skip to main content
10.1145/2396636.2396647acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesissConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Investigating menu discoverability on a digital tabletop in a public setting

Authors Info & Claims
Published:11 November 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

A common challenge to the design of digital tabletops for public settings is how to effectively invite and guide passersby--who often have no prior experience with such technology--to interact using unfamiliar interaction methods and interfaces. We characterize such enticement from the system interface as the system's discoverability. A particular challenge to modern surface interfaces is the discoverability of system functionality: does the system require gestures? are there system menus? if so, how are they invoked? This research focuses on the discoverability of system menus on digital tabletops designed for public settings. An observational study of menu invocation methods in a museum setting is reported. Study findings suggest that discernible and recognizable interface elements, such as buttons, supported by the use of animation, can effectively attract and guide the discovery of menus. Design recommendations for improving menu discoverability are also presented.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

its0194-file3.wmv

wmv

29 MB

References

  1. Agamanolis, S. (2002). Designing displays for Human Connectedness. CSCW 2002: Workshop on Public, Community and Situated Displays.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bailly, G., Lecolinet, E., Nigay, L. (2008). Flower menus: a new type of marking menu with large menu breadth, within groups and efficient expert mode memorization. Proc. of AVI 2008, 15--22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Benko, H., Wilson, A.D., Baudisch, P. (2006). Precise selection techniques for multi-touch screens. Proc. of CHI 2006, 1263--1272. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bodenhausen, G.V. and Hugenberg, K. (2009). Atten-tion, perception, and social cognition. In F. Strack and J. Förster (eds.), Social cognition: The basis of human in-teraction. Psychology Press: Philadelphia, 1--22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Brandl, P., Forlines, C., Wigdor, D., Haller, M., Shen, C. (2008). Combining and measuring the benefits of bi-manual pen and direct-touch interaction on horizontal interfaces. Proc. of AVI 2008, 154--161. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Brandl, P., Leitner, J., Seifried, T., Haller, M., Doray, B., To, P. (2009). Occlusion-aware menu design for digital tabletops. Extended Abstracts of CHI 2009, 3223--3228. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Brignull, H. and Rogers, Y. (2003). Enticing People to Interact with Large Public Displays in Public Spaces. Proc. of INTERACT 2003, 17--22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Callahan, J., Hopkins, D., Weiser, M., Shneiderman, B. (1988). An empirical comparison of pie vs. linear men-us. Proc. of CHI 1988, 95--100. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Cao, X., Massimi, M., Balakrishnan, R. (2008). Flash-light jigsaw: an exploratory study of an ad-hoc multi-player game on public displays. Proc. of CSCW 2008, 77--86. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Correia, N., Mota, T., Rui Nobrega, Silva, L., Almeida, A. (2010). A multi-touch tabletop for robust multimedia interaction in museums. Proc. of ITS 2010, 117--120. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Gaver, W.W., Beaver, J., Benford, S. (2003). Ambiguity as a resource for design. Proc. of CHI 2003, 233--240. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Hesselmann, T., Stefan Floering, Schmitt, M. (2009). Stacked Half-Pie menus: navigating nested menus on interactive tabletops. Proc. of ITS 2009, 173--180. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Hinrichs, U. and Carpendale, S. (2011). Gestures in the wild: studying multi-touch gesture sequences on interactive tabletop exhibits. Proc. of CHI 2011, 3023--3032. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Hornecker, E. (2008). "I don't understand it either but it is cool": Visitor interactions with a multi-touch table in a museum. Proc. of Tabletop/ITS 2008, 121--128.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Jacucci, G., Morrison, A., Richard, G.T., Kleimola, J., Peltonen, P., Parisi, L., Laitinen, T. (2010). Worlds of information: designing for engagement at a public multi-touch display. Proc. of CHI 2010, 2267--2276. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Leithinger, D. and Haller, M. (2007). Improving Menu Interaction for Cluttered Tabletop Setups with User-Drawn Path Menus. Proc. of Tabletop 2007, 121--128.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Lepinski, G.J., Grossman, T., Fitzmaurice, G. (2010). The design and evaluation of multitouch marking menus. Proc. of CHI 2010, 2233--2242. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Marshall, P., Morris, R., Rogers, Y., Kreitmayer, S., Davies, M. (2011). Rethinking 'multi-user': an in-the-wild study of how groups approach a walk-up-and-use tabletop interface. Proc of CHI 2011, 3033--3042. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Morris, M.R., Paepcke, A., Winograd, T., Stamberger, J. (2006). TeamTag: Exploring Centralized versus Replicated Controls for Co-located Tabletop Groupware. Proc. of CHI 2006, 1273--128. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Mueller, J., Alt, F., Michelis, D., Schmidt, A. (2010). Requirements and design space for interactive public displays. Proc. of Multimedia 2010, 1285--1294. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Müller, J., Walter, R., Bailly, G., Nischt, M., Alt, F. (2012). Looking glass: a field study on noticing interac-tivity of a shop window. Proc of CHI 2012, 297--306. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Norman, D.A. (2010). Natural user interfaces are not natural. interactions, 17(3), 6--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Palmer, S. (1999). Vision Science: Photons to Phenomenology, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Peltonen, P., Kurvinen, E., Salovaara, A., Jacucci, G., Ilmonen, T., Evans, J., Oulasvirta, A., Saarikko, P. (2008). It's Mine, Don't Touch!: interactions at a large multi-touch display in a city centre. Proc. of CHI 2008, 1285--1294. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Shen, C., Lesh, N., Frederic, V. (2003). Personal digital historian: story sharing around the table. interactions, 10(2), 15--22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Wigdor, D., Williams, S., Cronin, M., Levy, R., White, K., Mazeev, M., Benko, H. (2009). Ripples: utilizing per-contact visualizations to improve user interaction with touch displays. Proc. of UIST 2009, 3--12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Wigdor, D. and Wixon, D. (2011). Brave NUI World: Designing Natural User Interfaces for Touch and Gesture: Morgan Kaufman. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Investigating menu discoverability on a digital tabletop in a public setting

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        ITS '12: Proceedings of the 2012 ACM international conference on Interactive tabletops and surfaces
        November 2012
        430 pages
        ISBN:9781450312097
        DOI:10.1145/2396636

        Copyright © 2012 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 11 November 2012

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        ITS '12 Paper Acceptance Rate24of63submissions,38%Overall Acceptance Rate119of418submissions,28%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader