Robert Klepper
- 1 Alvrecht, A.J. and Galney, J.F. Software function source lines of code, and development effort prediction: A software science dictations, IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. (SE-9), (Nov, 1983), 693-698.Google Scholar
- 2 Banker, R.D. Batep, S.M., and Kemener, C.F. A model to evaluate variables importing the productivity of software maintenance projects. Mgt. Sci. 17, 1, (Jan. 1983). 1-18. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 3 Banker, R.D. and Kemener C.F. Economics of scale in new software development , IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. SE-15, 10 (Oct. 1989), 1199-1205. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 4 Belsley, D.A. Kulu, E. and Welsch, R.E. Regression Diagnostic Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collectivity. Wiley, New York 1980.Google Scholar
- 5 Boehm. B.W. Improving software productivity. IEEE Com. int, 2, 9 (Sept. 1987), 43-57. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 6 Boehm, B.W. Software Engineering Economics, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. 1981. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 7 Brooks, Jr. F.P. No silver bullet: Essence and accidents of software engineering IEEE Comput., 20, 5. (Apr. 1987), 10- 19. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 8 Card, D., McCary, F., and Page F. Evaluating software engeering productivity. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. SE-13, 7. (July 1987), 834-851. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 9 Chrysler, E. Some basic determinatnants of computer programming productivity. Commun. ACM 21, 6 (June 10978), 472- 483. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 10 Cohen, J. and Cohen, P. Applied Multiple Programming Condition Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Wiley, New York, 1975.Google Scholar
- 11 Gaybe. J.B. Multiple regression techniques for estimating computer programming cons. J. Syst. Manager., 12, 3 (Feb. 1974), 13-18.Google Scholar
- 12 Goldfiled, S. and Quandi, R. Some tests for heterosedausucity, J. Amber, Statistical Assoc. 60, 1965, 539-547.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 13 Harel E.C. and Mclean, E.R. The effects of using a nonprocedural computer language on programmer productivity, MIS, Q, 9, 2(June 1983), 109-120.Google ScholarDigital Library
- 14 Jeffrey, D.R. Software engineering productivity models for management information systems development. In R.J. Beland Jr. and R.A. Brinscheim, Eds., Critical Issues in Information System Research Wiley, 1987, Chap, 5. 113-134. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 15 Jeffrey, O.R. and Lawrence, M.J. Some issues in the measurement and control of programming productivity. Infro & Mgt. 4, 1981, 169-176.Google Scholar
- 16 Jeffrey, D.R. A software development productivity model fo MIs environemnts. J. Syst and Softw. 7, 1987, 115-125. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 17 Jeffrey, D.R. and Lawrence, M.J. Managing programming productivity, J. Sys. and Softw. 5, 1985. 19-58. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 18 Jones, C. Programming Productivity, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1986. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 19 Remeter, C.F. An empirical valuation of sotware cos estimation models. Commun. ACM 30, 5 (May 1987), 416-429. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 20 Martin, J. Fourth Generation Langauges: Volume 1, Principles Prentive-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, Nf. 1985. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 21 Mista, S.K. and Jastics, P.J. Third-genration versus fourthgenration software development, IEEE Softw. 5, 4 (July, 1958), 8-14. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 22 Nelson, E.A. Management Handbbok for the Estimation of Computer Programming costs. System Dvelopment Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, March, 1967.Google Scholar
- 23 Neter, J. Wasserman, W. and Rotner, M.H. Applied Linear Statistical Models, dl e. Bomewood, H. Richard D. Irwin, 1985.Google Scholar
- 24 Rudolph, E.E., Productivity in Computer Application Development. Department of Management Studies. The University fo Aucklan, Auckland, New Zealand, and Burroughs Logic and Information Network Compiler Report. 1984.Google Scholar
- 25 Watson, C.E. and Felix, C.P. A method of programming management and estimation, IBM Syst. J. 16, 1 (Jan-Mar, 1977), 54-75.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Third and fourth generation language productivity differences
Recommendations
A macro analysis of productivity differences across fields: Challenges in the measurement of scientific publishing
While many studies have compared research productivity across scientific fields, they have mostly focused on the "hard sciences," in many cases due to limited publication data for the "softer" disciplines; these studies have also typically been based on ...
Cross-country differences in publishing productivity of academics in research universities
The main bibliometric databases indicate large differences in country-level scientific publishing productivity, with high growth in many East Asian countries. However, it is difficult to translate country-level publishing productivity to individual-...
Differences Between Third and Fourth Generation Programmers: A Human Factor Analysis
The use of nonprocedural fourth generation languages created a revolution in the manner in which computer-based information systems are being constructed. These languages are being used extensively by end-users and by programmers in end-user ...
Comments