Doug Terry
Skip Abstract Section
Abstract
A proposal to address the problem of too many conference submissions and not enough time for reviewers to carefully evaluate each one.
- Beaudouin-Lafon, M. Open access to scientific publications. Commun. ACM 53, 2 (Feb. 2012). Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Meyer, B., Choppy, C., Staunstrup, J., and van Leeuwen, J. Research evaluation for computer science. Commun. ACM 52, 4 (Apr. 2009). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Neylon, C. Reforming peer review. What are the practical steps?" (Mar. 8, 2011); http://cameronneylon.net/blog/reforming-peer-review-what-are-the-practical-steps/.Google Scholar
- Roman, D. Scholarly publishing model needs an update. Commun. ACM 54 (Jan. 2011). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rosenberger, J. Should computer scientists change how they publish?, BLOG@CACM (July 29, 2012).Google Scholar
- Vardi, M.Y. Revisiting the publication culture in computing research. Commun. ACM 53, 3 (Mar. 2010). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wallach, D.S. Rebooting the CS publication process. Commun. ACM 54, 10 (Oct. 2011). Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Publish now, judge later
Recommendations
Then and now in computer science education: the role of the CCSC---tutorial presentation
This tutorial presents the history of the CCSC as seen by its founder and supported by original documents. It traces the motivation and growth of the Consortium and will display 22 years of the Journal. Special attention will be directed to the ...
RESPECT Is Now a SIGCSE Conference
On behalf of ACM SIGCSE and the highly regarded RESPECT (Research on Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology) community, we are happy to announce that the RESPECT conference will now be integrated as one of the ...
Comments