ABSTRACT
We investigate how technology usage in homes has changed with the increasing prevalence of mobile devices including Tablets and Smart Phones. We logged Internet usage from 86 Belgium households to determine their six most common Internet Activities. Next, we surveyed households about what devices they own, how they share those devices, and which device they use for different Internet activities. We then conducted semi-structured interviews with 18 of 55 households that responded to the survey in which participants explained their device usage patterns and where they use technology in their home. Our findings suggest that the nature of online activity and social context influence device preference. Many participants reported that their Desktop PC is now a special purpose device, which they use only for specific activities such as working from home or online gaming. Compared to past studies, we observed technology use in many more locations in the home, most notably kitchens and bathrooms.
- Beauvisage, T. Computer Usage in Daily Life. In CHI '09 (2009), 575--584. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Beyer, H., and Holzblatt, K. Contextual Design. Morgan Kaufman, 1998.Google Scholar
- Brush, A. J., and Inkpen, K. M. Yours, Mine and Ours' Sharing and Use of Technology in Domestic Environments. In UbiComp '07 (2007), 109--126. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chetty, M., Banks, R., Brush, A. J., Donner, J., and Grinter, R. You're Capped : Understanding the Effects of Bandwidth Caps On Broadband use in the Home. In CHI '12 (2012), 3021--3030. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Frohlich, D., and Kraut, R. The Social Context of Home Computing. In Inside the Smart Home. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2003, 127--162.Google Scholar
- Grinter, R. E., Edwards, W. K., Newman, M. W., and Ducheneaut, N. The Work to Make a Home Network Work. In ECSCW '05 (2005), 469--488. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Himma, K. E. The Concept of Information Overload: A Preliminary Step in Understanding the Nature of a Harmful Information-Related Condition. Ethics and Information Technology 9, 4 (2007), 259--272. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ju, W., Hurwitz, R., Judd, T., and Lee, B. CounterActive: An Interactive Cookbook for the Kitchen Counter. In CHI EA '01 (2001), 269--270. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Karlson, A. K., Meyers, B. R., Jacobs, A., Johns, P., and Kane, S. K. Working Overtime: Patterns of Smartphone and PC Usage in the Day of an Information Worker. In Pervasive '09, vol. 5538 (2009), 398--405. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kaye, J. Love, Ritual and Video Chat. In The Connected Home: The Future of Domestic Life. Springer London, 2011, 185--202.Google Scholar
- Kraut, R., Scherlis, W., Mukhopadhyay, T., Manning, J., and Kiesler, S. The HomeNet Field Trial of Residential Internet Services. Communications of the ACM 39, 12 (1996), 55--63. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kumar, R., and Tomkins, A. A Characterization of Online Browsing Behavior (2010). 561--570. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Madden, M., Lenhart, A., Duggan, M., Cortesi, S., and Gasser, U. Teens and Technology 2013, Pew Internet & American Life Project.Google Scholar
- Mateas, M., Salvador, T., Scholtz, J., and Sorensen, D. Engineering Ethnography in the Home. In CHI EA '96, ACM Press (1996), 283--284. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nylander, S., Fådal, J., and Mottaghy, S. Couch Mobility: The Cell Phone's Most Important Feature at Home is Mobility. In CHI EA '12 (2012), 1973--1978. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Poole, E. S., Chetty, M., Morgan, T., Grinter, R. E., and Edwards, W. K. Computer Help at Home: Methods and Motivations for Informal Technical Support. In CHI 09 (2009), 739--748. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Randall, D. All in the Game: Families, Peer Groups and Game Playing in the Home. In The Connected Home: The Future of Domestic Life. Springer London, 2011, 111--131.Google Scholar
- Rattenbury, T., Nafus, D., and Anderson, K. Plastic: A Metaphor for Integrated Technologies. In UbiComp '08 (2008), 232--241. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rode, J. A. The Roles that Make the Domestic Work. In CSCW '10 (2010), 381--390. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Venkatesh, A., Duknle, D., and Wortman, A. Family Life, Children, and the Feminization of Computing. In The Connected Home: The Future of Domestic Life. Springer London, 2011, 59--76.Google Scholar
- Woodruff, A., Anderson, K., Mainwaring, S. D., and Aipperspach, R. Portable, but Not Mobile: A Study of Wireless Laptops in the Home (2007). 216--233. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wyche, S. P., Smyth, T. N., Chetty, M., Aoki, P. M., and Grinter, R. E. Deliberate Interactions : Characterizing Technology Use in Nairobi, Kenya. In CHI '10 (2010), 2593--2602. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Home computing unplugged: why, where and when people use different connected devices at home
Recommendations
Sabbath day home automation: "it's like mixing technology and religion"
CHI '07: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsWe present a qualitative study of 20 American Orthodox Jewish families' use of home automation for religious purposes. These lead users offer insight into real-life, long-term experience with home automation technologies. We discuss how automation was ...
Home automation in the wild: challenges and opportunities
CHI '11: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsVisions of smart homes have long caught the attention of researchers and considerable effort has been put toward enabling home automation. However, these technologies have not been widely adopted despite being available for over three decades. To gain ...
HomeLab: shared infrastructure for home technology field studies
UbiComp '12: Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous ComputingResearchers who develop new home technologies using connected devices (e.g. sensors) often want to conduct large-scale field studies in homes to evaluate their technology, but conducting such studies today is quite challenging, if not impossible. ...
Comments