ABSTRACT
With the increasing spread and pervasiveness of technologies, the role of gender in the design of these technologies is a topic of growing importance. Several conference panels and journal issues have focused on the contributions feminism, gender theory, and queer theory can make to HCI. This paper discusses the key developments in the sub-field of Gender HCI over the past five years. We discuss, in particular, how recent approaches to gender in HCI move past questions of how men and women interact differently with technologies. Scholars are focusing on activist, intersectional, and reflexive approaches to gender and identity in design that focus on inclusion and accountability in terms of who technologies are designed for and in what ways. This scholarship draws on a wide variety of theoretical approaches to gender not integrated or well-known in the general literature or education in HCI or computing. We recommend the implementation of a Gender 101 general education module for all computing students to provide fluency in gender theory as a way to promote discussion, inclusivity, and accountability in interaction design and computing practices and organizations.
- Alhutter, D. Mind scripting: a method for deconstructive design. Science, Technology and Human Values 37, 6 (2012), 684-707.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Alsheikh, T., Rode, J., and Lindley, S. (Whose) value-sensitive design: a study of long-distance relationships in an Arabic cultural context. Proc. CSCW 2011, ACM Press (2011), 75--84. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Barad, K. Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter. Signs 28, 3 (2003), 801--831.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bardzell, S. Feminist HCI: taking stock and outlining an agenda for design. Proc. CHI 2010, ACM Press (2010), 1301--1310. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bardzell, S. and Bardzell, J. Towards a feminist HCI methodology: social science, feminism, and HCI. Proc. CHI 2011, ACM Press (2011), 675--684. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bardzell, S. and Churchill, E.F. Feminism and HCI: New Perspectives, Special Issue Editors' Introduction. Interacting with Computers 23, 5 (2011), iii--xi. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bath, C. Searching for methodology: Feminist technology design in computer science. Proc. 5th European Symposium on Gender & ICT, (2009).Google Scholar
- Beckwith, L. and Burnett, M. Gender: An Important Factor in End-User Programming Environments? 2004 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages - Human Centric Computing, IEEE (2004), 107--114. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Berg, A. A gendered socio-technical construction: The smart house. In D. Mackenzie and J. Wajcman, eds., The Social Shaping of Technology. Open University Press, UK (1999), 301--313.Google Scholar
- Brahnam, S., Karanikas, M., and Weaver, M. (Un)dressing the interface: Exposing the foundational HCI metaphor "computer is woman." Interacting with Computers 23, 5 (2011), 401--412. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bray, F. Gender and Technology. Annual Review of Anthropology 36, 1 (2007), 37--53.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Breslin, S. and Wadhwa, B. Exploring possibilities for nuanced gender erspectives within design education, presented at CHI 2014, (2014). http://bit.ly/1rHGVlE.Google Scholar
- Breslin, S. and Wadhwa, B. EnGendering interaction design. Proc. i-USEr 2014 2014, IEEE (forthcoming).Google ScholarCross Ref
- Butler, J. Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge, New York, USA, 1999.Google Scholar
- Cassell, J. Genderizing HCI. In J. Jacko and A. Sears, eds. The Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, USA (2002), 402-411.Google Scholar
- Chasin, A. Class and its close relations: Identities among Women, Servants, and Machines. In J. Halberstram and I. Livingston, eds., Posthuman Bodies. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN, USA (1995), 73--96.Google Scholar
- Churchill, E.F. Sugared puppy-dog tails: Gender and design. interactions 17, 2 (2010), 52--56. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Crenshaw, K. Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, Chicago, IL, USA (1989), 139--167.Google Scholar
- Crenshaw, K. Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review 43, 6 (1991), 1241--1299.Google ScholarCross Ref
- de Beauvoir, S. The Second Sex, Vintage, New York, USA, 1989.Google Scholar
- Dimond, J.P. Feminist HCI for real: Designing technology in support of a social movement. PhD Thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, 2012.Google Scholar
- Dray, S. M. et al. Leveraging the progress of women in the HCI field to address the diversity chasm. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2013, ACM Press (2013), 2399-2407. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dray, S.M. et al. Exploring the representation of women perspectives in technologies. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2013, ACM Press (2013), 2447-2454. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dray, S.M., Holtzblatt, K., Murray, D., Busse, D. K., Brock, A. M., Peters, A. N., Bardzell, S., Druin, A., Burnett, M. M., Churchill, E. F., and Williams, G. Perspectives on gender and product design, Ext. Abstracts CHI 2014, ACM Press (2014), 53--56. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Faulkner, W. The Power and the pleasure? A research agenda for 'making Ggnder stick' to engineers." Science, Technology & Human Values 25, 1 (2000), 87--119.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Forsythe, D. Studying Those Who Study Us: An Anthropologist in the World of Artificial Intelligence. Stanford University Press, Stanford, USA, 2001. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gill, K., Brooks, K, McDougall, J., Patel, P., and Kes, A. Bridging the gender divide: How technology can advance women economically. International Center for Research on Women, Washington, DC, USA, 2010.Google Scholar
- Haimson, O. L. and Hayes, G. R. Understanding gender transition on social media to design technology for changing identities," presented at CHI 2014, unpublished (2014).Google Scholar
- Haraway, D. 'Gender' for a Marxist dictionary: The sexual politics of a word. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature, Routledge, New York, USA (1991), 127--148.Google Scholar
- Haraway, D. Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies 14, 3 (1988), 575--599.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Harding S., The Science Question in Feminism. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, USA 1986.Google Scholar
- Huff C. and Cooper J., Sex bias in educational software: The effect of designers' stereotypes on the software they design," J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 17, 6 (1987), 519--532.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Irani, L., Vertesi, J., Dourish, P., Philip, K., and Grinter, R. E. Postcolonial computing: A lens on design and development," in Proc. CHI 2010, ACM Press (2010), 1311--1320. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jamaludin, Z. Designing interface for girls: Looking at the 'form' and 'content' factors in a comic container. Proc. i-USEr 2011, IEEE (2011), 36--41.Google Scholar
- Kelleher, C., Pausch, R., and Kiesler, S. Storytelling alice motivates middle school girls to learn computer programming. Proc CHI 2007, ACM Press (2007), p. 1455, 2007. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Keller, E. F. Reflections on Gender and Science. Yale University Press, New Haven, CN, USA, 1985.Google Scholar
- Kirkup, G., Zalevski, A., Maruyama, T., and Batool, I. Women and men in science, engineering and technology: the UK statistics guide 2010, the UKRC, Bradford, England, 2010.Google Scholar
- Kotamraju, N. P. Playing stupid, caring for users, and putting on a good show: Feminist acts in usability study work," Interacting with Computers 23, 5 (2011), 439--446. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kumar, J., Rosenberg, D., Courage, C., Rohn, J., Kamm, L., Anderson, L., Holsberry, C., and Chavan, A. L. Women in UX leadership in business. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2012, p. 1107, 2012. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Light, A. HCI as heterodoxy: Technologies of identity and the queering of interaction with computers, Interacting with Computers 23, 5 (2011) 430--438. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mahmood, S. Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 2005.Google Scholar
- Marsden, N. Doing gender in input fields. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2014, ACM Press (2014), 1399--1404. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mellström, U. Patriarchal machines and masculine embodiment. Science, Technology & Human Values 27, 4 (2002), 460--478.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Oudshoorn, N. Rommes, E. and Stienstra, M. Configuring the user as everybody: Gender and design cultures in information and communication technologies. Science, Technology & Human Values 29, 1 (2004), 30--63.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Pätz, H. S. Gender and Technology: The 'Female Factor' in Software Design. Master's Thesis, Vienna University of Economics and Business, 2011.Google Scholar
- Perspectives on Fender and Product Design: Are we living in a man-made world? Workshop Papers CHI 2014, 2014. https://sites.google.com/site/technologydesignperspectives/papers.Google Scholar
- Peters, A., Dray, S., and Kaye, J. SIG: Work life balance in HCI. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2012, ACM Press (2012), 1229--1231. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Computer Programmers in the United States, 2007. Population Reference Bureau, Washington DC, USA (2008).Google Scholar
- Ratzer, B., Weisse, A., Weixelbaumer, B., Tscheligi, M., Raneburger, D., Popp, R. and Falb, J. Bringing gender into technology: A case study in user-interface-design and the perspective of gender experts. Inter. J. of Gender, Science and Technology 6, 1(2014), 4--24.Google Scholar
- Rode, J. A. A theoretical agenda for feminist HCI. Interact with Computers 23, 5 (2011), 393--400. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rommes, E. Gender sensitive design practices. Trauth, E.M., eds. Encycl. Gender and Information Technology. Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, PA, USA (2006), 675--681.Google Scholar
- Rommes, E., Bath, C., and Maass, S. Methods for intervention: Gender analysis and feminist design of ICT. Science, Technology & Human Values 37, 6 (2012), 653--662.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rothschild, J., ed. Design and Feminism: Re-visioning Spaces, Places, and Everyday Things. Rutgers University Press, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 1999.Google Scholar
- Ruff, C. Gender Imbalance in the Design School: Enrollment Patterns Among Interior Design Students. Master's Thesis, Arizona State University, 2014.Google Scholar
- Satchell, C. Women are people too: The problem of designing for gender. presented at CHI 2010, unpublished(2010). http://eprints.qut.edu.au/38250/1/c38250.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Stephanidis, C. User Interfaces for All: Concepts, Methods, and Tools. Lawrence Erlbaum, Portland, OR, USA, 2001. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Suchman, L. Located accountabilities in technology production. Scandanavian J. of Information Systems 14, 2 (2002), 91--105. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tan, D. S., Czerwinski, M., and Robertson, G. Women go with the (optical) flow. Proc. CHI 2003, ACM Press (2003), 209--215. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Turkle, S. Computational reticence: Why women fear the intimate machine. C. Kramarae, ed., Technology and Women's Voices: Keeping in Touch, Routledge, New York, USA (1988), 33--49.Google Scholar
- Unnecessarily Gendered Products. http://unnecessarilygenderedproducts.tumblr.com/.Google Scholar
- van der Velden, M. and Mörtberg, C. Between need and desire: Exploring strategies for gendering design. Science, Technology & Human Values 37, 6 (2011), 663--683.Google Scholar
- Williams, G. Are you sure your software is gender-neutral?. Interactions 21, 1(2014), 36--39. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Women's work. Nature 495, 5(2013), 21--42.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Exploring Nuanced Gender Perspectives within the HCI Community
Recommendations
Towards a Gender HCI Curriculum
CHI EA '15: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing SystemsThe interaction between humans and computers, at the center of HCI research, embodies societal values and norms relating to gender and other forms of identity. However, there is limited knowledge and understanding among students and researchers ...
Feminist HCI: taking stock and outlining an agenda for design
CHI '10: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsFeminism is a natural ally to interaction design, due to its central commitments to issues such as agency, fulfillment, identity, equity, empowerment, and social justice. In this paper, I summarize the state of the art of feminism in HCI and propose ...
Feminism and Feminist Approaches in Social Computing
CSCW'15 Companion: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference Companion on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social ComputingFollowing on the successful CSCW 2014 workshop on Feminism and Social Media, this workshop will bring together a set of CSCW scholars to discuss feminist perspectives in social computing and technology. We will explore theoretical and methodological ...
Comments