skip to main content
10.1145/273133.274308acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Constructivism in computer science education

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 March 1998Publication History

ABSTRACT

Constructivism is a theory of learning which claims that students construct knowledge rather than merely receive and store knowledge transmitted by the teacher. Constructivism has been extremely influential in science and mathematics education, but not in computer science education (CSE). This paper surveys constructivism in the context of CSE, and shows how the theory can supply a theoretical basis for debating issues and evaluating proposals.

References

  1. 1.R. B. Davis, C. A. Maher, and N. Noddings, editors. Constructivist Views of the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics. J. for Research in Mathematics Education. Monograph No. 4. National Council for the Teaching of Mathematics, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.A. A. diSessa, H. Abelson, and D. Ploger. An overview of boxer. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 10:3-15, 1991. .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.B. du Boulay. Some difficulties of learning to program. In Soloway and Spohrer {17}, pages 283-299.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.R. Duit. Students' conceptual frameworks: consequences for learning science. In Glynn et al {7}, pages 65--85.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.P. Ernest. The one and the many. In Steffe andGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.S. M. Glynn. Explaining science con~pts: a teaching-with-analogies model. In Glynn et al. {7}, pages 219-240.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.s. M. G1ynn, R. H. Yeany, and B. K. Britton, editors. The Psychology of Learning Science. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.S. Holland, R. Griffiths, and M. Woodman. Avoiding object misconceptions. SIGCSE Bulletin, 29(1)'131-134, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. 9.S. K. Madison. A Study of College Students' Construct of Parameter Passing: Implications for Instruction. PhD thesis, U. of Wisconsin, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. 10.R. E. Mayer, editor. Teaching and Learning Computer Programming. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.R. D. Pea. Language-independent conceptual "bugs" in novice programming. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2(1):25-36, 1986.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. 12.D. Perkins, S. Schwartz, and R. Simmons. Instructional strategies for the problems of novice programmers. InMayer {10}, pages 153-178.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.L. Sherry. A model computer simulation as an epistemic game. SIGCSE Bulletin, 3(2):59-64, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. 14.D. Sleeman, R. T. Putnam, J. A. Baxter, and L. Kuspa. An introductory pascal class: A case study of student errors. In Mayer {10}, pages 237-257.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.D. Sleeman, R. 'T. Putnana, J. A. Baxter, and L. Kuspa. A summary of misconceptions of high school basic programmers. In Soloway and Spohrer {17}, pages 301-314.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.J. E Smith HI, A. A. diSessa, and J. Roschelle. Misconceptions reconceived" A constructivist analysis of knowledge in transition. The Journal of The Learning Sciences, 3(2)'115-163, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.E. Soloway and J. C. Spohrer, editors. Studying the Novice Programmer. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1989. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. 18.L. P. Steffe and J. Gale, editors. Constructivism in Education. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.S. Turkle and S. Papert. Epistemological pluralism: Styles and cultures within the computer culture. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 16(1):128-148, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. 20.E. yon Glaserseld. A constructivist approach to teaching. In Steffe and Gale {18}, pages 3-15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Constructivism in computer science education

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SIGCSE '98: Proceedings of the twenty-ninth SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education
        March 1998
        396 pages
        ISBN:0897919947
        DOI:10.1145/273133

        Copyright © 1998 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 1 March 1998

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        SIGCSE '98 Paper Acceptance Rate72of201submissions,36%Overall Acceptance Rate1,595of4,542submissions,35%

        Upcoming Conference

        SIGCSE Virtual 2024

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader