skip to main content
research-article

There is more to IXPs than meets the eye

Published:04 November 2013Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Internet eXchange Points (IXPs) are generally considered to be the successors of the four Network Access Points (NAPs) that were mandated as part of the decommissioning of the National Science Foundation Network (NSFNET) in 1994/95 to facilitate the transition from the NSFNET to the "public Internet" as we know it today. While this popular view does not tell the whole story behind the early beginnings of IXPs, what is true is that since around 1994, the number of operational IXPs worldwide has grown to more than 300 (as of May 2013), with the largest IXPs handling daily traffic volumes comparable to those carried by the largest Tier-1 ISPs. However, IXPs have never really attracted much attention from the networking research community. At first glance, this lack of interest seems understandable as IXPs have apparently little to do with current "hot" topic areas such as data centers and cloud services or Software Defined Networking (SDN) and mobile communication. However, we argue in this article that, in fact, IXPs are all about data centers and cloud services and even SDN and mobile communication and should be of great interest to networking researchers interested in understanding the current and future Internet ecosystem. To this end, we survey the existing but largely fragmented sources of publicly available information about IXPs to describe their basic technical and operational aspects and highlight the critical differences among the various IXPs in the different regions of the world, especially in Europe and North America. More importantly, we illustrate the important role that IXPs play in today's Internet ecosystem and discuss how IXP-driven innovation in Europe is shaping and redefining the Internet marketplace, not only in Europe but increasingly so around the world.

References

  1. Akamai and AT&T Forge Global Strategic Alliance to Provide Content Delivery Network Solutions. http://www.akamai.com/html/about/press/releases/2012/press 120612.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. AMS-IX and DDoS. More-IP event, May 2013, http://www.more-ip-event.net/system/documents/6/original/TM-38 NB-DDoS.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. AMS-IX Caribbean. https://www.ams-ix.net/about/ams-ix-caribbean.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. AMS-IX Historical Timeline. https://www.ams-ix.net/about/history-background/historical-timeline.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. AMS-IX Hong Kong. https://www.ams-ix.net/about/ams-ix-hong-kong.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. AMS-IX Internet Peering. https://www.ams-ix.net/services-pricing/internet-peering.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. AMS-IX Mobile Peering. https://www.ams-ix.net/services-pricing/mobile-peering/grx.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. AMS-IX Route Servers. https://www.ams-ix.net/technical/specifications-descriptions/ams-ix-route-servers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. AT&T Company Information -- Networks. http://www.att.com/gen/investor-relations?pid=5711.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Attacks Used the Internet Against Itself to Clog Traffic. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/28/technology/attacks-on-spamhaus-used-internet-against-itself.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Can a DDoS break the Internet? Sure just not all of it. http://arstechnica.com/security/2013/04/can-a-ddos-break-the-internet-sure-just-not-all-of-it.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Data Center Map. http://www.datacentermap.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. DE-CIX Apollon. http://apollon.de-cix.net.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. DE-CIX Blackholing Support. http://www.de-cix.net/products-services/de-cix-frankfurt/blackholing/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. DE-CIX Expands Relationship with Equinix in Frankfurt. http://www.de-cix.net/news-events/latest-news/news/article/de-cix-expands-relationship-with-equinix-in-frankfurt.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. DE-CIX Hamburg. http://www.de-cix.net/products-services/de-cix-hamburg.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. DE-CIX Interconnecting IXPs: pros and cons. https://ripe64.ripe.net/presentations/80-e-an-20120418-RIPE64-Interconnecting-IXP.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. DE-CIX Munich. http://www.de-cix.net/products-services/de-cix-munich.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. DE-CIX Traffic Statistics. http://www.de-cix.net/about.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Deutsche Telekom International Carrier Sales & Solutions (ICSS) -- IP Transit. http://www.telekom-icss.com/iptransit.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Dutch Man Said to Be Held in Powerful Internet Attack. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/27/technologydutch-man-said-to-be-arrested-in-powerful-internet-attack.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. ECIX Launches First German 100GE Internet Exchange in Frankfurt. http://www.ecix.net/news/ecix-launches-first-german-100ge-internet-exchange-in-frankfurt.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. European Internet Exchange Association. https://www.euro-ix.net.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. European Internet Exchange Association 2012 Report on European IXPs. https://www.euro-ix.net/documents/1117-Euro-IX-IXP-Report-2012-pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Evolution of the Internet. http://www.cisco.com/cpress/cc/td/cpress/design/isp, CISCO Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Firm Is Accused of Sending Spam, and Fight Jams Internet. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/27/technology/internet/online-dispute-becomes-internet-snarling-attack.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Google Global Cache. http://ggcadmin.google.com/ggc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Google Peering and Content Delivery. https://peering.google.com/about/peering policy.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Internet traffic exchange: 2 billion users and it's done on a handshake. http://oecdinsights.org/2012/10/22/internet-traffic-exchange-2-billion-users-and-its-done-on-a-handshake.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. KT and Akamai Expand Strategic Partnership. http://www.akamai.com/html/about/press/releases/2013/press 032713.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. LINX: Black Holing Support for DDoS Attack. HotLINX 34, https://www.linx.net/files/hotlinx/hotlinx-34.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. LINX-NOVA. http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2013/08/27/london-internet-exchange-enters-us-market-with-evoswitch.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. LINX: Peer in the USA. HotLINX 34, https://www.linx.net/files/hotlinx/hotlinx-34.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Netflix Open Connect. https://signup.netflix.com/openconnect.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Open IX: Looking to establish the European exchange model in the United States. HotLINX 33, https://www.linx.net/files/hotlinx/hotlinx-33.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Orange and Akamai form Content Delivery Strategic Alliance. http://www.akamai.com/html/about/press/releases/2012/press 112012 1.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Packet Clearing House. https://www.pch.net.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. PeeringDB. https://www.peeringdb.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Platform Equinix: Where global business and growth connect. http://www.equinix.com/platform-equinix/platform-advantages/platform-equinix-overview/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Press Statement - Reason for LINX Outage 31 May 2012. https://www.linx.net/publicity/2012releases/pr2012-press-statement-310512.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Resilience of the Internet Interconnection Ecosystem. http://www.enisa.europa.eu/activities/Resilience-and-CIIP/critical-infrastructure-and-services/inter-x/interx/report.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. RIPE Routing Information Service. http://www.ripe.net/ris/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Routeviews Project, University of Oregon. http://www.routeviews.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Seattle Internet Exchange (SIX). http://www.seattleix.net/intro.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Spamhaus DDoS grows to Internet-threatening size. http://arstechnica.com/security/2013/03/spamhaus-ddos-grows-to-internet-threatening-size.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Swisscom and Akamai Enter Into a Strategic Partnership. http://www.akamai.com/html/about/press/releases/2013/press 031413.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. The DDoS That Almost Broke the Internet. http://blog.cloudflare.com/the-ddos-that-almost-broke-the-internet.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. UAE-IX. http://www.uae-ix.net.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. When spammers go to war: Behind the Spamhaus DDoS. http://arstechnica.com/security/2013/03/when-spammers-go-to-war-behind-the-spamhaus-ddos.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Position Statement on the Review of the International Telecommunication Regulations (ITRs). https://www.euro-ix.net/documents/1042-EuroIX-EC-WCIT-Position-Statement-pdf, October 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. A Next Generation 911 Cost Study. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs public/attachmatch/DOC-309744A1.pdf, May 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Internet Exchange Points. http://www.itu.int/en/wtpf-13/Documents/backgrounder-wtpf-13-ixps-en.pdf, May 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Promoting Internet Exchange Points (IXPs) as a long term solution to advance connectivity. http://www.itu.int/md/S13-WTPF13IEG3-C-0047/en, May 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Technology Transitions Policy Task Force Seeks Comment on Potential Trials. http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily Releases/ Daily Business/2013/db0510/DA-13-1016A1.pdf, May 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. B. Ager, N. Chatzis, A. Feldmann, N. Sarrar, S. Uhlig, and W. Willinger. Anatomy of a Large European IXP. In SIGCOMM, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. B. Augustin, B. Krishnamurthy, and W. Willinger. IXPs: Mapped? In IMC, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. M. Axelrod. The Value of Content Distribution Networks. AfNOG 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. J. Bailey, R. Clark, N. Feamster, D. Levin, J. Rexford, and S. Shenker. SDX: A Software Defined Internet Exchange. In Open Network Summit (Research Track), 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. J. Camilo, C. Restrepo, and R. Stanojevic. A history of an Internet eXchange Point. ACM CCR, 42(2), 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. H. Chang, R. Govindan, S. Jamin, S. Shenker, and W. Willinger. Towards Capturing Representative AS-Level Internet Topologies. Computer Networks, 44(6), 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. N. Chatzis, G. Smaragdakis, J. Boettger, T. Krenc, and A. Feldmann. On the Benefits of Using a Large IXP as an Internet Vantage Point. In IMC, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. Private communication.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. E. Gregori, A. Improta, L. Lenzini, and C. Orsini. The Impact of IXPs on the AS-Level Topology Structure of the Internet. Computer Communications, 34(1), 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. M. Hannigan and D. Temkin. Open IX. https://ripe66.ripe.net/presentations/281-oixp-marty-v2.pptx, RIPE 66, May 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Y. He, G. Siganos, M. Faloutsos, and S. Krishnamurthy. Lord of the Links: A Framework for Discovering Missing Links in the Internet Topology. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw., 17(2), 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. M. Jensen. Promoting the Use of Internet Exchange Points: A Guide to Policy, Management, and Technical Issues. http://www.internetsociety.org/internet-exchange-points-ixps, March 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. M. Kende and C. Hurpy. Assessment of the impact of Internet Exchange Points (IXPs). http://www.internetsociety.org/ixpimpact, April 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. E. Malecki. The Economic Geography of the Internets Infrastructure. Economic Geography, 78(4), 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. W. Norton. European vs. U.S. Internet Exchange Points. http://drpeering.net/white-papers/European-Vs-US-Internet-Exchange-Point-Model.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. W. Norton. Internet Exchange Point. http://drpeering.net/white-papers/Ecosystems/Internet-Exchange-Point.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. W. Norton. Modeling the Value of an Internet Exchange Point. http://drpeering.net/white-papers/ Modeling-the-value-of-an-Internet-Exchange-Point.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. W. Norton. The Art of Peering - The IX Playbook. http://drpeering. net/white-papers/Art-Of-Peering-The-IX-Playbook.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. R. Oliveira, D. Pei, W. Willinger, B. Zhang, and L. Zhang. The (In)completeness of the Observed Internet AS-Level Structure. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw., 18(1), 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  74. I. Pepelnjak. Could IXPs Use OpenFlow To Scale? MENOG-12, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  75. P. S. Ryan and J. Gerson. A Primer on Internet Exchange Points for Policymakers and Non-Engineers. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2128103, August 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. M. Sánchez, J. Otto, Z. Bischof, D. Choffnes, F. Bustamante, B. Krishnamurthy, and W. Willinger. Dasu: Pushing Experiments to the Internet's Edge. In NSDI, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  77. S. Silvius. Internet Exchange Points -- A closer look at the differences between continental Europe and the rest of the world. https://www.euro-ix.net/documents/894-ixp-research-pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. R. Stanojevic, I. Castro, and S. Gorinsky. CIPT: Using Tuangou to Reduce IP Transit Costs. In CoNEXT, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  79. R. Stapleton-Gray and W. Woodcock. National Internet Defense -- Small States on the Skirmish Line. CACM, 54(3), 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  80. F. Streibelt, J. Boettger, N. Chatzis, G. Smaragdakis, and A. Feldmann. Exploring EDNS-Client-Subnet Adopters in your Free Time. In IMC, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  81. D. Temkin. Open IX -- Seeking to improve IX usefulness in the US, NANOG 57, February 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  82. L. Vanbever. Novel Applications for a SDN-enabled Internet Exchange Point. SDN Research Group, IETF87, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  83. D. Weller and B. Woodcock. Internet Traffic Exchange: Market Developments and Policy Challenges. OECD Digital Economy Papers, http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/science-and-technology/ internet-traffic-exchange 5k918gpt130q-en.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  84. S. Worrall. Software Defined Networking for Service Providers -- Use Cases. CEE Peering Day 2013, http://www.peeringday.eu/media/document/12.-stephen-worrall.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  85. K. Xu, Z. Duan, Z.-L. Zhang, and J. Chandrashekar. On Properties of Internet Exchange Points and their Impact on AS Topology and Relationship. In Networking, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. There is more to IXPs than meets the eye

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review
        ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review  Volume 43, Issue 5
        October 2013
        27 pages
        ISSN:0146-4833
        DOI:10.1145/2541468
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2013 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 4 November 2013

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader