skip to main content
10.1145/2470654.2466231acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

HeartLink: open broadcast of live biometric data to social networks

Published:27 April 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

A number of studies in the literature have looked into the use of real-time biometric data to improve one's own physiological performance and wellbeing. However, there is limited research that looks into the effects that sharing biometric data with others could have on one's social network. Following a period of research on existing mobile applications and prototype testing, we developed a system, HeartLink, which collects real-time personal biometric data such as heart rate and broadcasts this data online. Insights gained on designing systems to broadcast real-time biometric data are presented. In this paper we also report emerging results from testing HeartLink in a pilot study and a user study that were conducted during sport events. The results showed that sharing heart rate data does influence the relationship of the persons involved and that the degree of influence seems related to the tie strength prior to visualizing the data.

References

  1. Backstrom, L., Boldi, P., Rosa, M., Ugander, J., and Vigna, S. Four Degrees of Separation. WebSci 2012, (2012), 33--42. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Chamberlain, A., Crabtree, A., Rodden, T., Jones, M., and Rogers, Y. Research in the Wild: Understanding "In the Wild" Approaches to Design and Development. ACM Press (2012), 795--796. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Consolvo, S., Everitt, K., Smith, I., and Landay, J. A. Design requirements for technologies that encourage physical activity. CHI 2006, (2006), 457--466. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Eberle, B. Scamper On: More Creative Games and Activities for Imagination Development - Prufrock Press. 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Hallberg, J., Svensson, S., Ostmark, A., Lindgren, P., and Synnes, K. Enriched media-experience of sport events. WMCSA 2004, (2004). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Killeen, P. R. and Fetterman, J. G. A behavioral theory of timing. Psychological Review (1988), 274--295.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Klasnja, P. and Pratt, W. Healthcare in the pocket: Mapping the space of mobile-phone health interventions. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, (2011), 184--198. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Klasnja, P., Consolvo, S., McDonald, D. W., Landay, J. A., and Pratt, W. Using mobile & personal sensing technologies to support health behavior change in everyday life: lessons learned. AMIA 2009, (2009), 338--342.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Lin, J. J., Mamykina, L., Lindtner, S., Delajoux, G., and Strub, H. B. Fish'n'Steps: Encouraging Physical Activity with an Interactive Computer Game. Ubicomp 2006, (2006), 261--278. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Liu, C., Zhu, Q., Holroyd, K. A., and Seng, E. K. Status and trends of mobile-health applications for iOS devices: A developer's perspective. Journal of Systems and Software, (2011), 2022--2033. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Miluzzo, E., Lane, N. D., Fodor, K., and Peterson, R. Sensing meets mobile social networks. SenSys'08, (2008), 337--350. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Mueller, F., Vetere, F., Gibbs, M. R., Edge, D., Agamanolis, S., and Sheridan, J. G. Jogging over a distance between Europe and Australia. UIST'10 (2010), 189--198. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Munson, S. A. and Consolvo, S. Exploring goal-setting, rewards, self-monitoring, and sharing to motivate physical activity. Pervasive Health (2012), 25--32.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Newman, M. W., Lauterbach, D., Munson, S. A., Resnick, P., and Morris, M. E. It's not that I don't have problems, I'm just not putting them on Facebook: challenges and opportunities in using online social networks for health. CSCW 2011, (2011), 341--350. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Nicholls, J. The MCC decision matrix: a tool for applying strategic logic to everyday activity. Management decision 33, 6 (1995), 4--10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Petruzzello, S. J., Landers, D. M., and Salazar, W. Biofeedback and sport/exercise performance: Applications and limitations. Behavior therapy 22, (1991), 379--392.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Reis, H. T., Smith, S. M., Carmichael, C. L., et al. Are you happy for me? How sharing positive events with others provides personal and interpersonal benefits. Journal of personality and social psychology 99, 2 (2010), 311--329.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Sallis, J. F., Hovell, M. F., and Richard Hofstetter, C. Predictors of adoption and maintenance of vigorous physical activity in men and women. Preventive Medicine 21, 2 (1992), 237--251.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Schnädelbach, H., Rennick Egglestone, S., Reeves, S., Benford, S., Walker, B., and Wright, M. Performing thrill: designing telemetry systems and spectator interfaces for amusement rides. CHI 2008, (2008), 1167--1176. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Segerståhl, K. and Oinas-Kukkonen, H. Designing personal exercise monitoring employing multiple modes of delivery: Implications from a qualitative study on heart rate monitoring. International Journal of Medical Informatics, (2011), 203--213.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Shehab, M. and Marouf, S. Recommendation Models for Open Authorization. Dependable and Secure Computing 9, 4 (2012), 583--596. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Skeels, M. M., Unruh, K. T., Powell, C., and Pratt, W. Catalyzing social support for breast cancer patients. CHI 2010, (2010), 173--182. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Southern, J. Comobility: How Proximity and Distance Travel Together in Locative Media. Canadian Journal of Communication 37, (2012), 75--91.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Tennent, P., Martindale, S., Marshall, J., Reeves, S., Walker, B., and Harter, P. Performing The Experiment Live. CHI'12, (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Tennent, P., Reeves, S., Benford, S., et al. The machine in the ghost: augmenting broadcasting with biodata. CHI'12, (2012), 91--100. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Tosun, L. P. Motives for Facebook use and expressing "true self" on the Internet. Computers in Human Behavior 28, 4 (2012), 1510--1517. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Treiber, F. A., Baranowski, T., Braden, D. S., Strong, W. B., Levy, M., and Knox, W. Social support for exercise: relationship to physical activity in young adults. Preventive Medicine 20, 6 (1991), 737--750.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Wilson, C., Boe, B., Sala, A., Puttaswamy, K. P. N., and Zhao, B. Y. User interactions in social networks and their implications. EuroSys'09, (2009), 205--218. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Wilson, V. and Peper, E. Athletes Are Different: Factors That Differentiate Biofeedback/Neurofeedback for Sport Versus Clinical Practice. Biofeedback 39, 1 (2011), 27--30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. HeartLink: open broadcast of live biometric data to social networks

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '13: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2013
      3550 pages
      ISBN:9781450318990
      DOI:10.1145/2470654

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 27 April 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '13 Paper Acceptance Rate392of1,963submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader