skip to main content
article
Free Access

Predictive engineering models based on the EPIC architecture for a multimodal high-performance human-computer interaction task

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 September 1997Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Engineering models of human performance permit some aspects of usability of interface designs to be predicted from an analysis of the task, and thus they can replace to some extent expensive user-testing data. We successfully predicted human performance in telephone operator tasks with engineering models constructed in the EPIC (Executive Process-Interactive Control) architecture for human information processing, which is especially suited for modeling multimodal, complex tasks, and has demonstrated success in other task domains. Several models were constructed on an a priori basis to represent different hypotheses about how operators coordinate their activities to produce rapid task performance. The models predicted the total time with useful accuracy and clarified some important properties of the task. The best model was based directly on the GOMS analysis of the task and made simple assumptions about the operator's task strategy, suggesting that EPIC models are a feasible approach to predicting performance in multimodal high-performance tasks.

References

  1. ABRAMS, R. A., MEYER, D. E., AND KORNBLUM, S. 1990. Eye-hand coordination: eculomotor control in rapid aimed limb movements. J. Exper. Psychol. Human Percept. Perf. 16, 2, 248-267.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. ANDERSON, J.R. 1976. Language, Memory, and Thought. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. ANDERSON, J. R. 1987. Skill acquisition: Compilation of weak-method problem solutions. Psychol. Rev. 94, 192-210.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. ANDERSON, J.R. 1993. Rules of the Mind. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. BOVAIR, S., KIERAS, D. E., AND POLSON, P.G. 1990. The acquisition and performance of text editing skill: A cognitive complexity analysis. Human-Comput. Interact. 5, 1-48.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. CARD, S. K., MORAN, T. P., AND NEWELL, A. 1983. The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. GRAY, W. D., JOHN, B. E., AND ATWOOD, M. E. 1993. Project Ernestine: A validation of GeMS for prediction and explanation of real-world task performance. Human-Comput. Interact. 8, 3, 209-237.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. HALLETT, P.E. 1986. Eye movements. In Handbook of Perception and Human Performance, K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, and J. P. Thomas, Eds. Vol. 1. Wiley, New York, 10-1-10-112.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. JOHN, B. E. 1996. TYPIST: A theory of performance in skilled typing. Human-Comput. Interact. 11,321-355. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. JOHN, B. E. AND KmRAS, D.E. 1996a. Using GeMS for user interface design and evaluation: Which technique? ACM Trans. Comput.-Human Interact. 3, 4 (Dec.), 287-319. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. JOHN, B. E. ANn KmRAS, D. E. 1996b. The GOMS family of user interface analysis techniques: Comparison and contrast. ACM Trans. Comput.-Human Interact. 3, 4 (Dec.), 320-351. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. KIERAS, D. E. 1988. Towards a practical GOMS model methodology for user interface design. In Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, M. Helander, Ed. North-Holland Elsevier, Amsterdam, 135-158.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. KIERAS, D. E. 1998. A Guide to GOMS model usability evaluation using NGOMSL. In Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, M. Helander, T. Landauer, and P. Prabhu, Eds. 2nd ed. North-Holland, Amsterdam. To be published.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. KIERAS, D. E. ANn MEYER, D.E. 1997. An overview of the EPIC architecture for cognition and performance with application to human-computer interaction. Human-Comput. Interact. To be published. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. KIERAS, D. E. ANn POLSON, P. G. 1985. An approach to the formal analysis of user complexity. Int. J. Man-Mach. Stud. 22, 365-394.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. KIERAS, D. E., WOOD, S. D., ANn MEYER, D.E. 1995. Predictive engineering models using the EPIC architecture for a high-performance task. In Proceedings of CHI (Denver, Colo., May 7-11). ACM, New York. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. LAIRD, J., ROSENBLOOM, P., ANn NEWELL, A. 1986. Universal Subgoaling and Chunking. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Mass. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. MEYER, D. E. ANn KmRAS, D. E. 1997a. A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms. Psychol. Rev. 104, 3-65.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. MEYER, D. E. ANn KmRAS, D. E. 1997b. A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 2. Accounts of psychological refractory-period phenomena. Psychol. Rev. To be published.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. MCMILLAN, G. R., BEEWS, D., SALAS, E., STRUB, M. H., SUTTON, R., ANn VAN BREDA, L. 1989. Applications of Human Performance Models to System Design. Plenum Press, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. ROSENBAUM, D.h. 1991. Human Motor Control. Academic Press, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Predictive engineering models based on the EPIC architecture for a multimodal high-performance human-computer interaction task

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
        ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction  Volume 4, Issue 3
        Sept. 1997
        112 pages
        ISSN:1073-0516
        EISSN:1557-7325
        DOI:10.1145/264645
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 1997 ACM

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 1 September 1997
        Published in tochi Volume 4, Issue 3

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • article

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader