios/documentation/CoreMotion/Reference/CMAttitude_Class/Reference/Reference.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Ronald Azuma, Yohan Baillot, Reinhold Behringer, Steven Feiner, Simon Julier, and Blair MacIntyre. 2001. Recent advances in augmented reality. Comput. Graph. Appl. 21, 6, 34--47. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. BSD license. 2014. OpenCV. (2014). http://opencv.org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Manmohan Krishna Chandraker, Christoph Stock, and Axel Pinz. 2003. Real-Time Camera Pose in a Room. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bas des Bouvrie. 2011. Improving RGBD indoor mapping with IMU data. Ph.D., Dissertation, Masters thesis, Delft University of Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Friedrich Fraundorfer and Davide Scaramuzza. 2012. Visual odometry: Part II: Matching, robustness, optimization, and applications. IEEE Robotics & Automation Mag. 19, 2, 78--90.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Blippar Group. 2014. Layar. https://www.layar.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Richard Hartley and Andrew Zisserman. 2003. Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision. Cambridge University Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. J. D. Hol. 2011. Sensor fusion and calibration of inertial sensors, vision, Ultra-Wideband and GPS. Linköping Studies in Science and Technology. Dissertations 1368.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Myung Hwangbo, Jun-Sik Kim, and Takeo Kanade. 2009. Inertial-aided KLT feature tracking for a moving camera. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2009). IEEE, 1909--1916. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Hirokazu Kato. 2002. ARToolKit: Library for vision-based augmented reality. Technical Report, IEICE PRMU, 101 (652), 79--86.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Bernd Kitt, Andreas Geiger, and Henning Lategahn. 2010. Visual odometry based on stereo image sequences with ransac-based outlier rejection scheme. In Proceedings of the Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV). IEEE, 486--492.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Tobias Langlotz, Claus Degendorfer, Alessandro Mulloni, Gerhard Schall, Gerhard Reitmayr, and Dieter Schmalstieg. 2011. Robust detection and tracking of annotations for outdoor augmented reality browsing. Comput. Graph. 35, 4, 831--840. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Patrick Lazik and Anthony Rowe. 2012. Indoor pseudo-ranging of mobile devices using ultrasonic chirps. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Embedded Network Sensor Systems. ACM, 99--112. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Hongbo Liu, Yu Gan, Jie Yang, Simon Sidhom, Yan Wang, Yingying Chen, and Fan Ye. 2012. Push the limit of WiFi based localization for smartphones. In Proceedings of the 18th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking. ACM, 305--316. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Kaikai Liu, Xinxin Liu, and Xiaolin Li. 2013. Guoguo: Enabling fine-grained indoor localization via smartphone. In Proceedings of the 11th Annual International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services. ACM, 235--248. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Justin Gregory Manweiler, Puneet Jain, and Romit Roy Choudhury. 2012. Satellites in our pockets: An object positioning system using smartphones. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services. ACM, 211--224. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. F. Landis Markley and John L. Crassidis. 2014. Fundamentals of Spacecraft Attitude Determination and Control. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Lorenz Meier, Petri Tanskanen, Lionel Heng, Gim Hee Lee, Friedrich Fraundorfer, and Marc Pollefeys. 2012. PIXHAWK: A micro aerial vehicle design for autonomous flight using onboard computer vision. Autonom. Robots 33, 1--2, 21--39. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Mixare. 2011. mix Augmented Reality Engine. http://www.mixare.org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Alessandro Mulloni, Daniel Wagner, Istvan Barakonyi, and Dieter Schmalstieg. 2009. Indoor positioning and navigation with camera phones. Pervas. Comput. 8, 2, 22--31. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. R. Nandakumar, K. K. Chintalapudi, and V. N. Padmanabhan. 2012. Centaur: locating devices in an office environment. In Proceedings of the 18th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking. ACM, 281--292. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Rob Napier and Mugunth Kumar. 2014. iOS 7 Programming Pushing the Limits. Wiley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Joseph Newman, David Ingram, and Andy Hopper. 2001. Augmented reality in a wide area sentient environment. In Proceedings. IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Augmented Reality, 2001. IEEE, 77--86. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. William Russell Pensyl, Daniel Keith Jernigan, Tran Cong Thien Qui, Hsin Pei Fang, and Lee Shang Ping. 2008. Large area robust hybrid tracking with life-size avatar in mixed reality environment: For cultural and historical installation. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGGRAPH International Conference on Virtual-Reality Continuum and Its Applications in Industry. ACM, 9. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Qualcomm. 2015. Vuforia. https://www.qualcomm.com/products/vuforia.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Pavel Rajmic. 2005. Method for real-time signal processing via wavelet transform. Nonlin. Anal. Algor. Speech Process. 368--378. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Miguel Ribo, Markus Brandner, and Axel Pinz. 2004. A flexible software architecture for hybrid tracking. J. Robot. Syst. 21, 2, 53--62. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Ethan Rublee, Vincent Rabaud, Kurt Konolige, and Gary Bradski. 2011. ORB: An efficient alternative to SIFT or SURF. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). IEEE, 2564--2571. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Guobin Shen, Zhuo Chen, Peichao Zhang, Thomas Moscibroda, and Yongguang Zhang. 2013. Walkie-markie: Indoor pathway mapping made easy. In Proceedings of the 10th USENIX Conference on Networked Systems Design and Implementation. USENIX Association, 85--98. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. D. W. F. Van Krevelen and R. Poelman. 2010. A survey of augmented reality technologies, applications and limitations. Int. J. Virt. Real. 9, 2, 1.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Daniel Wagner, Gerhard Reitmayr, Alessandro Mulloni, Tom Drummond, and Dieter Schmalstieg. 2010. Real-time detection and tracking for augmented reality on mobile phones. IEEE Trans. Visual. Comput. Graph. 16, 3, 355--368. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. He Wang, Souvik Sen, Ahmed Elgohary, Moustafa Farid, Moustafa Youssef, and Romit Roy Choudhury. 2012. No need to war-drive: Unsupervised indoor localization. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services. ACM, 197--210. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Zac White. 2012. iPhone-AR-Toolkit. https://github.com/nielswh/iPhone-AR-Toolkit.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Roni Yadlin. 2009. Attitude determination and bias estimation using kalman filtering. US Air Force Academy Report.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Zheng Yang, Chenshu Wu, and Yunhao Liu. 2012. Locating in fingerprint space: Wireless indoor localization with little human intervention. In Proceedings of the 18th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking. ACM, 269--280. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Pengfei Zhou, Mo Li, and Guobin Shen. 2014. Use it free: Instantly knowing your phone attitude. In Proceedings of ACM MobiCom 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Enabling Context-Aware Indoor Augmented Reality via Smartphone Sensing and Vision Tracking

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications
        ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications  Volume 12, Issue 1s
        Special Issue on Smartphone-Based Interactive Technologies, Systems, and Applications and Special Issue on Extended Best Papers from ACM Multimedia 2014
        October 2015
        317 pages
        ISSN:1551-6857
        EISSN:1551-6865
        DOI:10.1145/2837676
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2015 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 21 October 2015
        • Accepted: 1 July 2015
        • Revised: 1 April 2015
        • Received: 1 January 2015
        Published in tomm Volume 12, Issue 1s

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader