skip to main content
10.1145/2702613.2732732acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Work in Progress

Leaderboard Position Psychology: Counterfactual Thinking

Published:18 April 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

One of the main principles of gamification is the use of social comparison. Leaderboards are commonly used to allow players to compare their performance against others'. We sought to examine how leaderboard ranking affected satisfaction with a game and desire to play a game again. In our study, individuals in a second, fourth, or seventh position on the leaderboard reported higher satisfaction than individuals in other positions on the leaderboard. Our results support a potential mechanism that might contribute to game satisfaction from leaderboard position: counterfactual thinking. Future work and implications for the design of leaderboards are discussed.

References

  1. Antin, J., & Churchill, E. Badges in Social Media: A Social Psychological Perspective. In CHI 2011 Gamification Workshop Proceedings.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Butler, C. The Effect of Leaderboard Ranking on Players' Perception of Gaming Fun. In Online Communities and Social Computing, Springer Berlin, Heidelberg (2013), 129--136. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining --gamification. Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments, USA, 15, 9--15. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Epstude, K., & Roese, N.J. (2008). The functional basis of counterfactual thinking. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12(2), 168--192.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Landers, R. N., & Landers, A. K. (2015). An Empirical Test of the Theory of Gamified Learning: The Effect of Leaderboards on Time-on-Task and Academic Performance. Simulation and Gaming. doi: 10.1177/1046878114563662 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Medvec, V. H., Madey, S. F., & Gilovich, T. (1995). When less is more: counterfactual thinking and satisfaction among Olympic medalists. Journal of personality and social psychology, 69(4), 603.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Shapiro, D. N., Chandler, J., & Mueller, P. A. (2013). Using Mechanical Turk to study clinical populations. Clinical Psychological Science.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Schell, J. The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses. CRC Press, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Zichermann, G., & Cunningham, C. Gamification by design: Implementing game mechanics in web and mobile apps. O'Reilly Media, Sebastopol, CA, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Leaderboard Position Psychology: Counterfactual Thinking

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI EA '15: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2015
      2546 pages
      ISBN:9781450331463
      DOI:10.1145/2702613

      Copyright © 2015 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 18 April 2015

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Work in Progress

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI EA '15 Paper Acceptance Rate379of1,520submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader