skip to main content
10.1145/2647868.2654952acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Validating an iOS-based Rhythmic Auditory Cueing Evaluation (iRACE) for Parkinson's Disease

Authors Info & Claims
Published:03 November 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Movement disorders such as Parkinson's disease (PD) will affect a rapidly growing segment of the population as society continues to age. Rhythmic Auditory Cueing (RAC) is a well-supported evidence-based intervention for the treatment of gait impairments in PD. RAC interventions have not been widely adopted, however, due to limitations in access to personnel, technological, and financial resources. To help "scale up" RAC for wider distribution, we have developed an iOS-based Rhythmic Auditory Cueing Evaluation (iRACE) mobile application to deliver RAC and assess motor performance in PD patients. The touchscreen of the mobile device is used to assess motor timing during index finger tapping, and the device's built-in tri-axial accelerometer and gyroscope to assess step time and step length during walking. Novel machine learning-based gait analysis algorithms have been developed for iRACE, including heel strike detection, step length quantification, and left-versus-right foot identification. The concurrent validity of iRACE was assessed using a clinic-standard instrumented walking mat and a pair of force-sensing resistor sensors. Results from 10 PD patients reveal that iRACE has low error rates (<±1.0%) across a set of four clinically relevant outcome measures, indicating a potentially useful clinical tool.

References

  1. P. Arias and J. Cudeiro. Effects of rhythmic sensory stimulation (auditory, visual) on gait in Parkinson's disease patients. Exp. Brain Res., 186(4):589--601, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. B. Bilney, M. Morris, and K. Webster. Concurrent related validity of the GAITRite walkway system for quantification of the spatial and temporal parameters of gait. Gait & Posture, 17(1):68--74, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. C. M. Bishop. Pattern recognition and machine learning. Springer, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. J. M. Bland and D. G. Altman. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 8(2):135--160, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. F. Bugané, M. Benedetti, et al. Estimation of spatial-temporal gait parameters in level walking based on a single accelerometer. Comp Meth and Prog in Biomed, 108(1):129--137, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. H. K. Chan, H. Zheng, et al. Feasibility study on iPhone accelerometer for gait detection. In Proc. PervasiveHealth, pages 184--187. IEEE, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. N. de Bruin, J. B. Doan, et al. Walking with music is a safe and viable tool for gait training in Parkinson's disease: the effect of a 13-week feasibility study on single and dual task walking. Parkinson's Disease, 2010, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. N. de Bruin, J. B. Doan, G. Turnbull, et al. Walking with music is a safe and viable tool for gait training in Parkinson's disease. Parkinson's Disease, 2010, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. M. F. del Olmo and J. Cudeiro. Temporal variability of gait in Parkinson disease: Effects of a rehabilitation programme based on rhythmic sound cues. Parkinsonism & Related Disorders, 11(1):25--33, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. H. T. Dinh, C. Lee, D. Niyato, and P. Wang. A survey of mobile cloud computing: architecture, applications, and approaches. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 13(18):1587--1611, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. E. Dorsey, R. Constantinescu, J. Thompson, et al. Projected number of people with Parkinson disease in the most populous nations, 2005 through 2030. Neurology, 68(5):384--386, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. C. G. Goetz, S. Fahn, et al. Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS): Process, format, and clinimetric testing plan. Movement Disorders, 22(1):41--47, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Y. A. Grimbergen, M. Munneke, and B. R. Bloem. Falls in Parkinson's disease. Current Opinion in Neurology, 17(4):405--415, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. J. M. Hausdorff. Gait dynamics, fractals and falls: finding meaning in the stride-to-stride fluctuations of human walking. Human Movement Science, 26(4):555--589, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. J. M. Hausdorff. Gait dynamics in Parkinson's disease: common and distinct behavior among stride length, gait variability, and fractal-like scaling. Chaos: Interdiscipl J Nonlinear Sci, 19(2):026113, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. J. M. Hausdorff, Z. Ladin, and J. Y. Wei. Footswitch system for measurement of the temporal parameters of gait. J Biomechanics, 28(3):347--351, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. J. H. Hollman, E. M. McDade, and R. C. Petersen. Normative spatiotemporal gait parameters in older adults. Gait & Posture, 34(1):111--118, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. T.-V. How, J. Chee, E. Wan, and A. Mihailidis. Mywalk: a mobile app for gait asymmetry rehabilitation in the community. In Proc. Pervasive Health, pages 73--76. ICST, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. J. J. Kavanagh and H. B. Menz. Accelerometry: a technique for quantifying movement patterns during walking. Gait & Posture, 28(1):1--15, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. S. H. Keus, M. Munneke, et al. Physical therapy in Parkinson's disease: evolution and future challenges. Movement Disorders, 24(1):1--14, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. R. LeMoyne, T. Mastroianni, and W. Grundfest. Wireless accelerometer iPod application for quantifying gait characteristics. In Proc. EMBC, pages 7904--7907. IEEE, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. I. v. Lim, E. Van Wegen, et al. Effects of external rhythmical cueing on gait in patients with Parkinson's disease: a systematic review. Clin Rehab, 19(7):695--713, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. S. Lord, K. Baker, et al. Gait variability in Parkinson's disease: an indicator of non-dopaminergic contributors to gait dysfunction? J Neurol, 258(4):566--572, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. S. Lord, T. Howe, et al. Gait variability in older adults: a structured review of testing protocol and clinimetric properties. Gait & Posture, 34(4):443--450, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. M. E. McNeely, R. P. Duncan, and G. M. Earhart. Medication improves balance and complex gait performance in Parkinson disease. Gait & Posture, 36(1):144--148, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. S. Mellone, C. Tacconi, and L. Chiari. Validity of a smartphone-based instrumented Timed Up and Go. Gait & Posture, 36(1):163--165, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. H. B. Menz, M. D. Latt, et al. Reliability of the GAITRite walkway system for the quantification of temporo-spatial parameters of gait in young and older people. Gait & Posture, 20(1):20--25, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. H. B. Menz, S. R. Lord, and R. C. Fitzpatrick. Acceleration patterns of the head and pelvis when walking are associated with risk of falling in community-dwelling older people. J Gerontology Series A: Bio Sci and Med Sci, 58(5):M446--M452, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. R. Moe-Nilssen. A new method for evaluating motor control in gait under real-life environmental conditions. part 1: The instrument. Clin Biomech, 13(4):320--327, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. T. B. Moeslund, A. Hilton, and V. Krüger. A survey of advances in vision-based human motion capture and analysis. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 104(2):90--126, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. S. Nishiguchi, M. Yamada, et al. Reliability and validity of gait analysis by Android-based smartphone. Telemedicine and e-Health, 18(4):292--296, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. C. W. Olanow, Y. Agid, et al. Levodopa in the treatment of Parkinson's disease: current controversies. Movement Disorders, 19(9):997--1005, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. C. Pacchetti, F. Mancini, et al. Active music therapy in Parkinson's disease: an integrative method for motor and emotional rehabilitation. Psychosomatic Medicine, 62(3):386--393, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. L. Palmerini, S. Mellone, L. Rocchi, and L. Chiari. Dimensionality reduction for the quantitative evaluation of a smartphone-based Timed Up and Go test. In Proc. EMBC, pages 7179--7182. IEEE, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. M. Plotnik, N. Giladi, and J. M. Hausdorff. A new measure for quantifying the bilateral coordination of human gait. Exp. Brain Res, 181(4):561--570, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. T. C. Rubinstein, N. Giladi, and J. M. Hausdorff. The power of cueing to circumvent dopamine deficits: a review of physical therapy treatment of gait disturbances in Parkinson's disease. Movement Disorders, 17(6):1148--1160, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Y. Song, S. Shin, S. Kim, D. Lee, and K. Lee. Speed estimation from a tri-axial accelerometer using neural networks. In Proc. EMBC, pages 3224--3227, Aug 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. S. J. Spaulding, B. Barber, et al. Cueing and gait improvement among people with Parkinson's disease: A meta-analysis. Archives Phys Med and Rehab, 94(3):562--570, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. D. H. Sutherland. The evolution of clinical gait analysis part III{kinetics and energy assessment. Gait & Posture, 21(4):447--461, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. A. L. Taylor Tavares, G. S. Jefferis, et al. Quantitative measurements of alternating finger tapping in Parkinson's disease correlate with UPDRS motor disability and reveal the improvement in fine motor control from medication and deep brain stimulation. Movement Disorders, 20(10):1286--1298, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. K. E. Webster, J. E. Wittwer, and J. A. Feller. Validity of the GAITRite walkway system for the measurement of averaged and individual step parameters of gait. Gait & Posture, 22(4):317--321, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. M. Yamada, T. Aoyama, et al. Using a smartphone while walking: a measure of dual-tasking ability as a falls risk assessment tool. Age and Ageing, 40(4):516--519, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. M. Yang, H. Zheng, et al. Assessing the utility of smart mobile phones in gait pattern analysis. Health and Technology, 2(1):81--88, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. M. Yang, H. Zheng, et al. igait: An interactive accelerometer based gait analysis system. Comp Meth and Prog in Biomed, 108(2):715--723, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. S. Zhu, H. Anderson, and Y. Wang. A real-time on-chip algorithm for IMU-based gait measurement. In Advances in Multimedia Information Processing PCM 2012, pages 93--104. Springer, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. W. Zijlstra. Assessment of spatio-temporal parameters during unconstrained walking. European J Applied Physiology, 92(1--2):39--44, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. W. Zijlstra and A. L. Hof. Assessment of spatio-temporal gait parameters from trunk accelerations during human walking. Gait & Posture, 18(2):1--10, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Validating an iOS-based Rhythmic Auditory Cueing Evaluation (iRACE) for Parkinson's Disease

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        MM '14: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM international conference on Multimedia
        November 2014
        1310 pages
        ISBN:9781450330633
        DOI:10.1145/2647868

        Copyright © 2014 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 3 November 2014

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        MM '14 Paper Acceptance Rate55of286submissions,19%Overall Acceptance Rate995of4,171submissions,24%

        Upcoming Conference

        MM '24
        MM '24: The 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia
        October 28 - November 1, 2024
        Melbourne , VIC , Australia

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader