skip to main content
10.1145/2781562.2781565acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicecConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Performance Analysis of IEEE 802.21 MIH as a Function of Vertical Handover Using PMIPv6 and F-HMIPv6

Published:03 August 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

Mobile IPv6 is an Internet protocol that supports mobility of hosts, so that each host move and change it's access point does not need to change the IP, but the problem is the handover latency and packet loss due to handover process. In Mobile IPv6 there are two kinds of approaches to the handling of mobility, which is host-based and network-based mobility mobility. In host-based mobile node involvement is needed for communication with the home agent via the network nodes. As with the network-based, mobile nodes are not involved in the process of communication with the home agent, sufficient network nodes are tasked to set it. Heterogonous network conditions that exist at this time there is some coverage of network environments such as WLAN, WiMAX, 3G, LTE. Standard IEEE 802.21 Media Independent Handover Function had been published for arrangements in vertical handover.

In this final simulation conducted to determine the effect of handover on the performance of Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) with Fast Handover for Hierarchical MIPv6 (F-HMIPv6) using MIH 802.21 at 802.11 and 802.16 network environment. The parameters analyzed were handover latency, packet loss, throughput, and delay. In the local domain, PMIPv6 has a 20% better value for handover latency, packet loss, throughput compared to F-HMIPv6.

References

  1. J. Carmona-Murillo, J.-L. González-Sánchez, and I. Guerrero-Robledo. Handover performance analysis in mobile ipv6-a contribution to fast detection movement. In WINSYS, pages 78--81, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. L.-H. Chang, C.-C. Wang, and T.-H. Lee. A handover mechanism using ieee 802.21 in heterogeneous wireless networks. In Advanced Communication and Networking, volume 77 of Communications in Computer and Information Science, pages 95--108. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010. ISBN 978-3-642-13404-3. . URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13405-0_10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. X. P. Costa and H. Hartenstein. A simulation study on the performance of mobile ipv6 in a wlan-based cellular network. Computer Networks, 40(1):191--204, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. S. J. K. H. S. Hee Young Jung, Jun Seob Lee and K. El-Malki. Fast Handover for Hierarchical MIPv6 (F-HMIPv6). RFC, RFC Editor, April 2005. URL https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jung-mobileip-fastho-hmipv6-00.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. H. G. Kang and C. Y. Lee. Fast handover based on mobile ipv6 for wireless lan. Asia Pacific Management Review, 10(1):48, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. C.-J. Kim, S.-C. Park, and M.-K. Yi. Fast-handover mechanism between 802.11 wlan and 802.16 wimax with mih in pmipv6. Telecommunication Systems, 55(1):47--54, 2014. ISSN 1018-4864. . URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11235-013-9750-x. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. P.-S. Kim and J. H. Choi. A fast handover scheme for proxy mobile ipv6 using ieee 802.21 media independent handover,. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 43:654--657, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. P. S. Kim and Y.-J. Kim. Hierarchical mobile ipv6 based fast vertical handover using ieee 802.21 media independent handover function. JCIT, 2(4):41--45, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Q. Li, T. Jinmei, and K. Shima. Mobile IPv6: protocols and implementation. Morgan Kaufmann, 1 edition, July 2009. ISBN 978-0123750754. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. L. Magagula, O. Falowo, and H. Chan. Pmipv6 and mih-enhanced pmipv6 for mobility management in heterogeneous wireless networks. In AFRICON, 2009. AFRICON '09., pages 1--5, Sept 2009. .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. L. A. Magagula, O. E. Falowo, and H. A. Chan. Handover optimization in heterogeneous wireless networks: Pmipv6 vs. pmipv6 with mih. Technical report, RFC, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. J. Montavont, E. Ivov, and T. Noel. Analysis of mobile ipv6 handover optimizations and their impact on real-time communication. In Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, 2007.WCNC 2007. IEEE, pages 3244--3249, March 2007. .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. X. Pérez-Costa, M. Torrent-Moreno, and H. Hartenstein. A performance comparison of mobile ipv6, hierarchical mobile ipv6, fast handovers for mobile ipv6 and their combination. ACM SIGMOBILE Mobile Computing and Communications Review, 7(4):5--19, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. L. Xiao and J. Yang. Performance analysis of proxy mobile ipv6 based on ieee802.16e. Frontiers of Electrical and Electronic Engineering in China, 5(4):475--481, 2010. ISSN 1673-3460. . URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11460-010-0112-0.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Performance Analysis of IEEE 802.21 MIH as a Function of Vertical Handover Using PMIPv6 and F-HMIPv6

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in
              • Published in

                cover image ACM Other conferences
                ICEC '15: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Electronic Commerce 2015
                August 2015
                268 pages
                ISBN:9781450334617
                DOI:10.1145/2781562

                Copyright © 2015 ACM

                Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                Publisher

                Association for Computing Machinery

                New York, NY, United States

                Publication History

                • Published: 3 August 2015

                Permissions

                Request permissions about this article.

                Request Permissions

                Check for updates

                Qualifiers

                • research-article
                • Research
                • Refereed limited

                Acceptance Rates

                ICEC '15 Paper Acceptance Rate39of55submissions,71%Overall Acceptance Rate150of244submissions,61%

              PDF Format

              View or Download as a PDF file.

              PDF

              eReader

              View online with eReader.

              eReader