ABSTRACT
In this paper we discuss participatory approaches to designing interactive technologies for children with disabilities. While participatory design (PD) has been increasingly influential in the field of Human-Computer Interaction as a whole, applying its methods and theories to children with disabilities raises challenges specific to this target group and poses more fundamental questions about the limits of PD. We will first build the underlying argument of why we believe PD is particularly important when designing for children with disabilities, before discussing the challenges and opportunities that come with implementing PD in this context. We ground this discussion in our own experiences with developing a learning environment for children with autism spectrum conditions (ASC). We then consider future perspectives and develop research questions by reflecting on our experiences.
- S. R. Arnstein. A Ladder Of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4):216--224, 1969.Google ScholarCross Ref
- L. Benton, H. Johnson, M. Brosnan, E. Ashwin, and B. Grawemeyer. IDEAS: an interface design experience for the autistic spectrum. In Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, CHI EA '11, pages 1759--1764, New York, NY, USA, 2011. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. Dindler and O. S. Iversen. Fictional Inquiry - design collaboration in a shared narrative space. CoDesign, 3(4):213--234, December 2007.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Druin. Cooperative Inquiry: Developing New Technologies for Children With Children. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: the CHI is the limit, pages 592--599. ACM Press New York, NY, USA, 1999. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Druin. The Role of Children in the Design of New Technology. Behaviour and Information Technology, 21(1):1--25, 2002.Google ScholarCross Ref
- P. Ehn. Work-oriented design of computer artifacts. Arbetslivscentrum, Stockholm, Sweden, 2nd edition, 1989. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. Frauenberger, J. Good, A. Alcorn, and H. Pain. Supporting the Design Contributions of Children With Autism Spectrum Conditions. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, IDC'12, New York, 2012. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. Frauenberger, J. Good, and W. E. Keay-Bright. Phenomenology, a framework for Participatory Design. In Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference, pages 187--190, New York, NY, USA, November 2010. ACM Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. Frauenberger, J. Good, and W. E. Keay-Bright. Designing Technology for Children with Special Needs - Bridging Perspectives through Participatory Design. CoDesign: International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts, 7(1):1--28, March 2011.Google Scholar
- C. Frauenberger, J. Good, W. E. Keay-Bright, and H. Pain. Interpreting Input from Children: a Designerly Approach. In S. Bødker and D. Olsen, editors, CHI '12: Proceedings of the 2012 annual conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM New York, NY, USA, May 4--10 2012. Google ScholarDigital Library
- O. Golan, E. Ashwin, Y. Granader, S. McClintock, K. Day, V. Leggett, and S. Baron-Cohen. Enhancing emotion recognition in children with autism spectrum conditions: an intervention using animated vehicles with real emotional faces. Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 40(3):269--279, 2010.Google Scholar
- M. L. Guha, A. Druin, and J. A. Fails. Designing With and for Children With Special Needs: an Inclusionary Model. In IDC '08: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Interaction design and children, pages 61--64, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Harrison, D. Tatar, and P. Sengers. The Three Paradigms of HCI. In Proceedings of alt.chi. ACM SIGCHI, 2007.Google Scholar
- G. R. Hayes. The relationship of action research to human-computer interaction. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., 18:15:1--15:20, August 2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. H. Hirano, M. T. Yeganyan, G. Marcu, D. H. Nguyen, L. A. Boyd, and G. R. Hayes. vSked: evaluation of a system to support classroom activities for children with autism. In Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Human factors in computing systems, CHI '10, pages 1633--1642, New York, NY, USA, 2010. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Hourcade, N. Bullock-Rest, and T. Hansen. Multi-touch tablet applications and activities to enhance the social skills of children with autism spectrum disorders. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, pages 1--12, 2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- W. E. Keay-Bright. Designing Playful Sensory Experiences With Interactive Whiteboard Technology: the Implications for Children on the Autistic Spectrum. In Proceedings of the 7th Design Conference. The European Academy of Design, 2007.Google Scholar
- J. Mankoff, G. R. Hayes, and D. Kasnitz. Disability studies as a source of critical inquiry for the field of assistive technology. In Proceedings of the 12th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility, ASSETS '10, pages 3--10, New York, NY, USA, 2010. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- L. Millen, S. Cobb, and H. Patel. A method for involving children with autism in design. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, IDC '11, pages 185--188, New York, NY, USA, 2011. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. J. Muller. The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook, chapter Participatory Design: The third Space in HCI, pages 1051--1068. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London, UK, 2003. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Oliver. The politics of disablement. Palgrave Macmillan, 1990.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Oliver. Chapter3: Defining Impairment and Disability: Issues at Stake. In C. Barnes and G. Mercer, editors, Exploring the Divide, chapter 3, pages 29--54. The Disability Press., Leeds, 1996.Google Scholar
- K. Porayska-Pomsta, C. Frauenberger, H. Pain, G. Rajendran, T. Smith, R. Menzies, M. Foster, A. Alcorn, S. Wass, S. Bernadini, K. Avramides, W. Keay-Bright, J. Chen, A. Waller, K. Guldberg, J. Good, and O. Lemon. Developing technology for autism: an interdisciplinary approach. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 16(2):117--127, 2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- H. Rittel and M. Webber. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy sciences, 4(2):155--169, 1973.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Seale. Digital Inclusion. A Research Briefing by the Technology Enhanced Learning Phase of the Teaching and Learning Research Programme, University of Southampton, 2009. http://tel.ioe.ac.uk/inclusion/digital-inclusion-research-briefing/.Google Scholar
- H. van Rijn, F. Sleeswijk Visser, and P. Stappers. Connecting through interacting: Toys that help designers learn from children with autism by playing with them. In International Association of Societies of Design Research 2009: Rigor and Relevance in Design, Seoul, South Korea, 18--22 October 2009.Google Scholar
- J. Zimmerman, E. Stolterman, and J. Forlizzi. An analysis and critique of Research through Design: towards a formalization of a research approach. In DIS '10: Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, pages 310--319, New York, NY, USA, 2010. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Challenges, opportunities and future perspectives in including children with disabilities in the design of interactive technology
Recommendations
Designing Smart Objects with Autistic Children: Four Design Exposès
CHI '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsThis paper describes the design work being conducted as part of the OutsideTheBox project. Within the time-frame of eight months, we engaged four children with autism in a participatory design process to develop their own smart object. We re-interpreted ...
Interactive technologies for children with special needs
IDC '12: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Interaction Design and ChildrenThere is a growing trend in both the academic and private sectors of designing innovative interactive technologies for children. These technologies could be a unique platform for addressing the freedoms and rights of children with special needs. They ...
Widening participation in technology design
This article presents a review of the design methods and techniques that have been used to involve children with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) in the technology design process. Situating the work within the established child-...
Comments