Jisun An
ABSTRACT
Fact checking has been hard enough to do in traditional settings, but, as news consumption is moving on the Internet and sources multiply, it is almost unmanageable. To solve this problem, researchers have created applications that expose people to diverse opinions and, as a result, expose them to balanced information. The wisdom of this solution is, however, placed in doubt by this paper. Survey responses of 60 individuals in the UK and South Korea and in-depth structured interviews of 10 respondents suggest that exposure to diverse opinions would not always work. That is partly because not all individuals equally value opinion diversity, and mainly because the same individual benefits from it only at times. We find that whether one looks for diverse opinions largely depends on three factors--one's prior convictions, emotional state, and social context.
- Allport, G. W., and Postman, L. The Psychology of Rumor. Russell&Russell Pub, 2007.Google Scholar
- An, J., Cha, M., Gummadi, K., and Crowcroft, J. Media landscape in twitter: A world of new conventions and political diversity. In Proc. ICWSM (2011).Google Scholar
- Baron, R. S., Kerr, N. L., and Miller, N. Group process, group decision, group action. Open University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
- Earls, M. Herd: How to Change Mass Behaviour by Harnessing Our True Nature. John Wiley & Sons, 2007.Google Scholar
- Economist. Boxing with Fox. 2004.Google Scholar
- Economist. Political fact-checking: Fun at the FactFest. 2011.Google Scholar
- Festinger, L. A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press, 1957.Google Scholar
- Heath, C., Bell, C., and Sternberg, E. Emotional selection in memes: The case of urban legends. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81, 6 (2001).Google ScholarCross Ref
- Milyo, J., and Groseclose, T. A measure of media bias. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 120, 4 (2005).Google Scholar
- Munson, S., and Resnick, P. Presenting Diverse Political Opinions: How and How Much. In Proc. CHI (2010). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nyhan, B., and Reifler, J. When corrections fail: The persistence of political misperceptions. Political Behavior 32, 2 (2010).Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ross, L., Lepper, M., and Hubbard, M. Perseverance in self-perception and social perception: biased attributional processes in the debriefing paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 32, 5 (1975).Google Scholar
- Sunstein, C. R. On Rumors: How Falsehoods Spread, Why We Believe Them, What Can Be Done. Allen Lane, 2009.Google Scholar
- Todd, C., Murray, M., Montanaro, D., and Weinberg, A. First thoughts: Obama's good, bad news.Google Scholar
Recommendations
Presenting diverse political opinions: how and how much
CHI '10: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsIs a polarized society inevitable, where people choose to be exposed to only political news and commentary that reinforces their existing viewpoints? We examine the relationship between the numbers of supporting and challenging items in a collection of ...
Determining the sentiment of opinions
COLING '04: Proceedings of the 20th international conference on Computational LinguisticsIdentifying sentiments (the affective parts of opinions) is a challenging problem. We present a system that, given a topic, automatically finds the people who hold opinions about that topic and the sentiment of each opinion. The system contains a module ...
How personal task management differs across individuals
There has been a wealth of research on how individuals manage their tasks in general. However little to none has investigated whether, how, and why personal task management (PTM) behaviors differ across individuals. To fill this gap, we conducted two ...
Comments