skip to main content
10.1145/2676702.2676709acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesindiahciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Exploring Nuanced Gender Perspectives within the HCI Community

Authors Info & Claims
Published:07 December 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

With the increasing spread and pervasiveness of technologies, the role of gender in the design of these technologies is a topic of growing importance. Several conference panels and journal issues have focused on the contributions feminism, gender theory, and queer theory can make to HCI. This paper discusses the key developments in the sub-field of Gender HCI over the past five years. We discuss, in particular, how recent approaches to gender in HCI move past questions of how men and women interact differently with technologies. Scholars are focusing on activist, intersectional, and reflexive approaches to gender and identity in design that focus on inclusion and accountability in terms of who technologies are designed for and in what ways. This scholarship draws on a wide variety of theoretical approaches to gender not integrated or well-known in the general literature or education in HCI or computing. We recommend the implementation of a Gender 101 general education module for all computing students to provide fluency in gender theory as a way to promote discussion, inclusivity, and accountability in interaction design and computing practices and organizations.

References

  1. Alhutter, D. Mind scripting: a method for deconstructive design. Science, Technology and Human Values 37, 6 (2012), 684-707.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Alsheikh, T., Rode, J., and Lindley, S. (Whose) value-sensitive design: a study of long-distance relationships in an Arabic cultural context. Proc. CSCW 2011, ACM Press (2011), 75--84. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Barad, K. Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter. Signs 28, 3 (2003), 801--831.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Bardzell, S. Feminist HCI: taking stock and outlining an agenda for design. Proc. CHI 2010, ACM Press (2010), 1301--1310. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Bardzell, S. and Bardzell, J. Towards a feminist HCI methodology: social science, feminism, and HCI. Proc. CHI 2011, ACM Press (2011), 675--684. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Bardzell, S. and Churchill, E.F. Feminism and HCI: New Perspectives, Special Issue Editors' Introduction. Interacting with Computers 23, 5 (2011), iii--xi. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Bath, C. Searching for methodology: Feminist technology design in computer science. Proc. 5th European Symposium on Gender & ICT, (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Beckwith, L. and Burnett, M. Gender: An Important Factor in End-User Programming Environments? 2004 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages - Human Centric Computing, IEEE (2004), 107--114. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Berg, A. A gendered socio-technical construction: The smart house. In D. Mackenzie and J. Wajcman, eds., The Social Shaping of Technology. Open University Press, UK (1999), 301--313.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Brahnam, S., Karanikas, M., and Weaver, M. (Un)dressing the interface: Exposing the foundational HCI metaphor "computer is woman." Interacting with Computers 23, 5 (2011), 401--412. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Bray, F. Gender and Technology. Annual Review of Anthropology 36, 1 (2007), 37--53.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Breslin, S. and Wadhwa, B. Exploring possibilities for nuanced gender erspectives within design education, presented at CHI 2014, (2014). http://bit.ly/1rHGVlE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Breslin, S. and Wadhwa, B. EnGendering interaction design. Proc. i-USEr 2014 2014, IEEE (forthcoming).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Butler, J. Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge, New York, USA, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Cassell, J. Genderizing HCI. In J. Jacko and A. Sears, eds. The Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, USA (2002), 402-411.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Chasin, A. Class and its close relations: Identities among Women, Servants, and Machines. In J. Halberstram and I. Livingston, eds., Posthuman Bodies. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN, USA (1995), 73--96.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Churchill, E.F. Sugared puppy-dog tails: Gender and design. interactions 17, 2 (2010), 52--56. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Crenshaw, K. Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, Chicago, IL, USA (1989), 139--167.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Crenshaw, K. Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review 43, 6 (1991), 1241--1299.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. de Beauvoir, S. The Second Sex, Vintage, New York, USA, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Dimond, J.P. Feminist HCI for real: Designing technology in support of a social movement. PhD Thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Dray, S. M. et al. Leveraging the progress of women in the HCI field to address the diversity chasm. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2013, ACM Press (2013), 2399-2407. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Dray, S.M. et al. Exploring the representation of women perspectives in technologies. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2013, ACM Press (2013), 2447-2454. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Dray, S.M., Holtzblatt, K., Murray, D., Busse, D. K., Brock, A. M., Peters, A. N., Bardzell, S., Druin, A., Burnett, M. M., Churchill, E. F., and Williams, G. Perspectives on gender and product design, Ext. Abstracts CHI 2014, ACM Press (2014), 53--56. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Faulkner, W. The Power and the pleasure? A research agenda for 'making Ggnder stick' to engineers." Science, Technology & Human Values 25, 1 (2000), 87--119.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Forsythe, D. Studying Those Who Study Us: An Anthropologist in the World of Artificial Intelligence. Stanford University Press, Stanford, USA, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Gill, K., Brooks, K, McDougall, J., Patel, P., and Kes, A. Bridging the gender divide: How technology can advance women economically. International Center for Research on Women, Washington, DC, USA, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Haimson, O. L. and Hayes, G. R. Understanding gender transition on social media to design technology for changing identities," presented at CHI 2014, unpublished (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Haraway, D. 'Gender' for a Marxist dictionary: The sexual politics of a word. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature, Routledge, New York, USA (1991), 127--148.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Haraway, D. Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies 14, 3 (1988), 575--599.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Harding S., The Science Question in Feminism. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, USA 1986.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Huff C. and Cooper J., Sex bias in educational software: The effect of designers' stereotypes on the software they design," J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 17, 6 (1987), 519--532.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Irani, L., Vertesi, J., Dourish, P., Philip, K., and Grinter, R. E. Postcolonial computing: A lens on design and development," in Proc. CHI 2010, ACM Press (2010), 1311--1320. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Jamaludin, Z. Designing interface for girls: Looking at the 'form' and 'content' factors in a comic container. Proc. i-USEr 2011, IEEE (2011), 36--41.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Kelleher, C., Pausch, R., and Kiesler, S. Storytelling alice motivates middle school girls to learn computer programming. Proc CHI 2007, ACM Press (2007), p. 1455, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Keller, E. F. Reflections on Gender and Science. Yale University Press, New Haven, CN, USA, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Kirkup, G., Zalevski, A., Maruyama, T., and Batool, I. Women and men in science, engineering and technology: the UK statistics guide 2010, the UKRC, Bradford, England, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Kotamraju, N. P. Playing stupid, caring for users, and putting on a good show: Feminist acts in usability study work," Interacting with Computers 23, 5 (2011), 439--446. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Kumar, J., Rosenberg, D., Courage, C., Rohn, J., Kamm, L., Anderson, L., Holsberry, C., and Chavan, A. L. Women in UX leadership in business. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2012, p. 1107, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Light, A. HCI as heterodoxy: Technologies of identity and the queering of interaction with computers, Interacting with Computers 23, 5 (2011) 430--438. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Mahmood, S. Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Marsden, N. Doing gender in input fields. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2014, ACM Press (2014), 1399--1404. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Mellström, U. Patriarchal machines and masculine embodiment. Science, Technology & Human Values 27, 4 (2002), 460--478.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Oudshoorn, N. Rommes, E. and Stienstra, M. Configuring the user as everybody: Gender and design cultures in information and communication technologies. Science, Technology & Human Values 29, 1 (2004), 30--63.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Pätz, H. S. Gender and Technology: The 'Female Factor' in Software Design. Master's Thesis, Vienna University of Economics and Business, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Perspectives on Fender and Product Design: Are we living in a man-made world? Workshop Papers CHI 2014, 2014. https://sites.google.com/site/technologydesignperspectives/papers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Peters, A., Dray, S., and Kaye, J. SIG: Work life balance in HCI. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2012, ACM Press (2012), 1229--1231. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Computer Programmers in the United States, 2007. Population Reference Bureau, Washington DC, USA (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Ratzer, B., Weisse, A., Weixelbaumer, B., Tscheligi, M., Raneburger, D., Popp, R. and Falb, J. Bringing gender into technology: A case study in user-interface-design and the perspective of gender experts. Inter. J. of Gender, Science and Technology 6, 1(2014), 4--24.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Rode, J. A. A theoretical agenda for feminist HCI. Interact with Computers 23, 5 (2011), 393--400. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Rommes, E. Gender sensitive design practices. Trauth, E.M., eds. Encycl. Gender and Information Technology. Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, PA, USA (2006), 675--681.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Rommes, E., Bath, C., and Maass, S. Methods for intervention: Gender analysis and feminist design of ICT. Science, Technology & Human Values 37, 6 (2012), 653--662.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Rothschild, J., ed. Design and Feminism: Re-visioning Spaces, Places, and Everyday Things. Rutgers University Press, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Ruff, C. Gender Imbalance in the Design School: Enrollment Patterns Among Interior Design Students. Master's Thesis, Arizona State University, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Satchell, C. Women are people too: The problem of designing for gender. presented at CHI 2010, unpublished(2010). http://eprints.qut.edu.au/38250/1/c38250.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Stephanidis, C. User Interfaces for All: Concepts, Methods, and Tools. Lawrence Erlbaum, Portland, OR, USA, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Suchman, L. Located accountabilities in technology production. Scandanavian J. of Information Systems 14, 2 (2002), 91--105. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Tan, D. S., Czerwinski, M., and Robertson, G. Women go with the (optical) flow. Proc. CHI 2003, ACM Press (2003), 209--215. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Turkle, S. Computational reticence: Why women fear the intimate machine. C. Kramarae, ed., Technology and Women's Voices: Keeping in Touch, Routledge, New York, USA (1988), 33--49.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Unnecessarily Gendered Products. http://unnecessarilygenderedproducts.tumblr.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. van der Velden, M. and Mörtberg, C. Between need and desire: Exploring strategies for gendering design. Science, Technology & Human Values 37, 6 (2011), 663--683.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Williams, G. Are you sure your software is gender-neutral?. Interactions 21, 1(2014), 36--39. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Women's work. Nature 495, 5(2013), 21--42.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Exploring Nuanced Gender Perspectives within the HCI Community

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      IndiaHCI '14: Proceedings of the 6th Indian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction
      December 2014
      184 pages
      ISBN:9781450332187
      DOI:10.1145/2676702

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 December 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate33of93submissions,35%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader