skip to main content
10.1145/2370216.2370426acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesubicompConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Towards reliable spatial information in LBSNs

Published:05 September 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

The proliferation of Location-based Social Networks (LBSNs) has been rapid during the last year due to the number of novel services they can support. The main interaction between users in an LBSN is location sharing, which builds the spatial component of the system. The majority of the LBSNs make use of the notion of check-in, to enable users to volunteeringly share their whereabouts with their peers and the system. The flow of this spatial information is unidirectional and originates from the users' side. Given that currently there is no infrastructure in place for detecting fake checkins, the quality of the spatial information plane of an LBSN is solely based on the honesty of the users. In this paper, we seek to raise the awareness of the community for this problem, by identifying and discussing the effects of the presence of fake location information. We further present a preliminary design of a fake check-in detection scheme, based on location-proofs. Our initial simulation results show that if we do not consider the infrastructural constraints, location-proofs can form a viable technical solution.

References

  1. Foursquare's cheater code: http://blog.foursquare.com/2010/04/07/503822143/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Foursquare's recommendation engine: http://engineering.foursquare.com/2011/08/03/foursquares-data-and-the-explore-recommendation-engine/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Foursquare's redesign: http://techcrunch.com/2012/06/03/foursquare-redesign-coming/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Foursquare's special offers: https://foursquare.com/business/merchants/specials.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. J. Byers, M. Mitzenmacher, and G. Zervas. Daily deals: prediction, social diffusion, and reputational ramifications. In WSDM, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. D. E. Denning and P. F. Macdoran. Location-Based Authentication: Grounding Cyberspace for Better Security. Computer Fraud and Security, (February):12--16, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. M. Ester, X. Xu, H.-P. Kriegel, and J. Sander. Density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise, pages 226--231. AAAI, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. W. He, X. Liu, and M. Ren. Location cheating: A security challenge to location-based social network services. In IEEE ICDCS, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. M. Kjaergaard, M. Wirz, D. Roggen, and G. Troster. Mobile sensing of pedestrian flocks in indoor environments using wifi signals. In Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom), 2012 IEEE International Conference on, pages 95--102, march 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. D. Lian and X. Xie. Learning location naming from user check-in histories. In ACM SIGSPATIAL GIS, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. J. Lindqvist, J. Cranshaw, J. Wiese, J. Hong, and J. Zimmerman. I'm the mayor of my house: Examining why people use foursquare - a social-driven location sharing application. In ACM CHI, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. A. Noulas, S. Scellato, R. Lambiotte, M. Pontil, and C. Mascolo. A tale of many cities: universal patters in human urban mobility. In PLoS ONE 7(5): e37027. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0037027, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. K. Pelechrinis, V. Zadorozhny, and V. Oleshchuk. Collaborative assessment of information provider's reliability and expertise using subjective logic. In CollaborateCom, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. S. Saroiu and A. Wolman. Enabling new mobile applications with location proofs. Proceedings of the 10th workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications - HotMobile '09, pages 1--6, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. S. Seidel and T. Rappaport. 914 mhz path loss prediction models for indoor wireless communications in multifloored buildings. Antennas and Propagation, IEEE Transactions on, 40(2):207--217, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. J. Zhang, M. A. Ackerman, and L. Adamic. Expertise networks in online communities: Structure and algorithms. In WWW, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Y. Zhang, Z. Li, and W. Trappe. Power-modulated challenge-response schemes for verifying location claims. IEEE GLOBECOM, pages 39--43, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Y. Zheng and X. Zhou. Computing with Spatial Trajectories. Springer-Verlag New York, LLC, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Towards reliable spatial information in LBSNs

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          UbiComp '12: Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing
          September 2012
          1268 pages
          ISBN:9781450312240
          DOI:10.1145/2370216

          Copyright © 2012 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 5 September 2012

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          UbiComp '12 Paper Acceptance Rate58of301submissions,19%Overall Acceptance Rate764of2,912submissions,26%

          Upcoming Conference

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader