skip to main content
10.1145/2632048.2632068acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesubicompConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Exploring delegate engagement with an augmented conference

Published:13 September 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

We describe a qualitative study of delegate engagement with technology in academic conferences through a large-scale deployment of prototype technologies. These deployments represent current themes in conference technologies, such as providing access to content and opportunities for socialising between delegates. We consider not just the use of individual technologies, but also the overall impact of an assemblage of interfaces, ranging from ambient to interactive and mobile to situated. Based on a two-week deployment followed by interviews and surveys of attendees, we discuss the ways in which delegates engaged with the prototypes and the implications this had for their experience of the conferences. From our findings, we draw three new themes to inform the development of future conference technologies.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

p833-taylor.mov

mov

124.8 MB

References

  1. Ardito, C., Constabile, M. F. Lanzilotti, R., De Angeli, A. and Desolda, G. A field study of a multi-touch display at a conference. Proc. AVI 2012, ACM (2012), 580--587. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Benford, S., Giannachi, G., Koleva, B. and Rodden, T. From interaction to trajectories: designing coherent journeys through user experiences. Proc. CHI 2009, ACM (2009), 709--718. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Borovoy, R, Martin, F., Vemuri, S., Resinick, M., Silverman, B. and Hancock, C. Meme tags and community mirrors: moving from conferences to collaboration. Proc. CSCW 1998, ACM (1998), 159--168. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Braun, V. and Clarke, V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 77 (2006), 77--101.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Brignull, H. and Rogers, Y. Enticing people to interact with large public displays in public spaces. Proc. INTERACT 2003, IOS Press (2003), 17--24.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Buzeck, M. and Müller, J. TwitterSigns: microblogging on the walls. Proc. MM 2010, ACM (2010), 819--822. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Chuchill, E., Girgensohn, A., Nelson, L. and Lee, A. Blending digital and physical spaces for ubiquitous community participation. Communications of the ACM 47, 2 (2004), 38--44. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Cox, D., Kindratenko, V. and Pointer, D. IntelliBadge#8482;: towards providing location-aware value-added services at academic conferences. Proc. UbiComp 2003, Springer (2003), 264--280.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Dalsgaard, P., Dindler, C. and Halskov, K. Understanding the dynamics of engaging interaction in public spaces. Proc. INTERACT 2011, Springer (2011), 212--229. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Dey, A. K., Salber, D., Abowd, G. D, Futakawa, M., The Conference Assistant: combining context-awareness with wearable computing. Proc. ISWC 1999, IEEE (1999), 21--28. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Dörk, M., Gruen, D., Williamson, C. and Carpendale, S. A visual backchannel for large-scale events. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 16, 6 (2010), 1129--1138. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Farnham, S. D., Brown, P. T., Schwartz, J. L. K. Leveraging social software for social networking and community development at events. Proc. C&T 2009, ACM (2009), 245--244. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Gaver, W. W., Beaver, J. and Benford, S. Ambiguity as a resource for design. Proc. CHI 2003, ACM (2003), 233--240. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Harry, D., Green, J. and Donath, J. backchannel.nl: integrating backchannels in physical space. Proc. CHI 2009, ACM (2009), 1361--1370. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Hope, T., Hamasaki, M., Matsuo, Y., Nakamura, Y., Fujimura, N. and Nishimura, T. Doing community: co-construction of meaning and use with interactive information kiosks. Proc. UbiComp 2006, Springer (2006), 387--403. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Hutchinson, H., Mackay, W., Westerlund, B. B., Druin, A., Plaisant, C., Beaudouin-Lafon, M., Conversy, S., Evans, H., Hansen, H., Roussel, N., Eiderbäck, B., Lindquist, S. and Sundblad, Y. Technology probes: inspiring design for and with families. Proc. CHI 2003, ACM (2003), 17--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Kules, B., Kang, H., Plaisant, C., Rose, Anne and Shneiderman, B. Immediate usability: a case study of public access design for a community photo library. Interacting with Computers 16, 6 (2004) 1171--1193.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. McCarthy, J. F., McDonald, D. W., Soroczak, S., Nguyen, D. H. and Rashid, A. M. Augmenting the social space of an academic conference. Proc. CSCW 2004, ACM (2004), 39--48. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. McCarthy, J. F. and boyd, d.m. Digital backchannels in shared physical spaces: experiences at an academic conference. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2005, ACM (2005), 1641--1644. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Munson, S. A., Rosengren, E. and Resnick, P. Thanks and tweets: comparing two public displays. Proc. CSCW 2011, ACM (2011), 331--340. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Rekimoto, J., Ayatsuka, Y., Uoi, H. and Arai, T. Adding another communications channel to reality: an experience with a chat-augmented conference. Ext. Abstracts CHI 1998, ACM (1998), 271--272. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Salomon, G. B. Designing casual-user hypertext: the CHI'89 InfoBooth. Proc. CHI 1990, ACM (1990), 451--458. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Schroeter, R., Foth, M. and Satchell, C. People, content, location: sweet spotting urban screens for situated engagement. Proc. DIS 2012, ACM (2012), 146--155. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Storz, O., Friday, A. and Davies, N. Supporting content scheduling on situated public displays. Computers & Graphics 30, 5 (2006), 681--691.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Tam, D. K., MacLean K. E, McGrenere, J. and Kuchenbecker, K. J. The design and field observation of a haptic notification system for timing awareness during oral presentations. Proc. CHI 2013, ACM (2013), 1689--1698. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Tang, A., Finke, M., Blackstock, M., Leung, R., Deutscher, M. and Lee, R. Designing for bystanders: reflections on building a public digital forum. Proc. CHI 2008, ACM (2008), 879--822. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Exploring delegate engagement with an augmented conference

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      UbiComp '14: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing
      September 2014
      973 pages
      ISBN:9781450329682
      DOI:10.1145/2632048

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 13 September 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate764of2,912submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader