skip to main content
10.1145/2739482.2768506acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgeccoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Feature Set Optimization for Physical Activity Recognition Using Genetic Algorithms

Published:11 July 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

Physical activity is recognized as one of the key factors for a healthy life due to its beneficial effects. The range of physical activities is very broad, and not all of them require the same effort to be performed nor have the same effects on health. For this reason, automatically recognizing the physical activity performed by a user (or patient) turns out to be an interesting research field, mainly because of two reasons: (1) it increases personal awareness about the activity being performed and its consequences on health, allowing to receive proper credit (e.g. social recognition) for the effort; and (2) it allows doctors to perform continuous remote patient monitoring.

This paper proposes a new approach for improving activity recognition by describing an activity recognition chain (ARC) that is optimized by means of genetic algorithms. This optimization process determines the most suitable and informative set of features that turns out into higher recognition accuracy while reducing the total number of sensors required to track the user activity. These improvements can be translated into lower costs in hardware and less intrusive devices for the patients. In this work, for the assessment of the proposed approach versus other techniques and for replication purposes, a publicly available dataset on physical activity (PAMAP2) has been used.

Experiments are designed and conducted to evaluate the proposed ARC by using leave-one-subject-out cross validation and results are encouraging, reaching an average classification accuracy of about 94%.

References

  1. H. Ali and D. Amalarethinam. Activity recognition with fuzzy finite automata. In Proc. WCCCT'14, pages 222--227, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. N. Alshurafa, W. Xu, J. Liu, M.-C. Huang, B. Mortazavi, C. Roberts, and M. Sarrafzadeh. Designing a robust activity recognition framework for health and exergaming using wearable sensors. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, 18(5):1636--1646, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. M. Altini, J. Penders, R. Vullers, and O. Amft. Estimating energy expenditure using body-worn accelerometers: a comparison of methods, sensors number and positioning. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, 19(1):219--226, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. A. Alvarez, J. Alonso, and G. Trivino. Human activity recognition in indoor environments by means of fusing information extracted from intensity of WiFi signal and accelerations. Information Sciences, 233:162--182, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. D. Anguita, A. Ghio, L. Oneto, X. Parra, and J. L. Reyes-Ortiz. Human activity recognition on smartphones using a multiclass hardware-friendly support vector machine. In Ambient Assisted Living and Home Care, volume 7657 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 216--223. 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. D. Anguita, A. Ghio, L. Oneto, X. Parra, and J. L. Reyes-Ortiz. A public domain dataset for human activity recognition using smartphones. In Proc. ESANN'13, pages 24--26, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. A. E. Bauman, R. S. Reis, J. F. Sallis, J. C. Wells, R. J. Loos, and B. W. Martin. Correlates of physical activity: why are some people physically active and others not? The Lancet, 380(9838):258--271, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. S. J. H. Biddle and M. Asare. Physical activity and mental health in children and adolescents: a review of reviews. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 45(11):886--895, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. M. F. A. bin Abdullah, A. F. P. Negara, S. Sayeed, D.-J. Choi, and K. S. Muthu. Classification algorithms in human activity recognition using smartphones. International Journal of Computer and Information Engineer, 6:77--84, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. A. Bulling, U. Blanke, and B. Schiele. A tutorial on human activity recognition using body-worn inertial sensors. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 46(3):33:1--33:33, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. N. M. Byrne, A. P. Hills, G. R. Hunter, R. L. Weinsier, and Y. Schutz. Metabolic equivalent: one size does not fit all. Journal of Applied Physiology, 99(3):1112--1119, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. C. Catal, S. Tufekci, E. Pirmit, and G. Kocabag. On the use of ensemble of classifiers for accelerometer-based activity recognition. Applied Soft Computing, In Press, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. S. Chen, J. Lach, O., M. Altini, and J. Penders. Unsupervised activity clustering to estimate energy expenditure with a single body sensor. In Proc. BSN'13), 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. S. Chernbumroong, S. Cang, and H. Yu. GA-based classifiers fusion for multi-sensor activity recognition of elderly people. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, 19(1):282--289, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. W. Chodzko-Zajko. Exercise and physical activity for older adults. Universal Access in the Information Society, 3(1):101--106, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. R. Cilla, M. A. Patricio, J. García, A. Berlanga, and J. M. Molina. Recognizing human activities from sensors using hidden markov models constructed by feature selection techniques. Algorithms, 2(1):282--300, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. S. Consolvo, K. Everitt, I. Smith, and J. A. Landay. Design requirements for technologies that encourage physical activity. In Proc. SIGCHI Conf. on Human Factors in Comput. Syst. (CHI'06), pages 457--466, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. L. K. Ejsing, U. Becker, J. S. Tolstrup, and T. Flensborg-Madsen. Physical activity and risk of alcohol use disorders: results from a prospective cohort study. Alcohol and Alcoholism, 50(2):206--212, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. I. Fatima, M. Fahim, Y.-K. Lee, and S. Lee. A genetic algorithm-based classifier ensemble optimization for activity recognition in smart homes. Applied Soft Computing, In Press, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. J. G. Godino, C. Watkinson, K. Corder, S. Sutton, S. J. Griffin, and E. M. van Sluijs. Awareness of physical activity in healthy middle-aged adults: a cross-sectional study of associations with sociodemographic, biological, behavioural, and psychological factors. BMC Public Health, 14(421), 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Y. Gu, L. Quan, and F. Ren. Wifi-assisted human activity recognition. In Proc. APWiMob'14, pages 60--65, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. K. B. Guntera, K. R. Ricea, D. S. Wardb, and S. G. Trosta. Factors associated with physical activity in children attending family child care homes. Preventive Medicine, 54(2):131--133, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. P. Gupta and T. Dallas. Feature selection and activity recognition system using a single triaxial accelerometer. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 61(6):1780--1786, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. A. Haase, A. Steptoe, J. F. Sallis, and J. Wardle. Leisure-time physical activity in university students from 23 countries: associations with health beliefs, risk awareness, and national economic development. Preventive Medicine, 39(1):182--190, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. P. C. Hallal, L. B. Andersen, F. C. Bull, R. Guthold, W. Haskell, and U. Ekelund. Global physical activity levels: surveillance progress, pitfalls, and prospects. The Lancet, 380(9838):247--257, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. G. W. Heath, D. C. Parra, O. L. Sarmiento, L. B. Andersen, N. Owen, S. Goenka, F. Montes, and R. C. Brownson. Evidence-based intervention in physical activity: lessons from around the world. The Lancet, 380(9838):272--281, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. I. L. IM, H. Sesso, J. Chen, and R. Paffenbarger. Does physical activity play a role in the prevention of prostate cancer? Epidemiologic Reviews, 23(1):132--137, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Janssen and LeBlanc. Systematic review of the health benefits of physical activity and fitness in school-aged children and youth. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 7(40), 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. P. R. Kahn, A. Kinsolving, M. A. Christensen, B. Y. Lee, and D. Vogel. Human activity monitoring device with activity identification, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. J. A. Knight. Physical inactivity: associated diseases and disorders. Annals of Clinical & Laboratory Science, 42(3):320--337, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. A. Merglen, A. Flatz, R. E. Bélanger, P.-A. Michaud, and J.-C. Suris. Weekly sport practice and adolescent well-being. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 99:208--210, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. D. Morris, I. Kelner, F. Shariff, D. Tom, T. S. Saponas, and A. Guillory. Personal training with physical activity monitoring device, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. A. Reiss. Personalized Mobile Physical Activity Monitoring for Everyday Life. PhD thesis, Technical University of Kaiserslautern, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. A. Reiss, G. Hendeby, and D. Stricker. A competitive approach for human activity recognition on smartphones. In Proc. ESANN'13, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. A. Reiss, G. Hendeby, and D. Stricker. A novel confidence-based multiclass boosting algorithm for mobile physical activity monitoring. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 19(1):105--121, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. A. Reiss and D. Stricker. Towards global aerobic activity monitoring. In Proc. PETRA'11, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. A. Reiss and D. Stricker. Creating and benchmarking a new dataset for physical activity monitoring. In Proc. 5th Intl. Conf. Pervasive Tech. related to Assistive Environments (PETRA'12), pages 108--109, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. A. Reiss and D. Stricker. Introducing a new benchmarked dataset for activity monitoring. In Proc. Intl. Symp. Wearable Computers (ISWC'12), pages 108--109, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. A. Reiss and D. Stricker. Aerobic activity monitoring: towards a long-term approach. Universal Access in the Information Society, 13:101--114, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. A. Reiss, D. Stricker, and I. Lamprinos. An integrated mobile system for long-term aerobic activity monitoring and support in daily life. In Proc. TrustCom'12, pages 2021--2028, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. A. Reiss, M. Weber, and D. Stricker. Exploring and extending the boundaries of physical activity recognition. In Proc. ICSMC'11, pages 46--50, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Y. Saeys, I. Inza, and P. Larrañaga. A review of feature selection techniques in bioinformatics. Bioinformatics, 23(19):2507--2517, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. T. R. D. Saputri, A. M. Khan, and S.-W. Lee. User-independent activity recognition via three-stage GA-based feature selection. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 2014, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. P. Schnohr, M. Grønbæk, L. Petersen, H. O. Hein, and T. I. Sørensen. Physical activity in leisure-time and risk of cancer: 14-year follow-up of 28,000 Danish men and women. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 33(4):244--249, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. J. Seiter, A. Derungs, C. Schuster-Amft, O. Amft, , and G. Trster. Activity routine discovery in stroke rehabilitation patients without data annotation. In Proc. Rehab'14, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. M. Shoaib, S. Bosch, O. D. Incel, H. Scholten, and P. J. Havinga. A survey of online activity recognition using mobile phones. Sensors, 15(1):2059--2085, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. L. M. Soria, L. Gonzalez-Abril, J. A. Ortega, and M. A. Alvarez. Low energy physical activity recognition system on smartphones. Sensors, 15(3):5163--5196, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. X. Su, H. Tong, and P. Ji. Activity recognition with smartphone sensors. Tsinghua Science and Technology, 19(3):235--249, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. X. Sun, H. Kashima, and N. Ueda. Large-scale personalized human activity recognition using online multitask learning. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 25(11):2551--2563, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. W. Ugulino, D. Cardador, K. Vega, E. Velloso, R. Milidiú, , and H. Fuks. Wearable computing: accelerometers' data classification of body postures and movements. In Advances in Artificial Intelligence - SBIA 2012, pages 52--61. 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. A. W. Vaes, A. Cheung, M. Atakhorrami, M. T. J. Groenen, O. Amft, F. M. E. Franssen, E. F. M. Wouters, and M. A. Spruit. Effect of 'activity monitor-based' counseling on physical activity and health-related outcomes in patients with chronic diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Annals of Medicine, 45(5-6):397--412, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. C. A. Vock, P. Flentov, and D. M. Darcy. Activity monitoring systems and methods, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. K. L. White, M. L. Orenstein, J. Campbell, C. S. Self, E. Walker, M. Micheletti, G. McKeag, J. Zipperer, and M. Lapinsky. Activity recognition with activity reminders, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Q. Xiao, H. P. Yang, N. Wentzensen, A. Hollenbeck, and C. E. Matthews. Physical activity in different periods of life, sedentary behavior, and the risk of ovarian cancer in the NIH-AARP diet and health study. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 22(11):2000--2008, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. G. Yu, J. Yuan, and Z. Liu. Propagative Hough voting for human activity detection and recognition. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 25(1):87--98, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. S. G. J. Yuen, J. Park, and E. N. Friedman. Activity monitoring systems and methods of operating same, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Y. Zheng, W.-K. Wong, X. Guan, and S. Trost. Physical activity recognition from accelerometer data using a multi-scale ensemble method. In Proc. IAAI'10, pages 1575--1581, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Y. Zhu, C. Wang, J. Zhang, and J. Xu. Human activity recognition based on similarity. In Proc. CSE'14, pages 1382--1387, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Feature Set Optimization for Physical Activity Recognition Using Genetic Algorithms

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            GECCO Companion '15: Proceedings of the Companion Publication of the 2015 Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation
            July 2015
            1568 pages
            ISBN:9781450334884
            DOI:10.1145/2739482

            Copyright © 2015 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 11 July 2015

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate1,669of4,410submissions,38%

            Upcoming Conference

            GECCO '24
            Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
            July 14 - 18, 2024
            Melbourne , VIC , Australia

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader