skip to main content
10.1145/2598510.2598561acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Practicing somaesthetics: exploring its impact on interactive product design ideation

Published:21 June 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Somaesthetics has been adapted as a theoretical foundation for explaining the aesthetic experience of interaction. However, the practice of somaesthetics remains relatively unexplored in HCI, and it has potential to improve the ideation process of interactive product design by improving designers and developers' sensibility of haptic, dynamic, and invisible qualities of movements. We introduce somaesthetic reflection, a somatic introspection method in pragmatic somaesthetics, and explore its impact on the ideation through a practical workshop. This study revealed that somaesthetic reflection helps the participants experience and recognize unconscious movements and coordination of movements, which further contributes to discovery of design issues in the ideation, and more effective experience prototyping of interaction with moving products. The characteristics of the design approaches found in this study are discussed.

References

  1. Benford, S., Greenhalgh, C., Giannachi, G., Walker, B., Marshall, J., and Rodden, T. Uncomfortable Interactions. Proc. CHI'12, ACM Press (2012), 2005--2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Buchenau, M., and Fulton Suri, J. Experience prototyping. Proc. DIS'00, ACM Press (2000), 424--433. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Buur, J., Jensen, M.V., and Djajadiningrat, T. Hands-Only Scenarios and Video Action Walls - Novel Methods for Tangible User Interaction Design. Proc. DIS'04, ACM Press (2004), 185--192. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Dewey, J. Art as Experience. (1934). Pedigree.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Djajadiningrat, T., Wensveen, S., Frens, J., and Overbeeke, K. Tangible products: redressing the balance between appearance and action. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 8 (2004), 294--309. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Djajadiningrat, T., Matthews, B., and Stienstra, M. Easy Doesn't Do It: Skill and Expression in Tangible Aesthetics. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 11, 8 (2007), 657--67 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Feldenkrais, M. Embodied Wisdom: The Collected Papers of Moshe Feldenkrais. (2010). North Atlantic Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Ferreira, P., and Höök, K. Bodily orientations around mobiles: lessons learnt in Vanuatu. Proc. CHI'11, ACM Press (2011), p.277--286. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Fogtmann, M.H., Fritsch, J., and Kortbek, K.J. Kinesthetic Interaction - Revealing the Bodily Potential in Interaction Design. Proc. OZCHI'08, CHISIG (2008), p.89--96. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Fuchsberger, V., Murer, M., and Tscheligi, M. Materials, materiality, and media. Proc. CHI'13, ACM Press (2013), 2853--2862. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Hanna, T. Somatics. Addison-Wesley Publishing, (1988).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Höök, K. Transferring Qualities from Horseback Riding to Design. Proc. NordiCHI'10, ACM (2010), 226--235. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Hummels, C., Overbeeke, K. C. J., and Klooster, S. Move to Get Moved: a Search for Methods, Tools, and Knowledge to Design for Expressive and Rich Movement-Based interaction. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 11, 8 (2007), Springer-Verlag, 677--690. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. James, W. The Principles of Psychology. (1983). Harvard University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Jensen, M.V., Buur, J. and Djajadiningrat, T. Designing the User Actions in Tangible Interaction. Proc. CC'05, ACM Press (2005), 9--18. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Kim, D. and Lim, Y., "iSpace: Interactivity Expression for Self-Expression in an Online Communication Environment," Proc. DIS'12, ACM Press (2012), 210--219. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Larssen, A.T., Robertson, T., and Edwards, J. The Feel Dimension of Technology Interaction: Exploring Tangibles through Movement and Touch. Proc. TEI'07, ACM Press (2007), 271--278. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Lee, W., and Lim, Y. Explorative Research on the Heat as an Expression Medium: Focused on Interpersonal Communication, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 16 (2012), 1039--1049. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Levisohn, A., and Schiphorst, T. Embodied Engagement: Supporting Movement Awareness in Ubiquitous Computing Systems. Ubiquitous Learning: An International Journal, 3, 4 (2011), Common Ground.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Lim, Y.-K., Stolterman, E., Jung, H., and Donaldson, J. Interaction Gestalt and the Design of Aesthetic Interactions. Proc. DPPI'07, ACM Press (2007), 239--254. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Lim, Y., Lee, S., and Lee, K. Interactivity attributes: a new way of thinking and describing interactivity. Proc. CHI'09, ACM Press (2009), 105--108. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Lim, Y., Lee, S., and Kim, D. Interactivity attributes for expression-oriented interaction design, International Journal of Design, 5, 3 (2011), 113--128.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Loke, L., Khut, G.P., and Kocaballi, A.B. Bodily Experience and Imagination: Designing Ritual Interactions for Participatory Live-Art Contexts. Proc. DIS'12, ACM Press (2012), 779--788. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Loke, L., and Robertson, T. Moving and Making Strange: An Embodied Approach to Movement-Based Interaction Design. TOCHI, 20, 1 (2013), ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Löwgren, J., & Stolterman, E. Thoughtful interaction design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press (2004). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Merleau-Ponty, M. Phenomenology of Perception. Routledge (1962).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Moen, J. Towards People Based Movement Interaction and KinAesthetic Interaction Experiences. Proc. AARHUS'05, (2005), 121--124. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Moen, J. From Hand-Held to Body-Worn: Embodied Experiences of the Design and Use of a Wearable Movement-Based Interaction Concept. Proc. TEI'07, ACM Press (2007), 251--258. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Noë, A. Action in Perception. The MIT Press (2004).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Oulasvirta, A., Kurvinen, E., and Kankainen, T. Understanding contexts by being there: case studies in bodystorming. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 7 (2003), 125--134. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Peterson, M.G., Iversen, O.S., Krogh, P.G., and Ludvigsen, M. Aesthetic Interaction - A Pragmatist's Aesthetics of Interactive Systems. Proc. DIS'04, ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Ross, P.R. and Wensveen, S.A.G. Designing aesthetics of behavior in interaction: Using aesthetic experience as a mechanism for design. Int. J. Des. 4, 2 (2010), 3--13Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Sato, S., and Salvador, T. Methods & tools: Playacting and focus troupes: theatre techniques for creating quick, intense, immersive, and engaging focus group sessions. Interactions 6, 5 (1999), 35--41. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Segura, E. M., Waern, A., Moen, J., and Johansson, C. The Design Space of Body Games: Technological, Physical, and Social Design. Proc. CHI'13, ACM (2013), 3365--3374. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Schiphorst, T. exhale: (breath between bodies). SIGGRAPH'05, ACM Press (2005), 62--63. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Schiphorst, T. soft(n): Toward a Somaesthetics of Touch. Proc. CHI EA'09, ACM Press (2009), 2427--2438. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Schiphorst, T., Seo, J., and Jaffe, N. Exploring touch and breath in networked wearable installation design. Proc. MM'10, ACM Press (2010), p.1399--1400. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Schiphorst, T. Self-evidence: applying somatic connoisseurship to experience design, Proceedings of CHI Extended Abstracts'11, ACM (2011), p.145--160. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Schleicher, D., Jones, P., and Kachur, O. Bodystorming as Embodied Designing. Interactions 17, 6 (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Sheets-Johnstone, M. The Primacy of Movement. John Benjamins Publishing (1999).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Shusterman, R. Pragmatist Aesthetics: living beauty, rethinking art (2nd). Rowman & Littlefield (2000).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Shusterman, R. Body consciousness: a philosophy of mindfulness and somaesthetics. Cambridge University Press (2008).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Shusterman, R. Thinking through the body: essays in somaesthetics. Cambridge University Press (2012).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Shusterman, R. (2013): Somaesthetics. In: Soegaard, Mads and Dam, Rikke Friis (eds.). "The Encyclopedia 12of Human-Computer Interaction, 2nd Ed.". Aarhus, Denmark: The Interaction Design Foundation. Available online at http://www.interaction-design.org/encyclopedia/somaesthetics.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Sundström, P. et al. Experiential artifacts as a design method for somaesthetic service development. Proc. RDURP'11, ACM Press (2011), 33--36. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Sundström, P. et al. Inspirational Bits: Towards a Shared Understanding of the Digital Material. Proc. CHI'11, ACM Press (2011), 1561--1570. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Wright, P., and McCarthy, J. Empathy and Experience in HCI. Proc. CHI'08, ACM Press (2008), 637--646. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Wright, P., Wallace, J., and McCarthy, J. Aesthetics and Experience-Centered Design. TOCHI, 15, 4 (2008). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Practicing somaesthetics: exploring its impact on interactive product design ideation

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      DIS '14: Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems
      June 2014
      1102 pages
      ISBN:9781450329026
      DOI:10.1145/2598510

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 21 June 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      DIS '14 Paper Acceptance Rate107of402submissions,27%Overall Acceptance Rate1,158of4,684submissions,25%

      Upcoming Conference

      DIS '24
      Designing Interactive Systems Conference
      July 1 - 5, 2024
      IT University of Copenhagen , Denmark

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader