skip to main content
10.1145/2696454.2696492acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

OPTIMo: Online Probabilistic Trust Inference Model for Asymmetric Human-Robot Collaborations

Published:02 March 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present OPTIMo: an Online Probabilistic Trust Inference Model for quantifying the degree of trust that a human supervisor has in an autonomous robot "worker". Represented as a Dynamic Bayesian Network, OPTIMo infers beliefs over the human's moment-to-moment latent trust states, based on the history of observed interaction experiences. A separate model instance is trained on each user's experiences, leading to an interpretable and personalized characterization of that operator's behaviors and attitudes. Using datasets collected from an interaction study with a large group of roboticists, we empirically assess OPTIMo's performance under a broad range of configurations. These evaluation results highlight OPTIMo's advances in both prediction accuracy and responsiveness over several existing trust models. This accurate and near real-time human-robot trust measure makes possible the development of autonomous robots that can adapt their behaviors dynamically, to actively seek greater trust and greater efficiency within future human-robot collaborations.

References

  1. J. A. Cowley and H. Youngblood. Subjective response differences between visual analogue, ordinal and hybrid response scales. Proc. of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 53(25), 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. M. Desai. Modeling Trust to Improve Human-Robot Interaction. PhD thesis, Computer Science Department, University of Massachusetts Lowell, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. R. J. Hall. Trusting your assistant. In Knowledge-Based Soft. Eng. Conf. (KBSE'11), 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. J.-Y. Jian, A. M. Bisantz, and C. G. Drury. Foundations for an empirically determined scale of trust in automated systems. International J. of Cognitive Ergonomics, 4(1), 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. A. Jøsang, R. Hayward, and S. Pope. Trust network analysis with subjective logic. In Australasian Computer Science Conf. (ACSC'06), 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. D. Koller and N. Friedman. Probabilistic Graphical Models: Principles and Techniques. MIT Press, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. J. Lee and N. Moray. Trust, control strategies and allocation of function in human-machine systems. Ergonomics, 35(10), 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. J. D. Lee and K. A. See. Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human Factors, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. B. M. Muir. Operators' trust in and use of automatic controllers in a supervisory process control task. PhD thesis, University of Toronto, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. A. Pierson and M. Schwager. Adaptive inter-robot trust for robust multi-robot sensor coverage. In Int. Sym. on Robotics Research (ISRR'13), 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. C. Pippin and H. I. Christensen. Trust modeling in multi-robot patrolling. In Proc. of the IEEE Int. Conf. on Rob. and Auto. (ICRA'14), 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. U.-D. Reips and F. Funke. Interval-level measurement with visual analogue scales in internet-based research: Vas generator. Behavior Research Methods, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. A. Xu. 2-Step Temporal Bayesian Networks (2TBN): filtering, smoothing, and beyond. Technical Report TRCIM1030, McGill U., 2014. www.cim.mcgill.ca/~anqixu/pub/2TBN.TRCIM1030.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. A. Xu and G. Dudek. Towards modeling real-time trust in asymmetric human-robot collaborations. In Int. Sym. on Robotics Research (ISRR'13), 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. A. Xu, A. Kalmbach, and G. Dudek. Adaptive Parameter EXploration (APEX): Adaptation of robot autonomy from human participation. In Proc. of the IEEE Int. Conf. on Rob. and Auto. (ICRA'14), 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. OPTIMo: Online Probabilistic Trust Inference Model for Asymmetric Human-Robot Collaborations

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        HRI '15: Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction
        March 2015
        368 pages
        ISBN:9781450328838
        DOI:10.1145/2696454

        Copyright © 2015 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 2 March 2015

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        HRI '15 Paper Acceptance Rate43of169submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate242of1,000submissions,24%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader