skip to main content
10.1145/2630407.2630411acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesegConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

3D geological modeling using sketches and annotations from geologic maps

Published:08 August 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Constructing 3D geological models is a fundamental task in oil/gas exploration and production. A critical stage in the existing 3D geological modeling workflow is moving from a geological interpretation (usually 2D) to a 3D geological model. The construction of 3D geological models can be a cumbersome task mainly because of the models' complexity, and inconsistencies between the interpretation and modeling tasks. To narrow the gap between interpretation and modeling tasks, we propose a sketched based approach. Our main goal is to mimic how domain experts interpret geological structures and allow the creation of models directly from the interpretation task, therefore avoiding the drawbacks of a separate modeling stage. Our sketch-based modeler is based on standard annotations of 2D geological maps and on geologists' interpretation sketches. Specific geological rules and constraints are applied and evaluated during the sketch-based modeling process to guarantee the construction of a valid 3D geologic model.

References

  1. Amorim, R., Brazil, E. V., Patel, D., and Sousa, M. C. 2012. Sketch modeling of seismic horizons from uncertainty. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Sketch-Based Interfaces and Modeling, Eurographics Association, Aire-la-Ville, Switzerland, Switzerland, SBIM '12, 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Anthony, L., and Wobbrock, J. O. 2010. A lightweight multistroke recognizer for user interface prototypes. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2010, Canadian Information Processing Society, GI '10, 245--252. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Anthony, L., and Wobbrock, J. O. 2012. $n-protractor: a fast and accurate multistroke recognizer. In Proceedings of the 2012 Graphics Interace Conference, Canadian Information Processing Society, GI '12, 117--120. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bolton, T. 1989. Geological Maps: Their Solution and Interpretation. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bond, C. E., Gibbs, A. D., Shipton, Z. K., and Jones, S. 2007. What do you think this is? "conceptual uncertainty" in geoscience interpretation. GSA Today 17, 4--10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Caumon, G., Collon-Drouaillet, P., Viseur, S., and Sausse, J. 2009. Surface-based 3d modeling of geological structures. Mathematical Geosciences 41, 927--945.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Cherlin, J. J., Samavati, F., Sousa, M. C., and Jorge, J. A. 2005. Sketch-based modeling with few strokes. In Proceedings of the 21st spring conference on Computer graphics, ACM, New York, NY, USA, SCCG '05, The Eurographics Association, 137--145. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Davis, G. H., and Reynolds, S. J. 1996. Structural Geology of Rocks and Regions, third ed. John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Donaldson, K., and Hopkins, E. 2003. Digital conversion of geologic maps pendleton county, west virginia. Tech. rep., West Virginia University, Department of Geology and Geography, September.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Donmez, N., and Singh, K. 2012. Concepture: a regular language based framework for recognizing gestures with varying and repetitive patterns. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Sketch-Based Interfaces and Modeling, Eurographics Association, SBIM '12, 29--37. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Dulac, J.-C. 2011. Technology enhances 3-d modeling. The American Oil & Gas Reporter (july).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Evans, S. 2003. The last integration frontier. E&P February.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Fossen, H. 2010. Structural Geology. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Garnier, B., Ormand, C., Chang, M., Tikoff, B., Shipley, T., and Forbus, K., 2014. Using cogsketch to increase sketching and spatial skill development in geoscience classrooms. The Spatial Intelligence and Learning Center (SILC) Showcase January 2014, National Science Foundation Science of Learning Center.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Glucksman, H. A. 1967. Classification of mixed-font alphabetics by characteristic loci. In 1967 Digest of 1st Annual IEEE Computer Conference, IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Hse, H., and Newton, A. R. 2004. Sketched symbol recognition using zernike moments. In International Conference on Pattern Recognition, 367--370. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Igarashi, T., Matsuoka, S., and Tanaka, H. 1999. Teddy: a sketching interface for 3d freeform design. In Proc. of SIGGRAPH '99, ACM, 409--416. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Johnson, W. E. 1976. Simple Geological Mapwork. Edward Arnold Publishers Limited.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Kara, L. B., and Stahovich, T. F. 2005. An image-based, trainable symbol recognizer for hand-drawn sketches. Comput. Graph. 29, 4 (Aug.), 501--517. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Lidal, E. M., Hauser, H., and Viola, I. 2012. Geological storytelling: graphically exploring and communicating geological sketches. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Sketch-Based Interfaces and Modeling, Eurographics Association, Aire-la-Ville, Switzerland, Switzerland, SBIM '12, 11--20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Lidal, E., Patel, D., Bendiksen, M., Langeland, T., and Viola, I. 2013. Rapid sketch-based 3d modeling of geology. In Workshop on Visualisation in Environmental Sciences (EnvirVis), The Eurographics Association, 31--35.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Lisle, R. J. 2004. Geological Structures and Maps: A Practical Guide. Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Maltman, A. 1990. Geological Maps: An Introduction. Open University Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Natali, M., Viola, I., and Patel, D. 2012. Rapid visualization of geological concepts. In Graphics, Patterns and Images (SIBGRAPI), 2012 25th SIBGRAPI Conference on, IEEE, 150--157. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Natali, M., Lidal, E. M., Parulek, J., Viola, I., and Patel, D. 2013. Modeling terrains and subsurface geology. In Eurographics 2013-State of the Art Reports, 155--173.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Nealen, A., Igarashi, T., Sorkine, O., and Alexa, M. 2007. Fibermesh: designing freeform surfaces with 3d curves. ACM Trans. Graph. 26, 3, 41--50. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Olsen, L., Samavati, F., and Jorge, J. 2011. Naturasketch: Modeling from images and natural sketches. Computer Graphics and Applications, IEEE 31, 6 (nov.-dec.), 24--34. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Orbay, G., and Kara, L. B. 2012. Sketch-based surface design using malleable curve networks. Computers & Graphics, 0, --. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Pereira, T., Brazil, E. V., Mactdo, I., Sousa, M. C., de Figueiredo, L. H., and Velho, L. 2011. Sketch-based warping of RGBN images. Graphical Models 73, 4, 97--110. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Platt, J. I., and Challinor, J. 1974. Simple Geological Structures. Thomas Murby & Co.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Spencer, E. 1993. Geologic Maps: A Practical Guide to The Interpretation and Preparation of Geologic Maps. MacMillan Publishing Company.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Tarbuck, E., Lutgens, F., and Tasa, D. 2011. Earth: An Introduction to Physical Geology. Pearson Prentice Hall.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Tesseract OCR, 2014. http://code.google.com/p/tesseract-ocr/. {Online; accessed 21-April-2014}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Treece, G. M., Prager, R. W., and Gee, A. H. 1999. Regularised marching tetrahedra: improved iso-surface extraction. Computers & Graphics 23, 4, 583--598.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Turner, A. 2006. Challenges and trends for geological modelling and visualisation. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment 65, 109--127.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. 3D geological modeling using sketches and annotations from geologic maps

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SBIM '14: Proceedings of the 4th Joint Symposium on Computational Aesthetics, Non-Photorealistic Animation and Rendering, and Sketch-Based Interfaces and Modeling
        August 2014
        35 pages
        ISBN:9781450330183
        DOI:10.1145/2630407

        Copyright © 2014 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 8 August 2014

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate20of36submissions,56%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader