skip to main content
10.1145/2460296.2460331acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageslakConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The pairing of lecture recording data with assessment scores: a method of discovering pedagogical impact

Published:08 April 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Web technologies, such as lecture recordings, have the capacity to capture and store massive amounts of data from individuals' online behavior. Such data can provide insight into student learning processes and the relationship between online trace data and academic performance alerting educators to when intervention may be required or if their learning activities may need to be adjusted. This paper discusses how data captured from students' use of lecture recordings accessed through a Collaborative Lecture Annotation System (CLAS) when aggregated and correlated with assessment data can help educators evaluate the impact of the recordings on their students' learning. Such information can help inform and alert educators to when adjustments may be required to their pedagogical approach.

References

  1. Brooks, C., Epp, C. D., Logan, G., and Greer, J. 2011. The who, what, when, and why of lecture capture. In Proceedings of the 1 st International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (Banff, Canada, February 27 - March 1, 2011). LAK'11. ACM, New York, NY, 9--17. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Foertsch, J., Moses, G., Strikwerda, and Litzkow, M. 2002. Reversing the lecture/homework paradigm using eTeach web-based streaming video software. Journal of Engineering Education, 91 (July 2002), 267--274.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Garrison, D. R. and Kanuka, H. 2004. Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. Internet High. Educ. 7, 2 (2nd Quarter 2004), 95--105.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Greller, W. and Drachsler, H. 2012. Translating learning into numbers: A generic framework for learning analytics. Educ. Technol. Soc. 15, 3, 42--57.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Houston, M. and Lin, L. 2012. Humanizing the classroom by flipping the homework versus lecture equation. In Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (Austin, Texas, USA, March 5--10, 2012). AACE, Chesapeake, VA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Mirriahi, N., Dawson, S., and Hoven, D. 2012. Identifying key actors for technology adoption in higher education: A social network approach. In Proceedings of ascilite Wellington, 2012 (Wellington, New Zealand, November 25--28, 2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Moses, G. and Litzkow, M. 2005. In-class active learning and frequent assessment reform of nuclear reactor theory course. In Frontiers in Education, 2005, Proceedings of the 35 th Annual Conference (October 19--22, 2005). FIE'05.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Norris, D., Baer, L, Leonard, J., Pugliese, L., and Lefrere, P. 2008. Action analytics: Measuring and improving performance that matters in higher education. Educause Review. 43, 1 (Jan./Feb. 2008), 42--67.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Phillips, R., Preston, G., Roberts, P., Cumming-Potvin, W., Herrington, J., Maor, D., and Gosper, M. 2010. Using academic analytic tools to investigate studying behaviours in technology-supported learning environments. In Proceedings of ascilite Sydney, 2010 (Sydney, Australia, December 5--10, 2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Prunuske, A. J., Batzli, J., Howell, E. and Miller, S. 2012. Using online lectures to make time for active learning. Genetics, 192, (September 2012), 67--72.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Risko, E. F., Foulsham, T., Dawson, S., and Kingstone, A. 2012. The collaborative lecture annotation system (CLAS): A new tool for distributed learning. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Scull, W. R, Kendrick, D., Shearer, R., and Offerman, D. 2011. The landscape of quality assurance in distance education. Continuing Higher Education Review. 75 (Fall 2011), 138--149.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. The pairing of lecture recording data with assessment scores: a method of discovering pedagogical impact

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          LAK '13: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge
          April 2013
          300 pages
          ISBN:9781450317856
          DOI:10.1145/2460296

          Copyright © 2013 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 8 April 2013

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          LAK '13 Paper Acceptance Rate16of58submissions,28%Overall Acceptance Rate236of782submissions,30%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader