skip to main content
10.1145/2802083.2802093acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesubicompConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

A ball-grid-array-like electronics-to-textile pocket connector for wearable electronics

Published:07 September 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper we introduce and characterize a new type of connector between smart textile and electronic devices. The connector is based on a ball grid array structure which is pressed against conductive textile pads in a stretchable pocket. The connector keeps textile and electronics fabrication separate. It offers 56 connections on an area of 60 × 100mm2, which is about the size of a smart phone. The resistance of the connection is 1.4Ω at DC, mostly constant up to 10 kHz and below 3Ω up to 100 kHz. This resistance is low compared to measured sensor resistances for resistive pressure sensing or bio-impedance sensing.

References

  1. Conductive Hook and Loop Tape (Velcro). (Apr 7, 2015). http://www.adafruit.com/products/1324.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. LilyPad Arduino SimpleSnap. (Apr 7, 2015). https://www.sparkfun.com/products/10941.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Ohmatex washable textile connector. (Apr 7, 2015). http://www.ohmatex.dk/?page_id=101.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Avery, R. Electrical slide fastener connector, Mar. 10 1959. US Patent 2,877,439.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Ermes, M., Parkka, J., Mantyjarvi, J., and Korhonen, I. Detection of daily activities and sports with wearable sensors in controlled and uncontrolled conditions. Information Technology in Biomedicine, IEEE Transactions on 12, 1 (Jan 2008), 20--26. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Hardegger, M., Roggen, D., and Tröster, G. 3d actionslam: Wearable person tracking in multi-floor environments. Personal Ubiquitous Comput. 19, 1 (Jan. 2015), 123--141. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Harms, H., Amft, O., and Tröster, G. Does loose fitting matter?: Predicting sensor performance in smart garments. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Body Area Networks, BodyNets '12 (2012), 1--4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Lehn, D., Neely, C., Schoonover, K., Martin, T., and Jones, M. e-tags: e-textile attached gadgets. In Proceedings of Communication Networks and Distributed Systems: Modeling and Simulation (2004).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Marquez, J. C., Seoane, F., Valimaki, E., and Lindecrantz, K. Textile electrodes in electrical bioimpedance measurements--a comparison with conventional ag/agcl electrodes. In Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. EMBC (2009), 4816--4819.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Mattmann, C., Amft, O., Harms, H., Troster, G., and Clemens, F. Recognizing upper body postures using textile strain sensors. In Wearable Computers, 2007 11th IEEE International Symposium on (Oct 2007), 29--36. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Ohno, H., Narui, F., and Hayashi, S. Zipper-type electrical connector, Mar. 19 1996. US Patent 5,499,927.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Pantelopoulos, A., and Bourbakis, N. A survey on wearable sensor-based systems for health monitoring and prognosis. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C: Applications and Reviews, IEEE Transactions on 40, 1 (Jan 2010), 1--12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Sazonov, E., Fulk, G., Hill, J., Schutz, Y., and Browning, R. Monitoring of posture allocations and activities by a shoe-based wearable sensor. Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Transactions on 58, 4 (April 2011), 983--990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Scheulen, K., Schwarz, A., and Jockenhoevel, S. Reversible contacting of smart textiles with adhesive bonded magnets. In Proceedings of the 2013 International Symposium on Wearable Computers, ISWC '13 (2013), 131--132. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Seager, R. Flexible radio frequency connectors for textile electronics. Electronics Letters 49 (October 2013), 1371--1373(2).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Volino, P., and Magnenat-Thalmann, N. Accurate garment prototyping and simulation. Computer-Aided Design and Applications 2, 5 (2005), 645--654.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Zhou, B., Cheng, J., Sundholm, M., and Lukowicz, P. From smart clothing to smart table cloth: Design and implementation of a large scale, textile pressure matrix sensor. In Architecture of Computing Systems - ARCS. 2014, 159--170. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. A ball-grid-array-like electronics-to-textile pocket connector for wearable electronics

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      ISWC '15: Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers
      September 2015
      223 pages
      ISBN:9781450335782
      DOI:10.1145/2802083

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 September 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate38of196submissions,19%

      Upcoming Conference

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader