skip to main content
10.1145/2422531.2422550acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessensysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Semi-automated modular modeling of buildings for model predictive control

Published:06 November 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

A promising alternative to standard control strategies for heating, ventilation, air conditioning and blinds positioning of buildings is Model Predictive Control (MPC). Key to MPC is having a sufficiently simple (preferably linear) model of the building's thermal dynamics.

In this paper we propose and test a general approach to derive MPC compatible models consisting of the following steps: First, we use standard geometry and construction data to derive in an automated way a physical first-principles based linear model of the building's thermal dynamics. This describes the evolution of room, wall, floor and ceiling temperatures on a per zone level as a function of external heat fluxes (e.g., solar gains, heating/cooling system heat fluxes etc.). Second, we model the external heat fluxes as linear functions of control inputs and predictable disturbances. Third, we tune a limited number of physically meaningful parameters. Finally, we use model reduction to derive a low-order model that is suitable for MPC.

The full-scale and low-order models were tuned with and compared to a validated EnergyPlus building simulation software model. The approach was successfully applied to the modeling of a representative Swiss office building. The proposed modular approach flexibly supports stepwise model refinements and integration of models for the building's technical subsystems.

References

  1. M. Gouda, S. Danaher, and C. Underwood. Building thermal model reduction using nonlinear constrained optimization. Building and Environment, 37(12): 1255--1265, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. D. Gyalistras and M. G. (Eds.). Use of weather and occupancy forecasts for optimal building climate control (OptiControl): Two years progress report. Technical report, ETH Zurich and Siemens Building Technologies Division, Siemens Switzerland Ltd., Zug, Switzerland, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. B. Lehmann, K. Wirth, S. Carl, V. Dorer, T. Frank, and M. Gwerder. Modeling of buildings and building systems. Technical report, 2009. in {2}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Y. Ma, F. Borrelli, B. Hencey, B. Coffey, S. Bengea, and P. Haves. Model predictive control for the operation of building cooling systems. Control Systems Technology, IEEE Transactions on, 20(3): 796--803, may 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. G. Masy. Definition and validation of a simplified multizone dynamic building model connected to heating system and HVAC unit. PhD thesis, Université de Liege, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. F. Oldewurtel, A. Parisio, C. Jones, D. Gyalistras, M. Gwerder, V. Stauch, B. Lehmann, and M. Morari. Use of model predictive control and weather forecasts for energy efficient building climate control. Energy and Buildings, 45:15--27, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. R. Perez, P. Ineichen, E. Maxwell, R. Seals, and A. Zelenka. Dynamic global-to-direct conversion models. ASHREA transactions, pages 254--369, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. S. Prívara, Z. Vana, D. Gyalistras, J. Cigler, C. Sagerschnig, M. Morari, and L. Ferkl. Modeling and identification of a large multizone office building. In Control Applications (CCA), 2011 IEEE International Conference on, pages 55--60, sept. 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. J. Rawlings and D. Mayne. Model Predictive Control: Theory and Design. Nob Hill Publishing, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. D. Sturzenegger. Bilinear modeling for model predictive control of an air handling unit. Technical report, ETH Zurich, 2012. www.control.ee.ethz.ch.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. J. Toedtli, M. Gwerder, B. Lehmann, and F. Renggli. TABS Control. faktor, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. J. Široký, F. Oldewurtel, J. Cigler, and S. Prívara. Experimental analysis of model predictive control for an energy efficient building heating system. Applied Energy, 88(9): 3079--3087, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. S. Wang and X. Xu. Parameter estimation of internal thermal mass of building dynamic models using genetic algorithm. Energy Conversion and Management, 47(1314): 1927--1941, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. R. Yao, N. Baker, and M. McEvoy. A simplified thermal resistance network model for building thermal simulation. In eSim, Montreal, Canada (2000), pages 135--140, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Semi-automated modular modeling of buildings for model predictive control

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      BuildSys '12: Proceedings of the Fourth ACM Workshop on Embedded Sensing Systems for Energy-Efficiency in Buildings
      November 2012
      227 pages
      ISBN:9781450311700
      DOI:10.1145/2422531

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 6 November 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate148of500submissions,30%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader