skip to main content
10.1145/2556288.2556979acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Pixel-based methods for widget state and style in a runtime implementation of sliding widgets

Authors Info & Claims
Published:26 April 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Pixel-based methods offer unique potential for modifying existing interfaces independent of their underlying implementation. Prior work has demonstrated a variety of modifications to existing interfaces, including accessibility enhancements, interface language translation, testing frameworks, and interaction techniques. But pixel-based methods have also been limited in their understanding of the interface and therefore the complexity of modifications they can support. This work examines deeper pixel-level understanding of widgets and the resulting capabilities of pixel-based runtime enhancements. Specifically, we present three new sets of methods: methods for pixel-based modeling of widgets in multiple states, methods for managing the combinatorial complexity that arises in creating a multitude of runtime enhancements, and methods for styling runtime enhancements to preserve consistency with the design of an existing interface. We validate our methods through an implementation of Moscovich et al.'s Sliding Widgets, a novel runtime enhancement that could not have been implemented with prior pixel-based methods.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

pn0198-file3.m4v

m4v

67.6 MB

References

  1. Albinsson, P.-A. and Zhai, S. High Precision Touch Screen Interaction. CHI 2003, 105--112. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Banovic, N., Grossman, T., Matejka, J., and Fitzmaurice, G. Waken: Reverse Engineering Usage Information and Interface Structure from Software Videos. UIST 2012, 83--92. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Baudisch, P. and Chu, G. Back-of-Device Interaction Allows Creating Very Small Touch Devices. CHI 2009, 1923--1932. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Benko, H., Wilson, A.D., and Baudisch, P. Precise Selection Techniques for Multi-Touch Screens. CHI 2006, 1263--1272. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Bolin, M., Webber, M., Rha, P., Wilson, T., and Miller, R.C. Automation andCustomizationofRenderedWebPages.UIST2005, 163--172. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Chang, T.-H., Yeh, T., and Miller, R. Associating the Visual Representation of User Interfaces with Their Internal Structures and Metadata. UIST 2011, 245--254. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Chang, T.-H., Yeh, T., and Miller, R.C. GUI Testing Using Computer Vision. CHI 2010, 1535--1544. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Dixon, M., Fogarty, J., and Wobbrock, J. A General-Purpose Target-Aware Pointing Enhancement Using Pixel-Level Analysis of Graphical Interfaces. CHI 2012, 3167--3176. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Dixon, M. and Fogarty, J. Prefab Layers and Prefab Annotations: Extensible Pixel-Based Interpretation of Graphical Interfaces. In Preparation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Dixon, M. and Fogarty, J. Prefab : Implementing Advanced Behaviors Using Pixel-Based Reverse Engineering of Interface Structure. CHI 2010, 1525--1534. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Dixon, M., Leventhal, D., and Fogarty, J. Content and Hierarchy in Pixel-Based Methods for Reverse Engineering Interface Structure. CHI 2011, 969--978. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Eagan, J.R., Beaudouin-Lafon, M., and Mackay, W.E. Cracking the Cocoa Nut: User Interface Programming at Runtime. UIST 2011, 225--234. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Edwards, W.K., Hudson, S.E., Marinacci, J., Rodenstein, R., Rodriguez, T., and Smith, I. Systematic Output Modification in a 2D User Interface Toolkit. UIST 1997, 151--158. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Fujima, J., Lunzer, A., Hornbæk, K., and Tanaka, Y. Clip, Connect, Clone: Combining Application Elements to Build Custom Interfaces for Information Access. UIST 2004, 175. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Gajos, K.Z., Wobbrock, J.O., and Weld, D.S. Automatically Generating User Interfaces Adapted To Users' Motor and Vision Capabilities. UIST 2007, 231--240. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Grossman, T. and Balakrishnan, R. The Bubble Cursor : Enhancing Target Acquisition by Dynamic Resizing of the Cursor's Activation Area. CHI 2005, 281--290. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Grossman, T., Matejka, J., and Fitzmaurice, G. Chronicle: Capture, Exploration, and Playback of Document Workflow Histories. UIST 2010, 143--152. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Hartmann, B., Wu, L., Collins, K., and Klemmer, S.R. Programming by a Sample: Rapidly Creating Web Applications with d.mix. UIST 2007, 241--250. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Hudson, S.E. and Smith, I. Supporting Dynamic Downloadable Appearances in an Extensible User Interface toolkit. UIST 1997, 159--168. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Hudson, S.E. and Tanaka, K. Providing Visually Rich Resizable Images for User Interface Components. UIST 2000, 227--235. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Hurst, A., Hudson, S.E., and Mankoff, J. Automatically Identifying Targets Users Interact with During Real World Tasks. IUI 2010, 11--20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Kumar, R., Talton, J.O., Ahmad, S., and Klemmer, S.R. Bricolage : Example-Based Retargeting for Web Design. CHI 2011, 2197--2206. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Little, G., Lau, T.A., Cypher, A., Lin, J., Haber, E.M., and Kandogan, E. Koala: Capture, Share, Automate, Personalize Business Processes on the Web. CHI 2007, 943--952. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Moscovich, T. Contact Area Interaction with Sliding Widgets. UIST, (2009), 13--22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Nichols, J., Hua, Z., and Barton, J. Highlight: A System for Creating and Deploying Mobile Web Applications. UIST 2008, 249--258. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Nichols, J. and Lau, T. Mobilization by Demonstration: Using Traces to Re-author Existing Web Sites. IUI 2008, 149--160. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Nichols, J., Myers, B. a., and Litwack, K. Improving Automatic Interface Generation with Smart Templates. IUI 2004, 286--288. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Olsen, D.R., Hudson, S.E., Verratti, T., Heiner, J.M., and Phelps, M. Implementing Interface Attachments Based on Surface Representations. CHI 1999, 191--198. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Olsen, D.R., Taufer, T., and Fails, J.A. ScreenCrayons: Annotating Anything. UIST 2004, 165--174. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Olwal, A., Feiner, S., and Heyman, S. Rubbing and Tapping for Precise and Rapid Selection on Touch-Screen Displays. CHI 2008, 295--304. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Pongnumkul, S., Dontcheva, M., Li, W., Wang, J., Bourdev, L., Avidan, S., and Cohen, M.F. Pause-and-Play: Automatically Linking Screencast Video Tutorials with Applications. UIST 2011, 135--144. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Potter, R. Triggers: Guiding Automation with Pixels to Achieve Data Access. A. Cypher, eds. MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Savva, M., Kong, N., Chhajta, A., Fei-fei, L., Agrawala, M., and Heer, J. ReVision : Automated Classification , Analysis and Redesign of Chart Images. UIST 2011, 393--402. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. St Amant, R., Lieberman, H., and Potter, R. Visual Generalization in Programming by Example. Communications of the ACM 43, 3 (2000), 107--114. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. St Amant, R., Riedl, R., Ritter, F.E., and Reifers, A. Image Processing in Cognitive Models with SegMan. HCII 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Stuerzlinger, W., Chapuis, O., Phillips, D., and Roussel, N. User Interface Façades: Towards Fully Adaptable User Interfaces. UIST 2006, 309--318. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Tan, D.S., Meyers, B., and Czerwinski, M. WinCuts : Manipulating Arbitrary Window Regions for More Effective Use of Screen Space. CHI 2004, 1525--1528. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Vogel, D. and Baudisch, P. Shift : A Technique for Operating Pen-Based Interfaces Using Touch. CHI 2007, 657--666. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Waldner, M., Steinberger, M., Grasset, R., and Schmalstieg, D. Importance-Driven Compositing Window Management: CHI 2011, 959--968. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Weldon, J. and Shneidermanss, B. Improving the Accuracy of Touch Screens: An Experimental Evaluation of Three Strategies. CHI 1988, 27--32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Wigdor, D., Forlines, C., Baudisch, P., Barnwell, J., and Shen, C. LucidTouch : A See-Through Mobile Device. CHI 2007, 269--278. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Yeh, T., Chang, T.-H., and Miller, R.C. Sikuli: Using GUI Screenshots for Search and Automation. UIST 2009, 183--194. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Yeh, T., Chang, T.-H., Xie, B., Walsh, G., Watkins, I., Wongsuphasawat, K., Huang, M., Davis, L.S., and Bederson, B.B. Creating Contextual Help for GUIs Using Screenshots. UIST 2011, 145--154. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Zettlemoyer, L.S. and St. Amant, R. A Visual Medium for Programmatic Control of Interactive Applications. CHI 1999, 199--206. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Zettlemoyer, L.S., Amant, R.S., and Dulberg, M.S. IBOTS : Agent Control Through the User Interface. IUI 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Pixel-based methods for widget state and style in a runtime implementation of sliding widgets

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '14: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2014
      4206 pages
      ISBN:9781450324731
      DOI:10.1145/2556288

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 26 April 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '14 Paper Acceptance Rate465of2,043submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader