Kerstin Bischoff
ABSTRACT
Music plays an important role in our everyday lives. Not surprisingly, shared musical taste is said to lead to social attraction. In this paper, we study in detail friendship links on the social music platform Last.fm, asking for similarities in taste as well as on demographic attributes and local network structure. On Last.fm, users connect to 'online' friends as usual, but also indicate strong 'real-life' friends by co-attending the same events. Thus, we can contrast these online ties with offline links of different strength. Complementing the analysis, we learn to predict both kinds of ties automatically, including public interaction data as additional relevant features. Our results emphasize the predictive power of the simple measure of mutual friends, while the indicative value of similarity on taste (though increasing with tie strength) is negligible.
- Adamic, L. A., and Adar, E. Friends and neighbors on the web. Social Networks 25, 3 (2003), 211--230.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Adamic, L. A., Buyukkokten, O., and Adar, E. A social network caught in the web. First Monday 8, 6 (2003).Google ScholarCross Ref
- Au Yeung, C.-m., and Iwata, T. Strength of social influence in trust networks in product review sites. In Proc. WSDM (2011), 495--504. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Backstrom, L., and Leskovec, J. Supervised random walks: predicting and recommending links in social networks. In Proc. WSDM (2011), 635--644. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bayma, N. K., and Ledbetter, A. Tunes that bind? predicting friendship strength in a music-based social network. Information, Communication & Society 12, 3 (2009), 408--427.Google Scholar
- Boer, D., Fischer, R., Strack, M., Bond, M. H., Lo, E., and Lam, J. How shared preferences in music create bonds between people: Values as the missing link. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 37, 9 (2011), 1159--1171.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Burt, R. S. Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology 110, 2 (2004), 349--399.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Crandall, D., Cosley, D., Huttenlocher, D., Kleinberg, J., and Suri, S. Feedback effects between similarity and social influence in online communities. In Proc. KDD (2008), 160--168. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Friedkin, N. E. A test of structural features of granovetter's strength of weak ties theory. Social Networks 2, 4 (1980), 411--422.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gardikiotis, A., and Baltzis, A. 'rock music for myself and justice to the world!': Musical identity, values, and music preferences. Psychology of Music 40, 2 (2012), 143--163.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gilbert, E., and Karahalios, K. Predicting tie strength with social media. In Proc. CHI (2009), 211--220. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Golder, S. A., and Yardi, S. Structural predictors of tie formation in twitter: Transitivity and mutuality. In Proc. SocialCom (2010). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Granovetter, M. The strength of weak ties: a network theory revisited. Sociological Theory 1 (1983), 201--233.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Groh, G., and Ehmig, C. Recommendations in taste related domains: collaborative filtering vs. social filtering. In Proc. GROUP (2007). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hall, M., Frank, E., Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B., Reutemann, P., and Witten, I. H. The weka data mining software: An update. SIGKDD Explorations 11, 1 (2009), 10--18. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hopcroft, J. E., Lou, T., and Tang, J. Who will follow you back?: reciprocal relationship prediction. In Proc. CIKM (2011), 1137--1146. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kahanda, I., and Neville, J. Using transactional information to predict link strength in online social networks. In Proc. ICWSM (2009).Google ScholarCross Ref
- La Fond, T., and Neville, J. Randomization tests for distinguishing social influence and homophily effects. In Proc. WWW (2010). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lee, D. H., and Brusilovsky, P. Social networks and interest similarity: the case of citeulike. In Proc. Hypertext (2010), 151--156. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Leskovec, J., and Horvitz, E. Planetary-scale views on a large instant-messaging network. In Proc. WWW (2008), 915--924. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Liben-Nowell, D., and Kleinberg, J. The link prediction problem for social networks. In Proc. CIKM (2003), 556--559. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Liu, H. Social network profiles as taste performances. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13, 1 (2007), 252--275.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marsden, P. V., and Campbell, K. E. Measuring tie strength. Social Forces 63, 2 (1984), 482--501.Google ScholarCross Ref
- McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., and Cook, J. M. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology 27 (2001), 415--444.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Meeder, B., Karrer, B., Sayedi, A., Ravi, R., Borgs, C., and Chayes, J. We know who you followed last summer: inferring social link creation times in twitter. In Proc. WWW (2011), 517--526. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mislove, A., Marcon, M., Gummadi, P. K., Druschel, P., and Bhattacharjee, B. Measurement and analysis of online social networks. In Proc. Internet Measurement Comference (2007), 29--42. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mislove, A., Viswanath, B., and K. P. Gummadi, P. D. You are who you know: Inferring user profiles in online social networks. In Proc. WSDM (2010), 251--260. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rentfrow, P. J., and Gosling, S. D. The do re mis of everyday life: The structure and personality correlates of music preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 84, 6 (2003), 1236--1256.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Schifanella, R., Barrat, A., Cattuto, C., Markines, B., and Menczer, F. Folks in folksonomies: Social link prediction from shared metadata. In Proc. WSDM (2010), 271--280. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Shi, X., Adamic, L. A., and Strauss, M. J. Networks of strong ties. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 378, 1 (2007), 33--47.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sinnott, R. Virtues of the haversine. Sky and Telescope 68, 2 (1984), 159.Google Scholar
- Thelwall, M. Homophily in myspace. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 60, 2 (2009), 219--231. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Verbrugge, L. M. The structure of adult friendship choices. Social Forces 56, 2 (1977), 576--597.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wu, A., DiMicco, J. M., and Millen, D. R. Detecting professional versus personal closeness using an enterprise social network site. In Proc. CHI (2010), 1955--1964. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Xiang, R., Neville, J., and Rogati, M. Modeling relationship strength in online social networks. In Proc. WWW (2010), 981--990. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yang, S.-H., Long, B., Smola, A., Sadagopan, N., Zheng, Z., and Zha, H. Like like alike: joint friendship and interest propagation in social networks. In Proc. WWW (2011), 537--546. Google ScholarDigital Library
Recommendations
Analyzing Close Friend Interactions in Social Media
SOCIALCOM '13: Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Social ComputingSocial media has increasingly become an outlet for expression in society. Users of online social networks often associate with many other users who are all treated as "friends, " even if they do not have a strong connection, or what would be described ...
Predicting tie strength with social media
CHI '09: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsSocial media treats all users the same: trusted friend or total stranger, with little or nothing in between. In reality, relationships fall everywhere along this spectrum, a topic social science has investigated for decades under the theme of tie ...
Predicting tie strength in a new medium
CSCW '12: Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative WorkWe have friends we consider very close and acquaintances we barely know. The social sciences use the term tie strength to denote this differential closeness with the people in our lives. In this paper, we explore how well a tie strength model developed ...
Comments