skip to main content
10.1145/2666216.2666228acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
tutorial

Unifying the Shift and Narrow Strategies in Focus+Context Exploratory Search

Published:27 September 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper we discuss two existing exploration strategies -- Shift and Narrow -- employed by Focus+Context techniques, and how they are supported in the user interface of Saffron, a web-based system enabling exploration of academic topics, authors, and publications. The Shift strategy enables the user to shift focus between different resources while the Narrow strategy enables the user to narrow the focus. Current systems typically support only one of these approaches or include them as separate interaction modes. Saffron supports both strategies in a unified user interface. An initial user study indicates that participants use and appreciate both strategies being supported simultaneously.

References

  1. Association for Computational Linguistics. (2013). ACL Anthology. http://aclweb.org/anthology-newGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Association for Computing Machinery. 2013. ACM Digital Library. http://dl.acm.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Hearst, M. A., and Stoica, E. NLP support for faceted navigation in scholarly collections. In Proceedings of the 2009 Workshop on Text and Citation Analysis for Scholarly Digital Libraries (NLPIR4DL 2009). Association for Computational Linguistics, 62--70. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Hearst, M. A. Search user interfaces (1st ed). Cambridge University Press (2009). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Herman, I., Melançon, G., and Marshall, M. S. Graph Visualization and Navigation in Information Visualization: A Survey. IEEE Trans. on Visualization and Computer Graphics 6 (1), (2000) 24--43. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Jones, S. and Paynter, G. Topic-based browsing within a digital library using keyphrases. In Proceedings of the fourth ACM conference on Digital libraries (DL 1999), 114--121. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Kuhlthau, C. C. Inside the search process: Information seeking from the user's perspective. JASIS, 42 (5), (1991) 361--371.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Marchionini, G. Exploratory search: from finding to understanding. CACM, 49, (2006) 41--46. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Microsoft Research. (2013). Microsoft Academic Search. http://academic.research.microsoft.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Tang, J., Zhang, J., Yao, L., Li, J., Zhang, L., and Su, Z. ArnetMiner: extraction and mining of academic social networks. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining (KDD 2008), 990--998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SIGDOC '14: Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on The Design of Communication CD-ROM
    September 2014
    137 pages
    ISBN:9781450331838
    DOI:10.1145/2666216

    Copyright © 2014 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 27 September 2014

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • tutorial
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    SIGDOC '14 Paper Acceptance Rate23of38submissions,61%Overall Acceptance Rate355of582submissions,61%
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader