skip to main content
10.1145/2532748.2532758acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswipsceConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Measurement of pedagogical content knowledge: students' knowledge and conceptions

Published:11 November 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Almost 30 years ago, Shulman categorized the knowledge of teachers by several categories including the pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): "It represents the blending of content and pedagogy into an understanding of how particular topics, problems, or issues are organized, represented and adapted to the diverse interests and abilities of learners." [10]. The interest in research results dealing with this competency has increased in the last years. Several research projects have operationalized and measured the PCK for different subjects with notable results. They have shown discrepancies in teacher education, which need to be considered and overcome. Due to the young age of the subject computer science it will be interesting to obtain corresponding results in computer science education. In this article we present examples for test items measuring computer science teachers' PCK with main focus on the field of students' tasks and conceptions. They were developed on the base of the test instrument of the MoKoM project which was used in a large study investigating students' knowledge in computer science. Furthermore we will give an outlook on the setting of the assessment we are planning to conduct with these test items.

References

  1. L. W. Anderson and D. R. Krathwohl. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: a Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Longman, New York, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. M. Berges, P. Hubwieser, N. Schaper, E. Bender, M. Margaritis, J. Magenheim, S. Schubert, and L. Ohrndorf. Developing a Competency Model for Teaching Computer Science in Schools. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, pages 327--327, Canterbury, England, UK, 2013. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. A. Eckerdal, R. McCartney, J. E. Moström, M. Ratcliffe, K. Sanders, and C. Zander. Putting threshold concepts into context in computer science education. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 38(3):103, June 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. O. Hazzan, T. Lapidot, and N. Ragonis. Guide to Teaching Computer Science - An Activity-Based Approach. Springer, London, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. M. Jüttner and B. J. Neuhaus. Using empirically analyzed pupils' errors to develop a PCK test. In Contemporary science education research: preservice and inservice teacher education. A collection of papers presented at ESERA 2009 conference, pages 331--340. Pegem Akademi, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. S. Krauss, J. Baumert, and W. Blum. Secondary mathematics teachers' pedagogical content knowledge and content knowledge: validation of the COACTIV constructs. Zdm, 40(5):873--892, Oct. 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. J. Magenheim, J. Neugebauer, P. Stechert, L. Ohrndorf, B. Linck, S. Schubert, W. Nelles, and N. Schaper. Competence Measurement and Informatics Standards in Secondary Education. In Informatics in Schools: Sustainable Informatics Education for Pupils of all ages (ISSEP), 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. L. Ohrndorf. A taxonomy of errors for computer science education. In IFIP World Computer Congress WCCE 2013, Torun, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. S. Park and J. S. Oliver. Revisiting the Conceptualisation of Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK): PCK as a Conceptual Tool to Understand Teachers as Professionals. Research in Science Education, 38(3):261--284, June 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. L. S. Shulman. Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard educational review, 1987.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. M. Weigend. From intuition to programme. Informatics Education -The Bridge between Using and..., pages 117--126, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Measurement of pedagogical content knowledge: students' knowledge and conceptions

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          WiPSE '13: Proceedings of the 8th Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education
          November 2013
          141 pages
          ISBN:9781450324557
          DOI:10.1145/2532748

          Copyright © 2013 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 11 November 2013

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate104of279submissions,37%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader