skip to main content
10.1145/2771839.2771852acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesidcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Using neurofeedback to teach self-regulation to children living in poverty

Published:21 June 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper we describe a neuro-feedback system and applications we designed and deployed to help vulnerable children at an NGO-funded school, called Nepal House Kaski, in Pokhara, Nepal. The system, called Mind-Full, enables traumatized children to learn and practice self-regulation by playing simple, culturally appropriate games using an EEG headset connected to an interactive tablet. Children can interact with Mind-Full using body actions that may change their physiology and brain states, which are sensed by the EEG headset and used as input to the games. One of the key challenges was to build an application that the children could immediately understand how to use when they are illiterate, don't speak English and have no computer experience. We describe Mind-Full and highlight the design principles we used to meet these constraints. We report on a subset of findings from a 14-week field experiment in which we use a mixed-methods approach to determine if children improved their ability to self-regulate during gameplay as well as in the classroom, playground and in therapy sessions. Findings from quantitative and qualitative assessment measures suggest that the treatment group significantly improved their ability to calm down and focus in a variety of contexts.

References

  1. Crowley, K., Sliney, A., Pitt, I., and Murphy, D.2010. Evaluating a brain-computer interface to categorize human emotional response. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (Sousse, Tunisia, July 5--7, 2010). ICALT, 276--278 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Ducharme, P, Wharff, E., Hutchinson, E. Kahn, J. Logan, G., and Gonzalez-Heydrich, J. 2012. Videogame assisted emotional regulation training: An ACT with RAGE-Control case illustration. Clin Soc Work Journal, 40 (2012), 75--84.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Grierson, M. and Kiefer, C. 2011. Better brain interfacing for the masses: Progress in event-related potential detection using commercial brain computer interfaces. In Proceedings of Extended Abstracts of Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Vancouver, Canada, May 07--12, 2011). ACM, New York, NY, 1681--1686. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Gruzelier, J. H., Foks, M., Steffert, T., Chen, M. J. L. and Ross, T. 2014. Beneficial outcome from EEG-neurofeedback on creative music performance, attention and well-being in school children. Biol. Psychol. 95 (January 2014), 86--95.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Hammond. D. C. 2005. Neurofeedback treatment of depression and anxiety. J. Adult Dev, 12, 2--3 (August 2005), 131--137.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Huang, J., Yu, C., Wang, Y. 2014. FOCUS: Enhancing children's engagement in reading by using contextual BCI training sessions. In Proceedings of Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Toronto, Canada, April 26--May 12, 2014). ACM, New York, NY, 1905--1908. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Knox, M., Lentini, J., Cummings, T. S., McGrady, A. Whearty, K., and Sancrant, L. 2011. Game-based biofeedback for paediatric anxiety and depression. Mental Health in Family Medicine, 8 (2011), 195--203.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Lagopoulos, J., Xu, J., Rasmussen, I., Vik, A., Malhi, G. S., Eliassen, C. F., et al. 2009. Increased Theta and Alpha EEG Activity During Nondirective Meditation. The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 15, 11 (2009), 1187--1192Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Lee, J., Semple, R. J., Rose, D. Miller, L. Mind-Fullness-based cognitive therapy for children: Results of a pilot study, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 22, 1 (2008), 15--28.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Lim, C. G., Lee, T. S., Guan, C., Fung, D. S., Cheung, Y. B., Teng, S., & Krishnan, K. 2010. Effectiveness of a brain-computer interface based programme for the treatment of ADHD: A pilot study. Psychopharmacol Bull, 43, 1 (2010), 73--82.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Pop-Jordanova N. and Gucev, Z. 2010. Game-based peripheral biofeedback for stress assessment in children, Pediatrics International, 52 (2010), 428--431.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Randye J. Semple, Jennifer Lee, Dinelia Rosa, and Lisa F. Miller. 2009. A randomized trial of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for children: Promoting mindful attention to enhance social-emotional resiliency in children. J. Child Fam. Stud. 19, 2 (August 2009), 218--229.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Rebolledo-Mendez, G., Dunwell, I., Martínez-Mirón, E. A., et al. 2009. Assessing NeuroSky's Usability to Detect Attention Levels in an Assessment Exercise. In Human-Computer Interaction New Trends. J. A. Jacko, ed., Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2009, 149--158. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Reiner, R. 2008. Integrating a portable biofeedback device into clinical practice for patients with anxiety disorders: Results of pilot study, Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback, 33 (2008) 55--61.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Stinson, B. and Arthur, D. 2013. A novel EEG for alpha brain state training, neurobiofeedback and behavior change. Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice, 19, 3 (2013), 114--118.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Van der Oord, S., Bögels, S. M., and Peijnenburg, D. 2012. The effectiveness of mindfulness training for children with ADHD and mindful parenting for their parents. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 21, 1 (2012), 139--147.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Zelazo, P. D. and Lyons, K. E. 2011. Mindfulness training in childhood, Human Development, 54, (2011) 61--65.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Using neurofeedback to teach self-regulation to children living in poverty

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          IDC '15: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children
          June 2015
          488 pages
          ISBN:9781450335904
          DOI:10.1145/2771839

          Copyright © 2015 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 21 June 2015

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          IDC '15 Paper Acceptance Rate24of103submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate172of578submissions,30%

          Upcoming Conference

          IDC '24
          Interaction Design and Children
          June 17 - 20, 2024
          Delft , Netherlands

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader