Jakob Tholander
ABSTRACT
We draw on the concept of agency in order to understand the process of how design materials 'talk back' to designers. In so doing, we illustrate the various levels at which agency can emerge in the context of intensive short-time prototyping sessions. In HCI, it is often assumed that the designer is the agent that acts intentionally in the design process. Contrary to this, recent notions of agency provide a way of analysing the performative role of design materials as intra-actions between components within a given phenomenon, rather than as meanings merely ascribed by actions of designers. The notion of agency puts focus on the emerging properties of materials and how they actively contribute to the way that design activity unfolds. The analyses showed how interaction design is to a large extent driven by emergent characteristics of available materials. The results have implications for understanding material interactions and materiality in interaction design.
- Barad, K. Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter In: Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society. 28(3). (2003).Google Scholar
- Bardzell, J & Bardzell, S. Interaction criticism: a proposal and framework for a new discipline of HCI. Proc. CHI 2008. ACM Press. (2008). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Binder, T., De Michelis, G., T., Ehn, P., Jacucci, G., Linde, P., Wagner, I. Design Things. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press. (2011).Google Scholar
- Coyne, R. D., & Snodgrass, A. D. (1991). Is designing mysterious? Challenging the dual knowledge thesis. Design Studies, 12(12, 3), 124--131.Google Scholar
- Dourish. P. Where the action is. Foundations of Embodied Interaction. MIT Press. 2001. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dourish, P. Seeing Like an Interface, Proc OzCHI. ACM Press. (2007). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fallman., D. Design-oriented human-computer interaction. Proc. CHI '03. ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, (2003). 225--232. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gibson, J. The Theory of Affordances. In Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing, Eds. Shaw, R., and Bransford, J. (1977).Google Scholar
- Hayles, K. How We Became Posthuman:Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature and Informatics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (1999). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hutchins. E. Cognition in the Wild. MIT Press. (1995).Google Scholar
- Iacucci, G., Wagner, I. Supporting Collaboration Ubiquitously: An augmented learning environment for architecture students. Proc ECSCW'03. Kluwer Academic Publishers, (2003). pp. 139--158 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jacucci, G., Wagner, I., Performative Roles of Materiality for Collective Creativity. Proc Creativity and Cognition 2007, (2007), ACM Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Laaksolaahti., J. (in preparation). Broken but polished. Unpublished Manuscript.Google Scholar
- Latour B. On Interobjectivity. In Mind, Culture and Activity, Vol 3 (4) (1996). 228--245.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lave, J. Cognition in Practice. (1988). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Löwgren, J. and Stolterman, E. Thoughtful Interaction Design: A Design Perspective on Information Technology. The MIT Press. (2004). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jordan B., Henderson A.. Interaction Analysis: Foundation and Practices. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4 (1). (1995). 39--103.Google Scholar
- Martin, D, O'Neill, J and Randall, D. Talking about (my) Generation': Creativity, Practice, Technology & Talk. Proc ECSCW. (2009). pp. 171--190.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Murphy, K. M.. Collaborative imagining: The interactive use of gestures, talk, and graphic representation in architectural practice. Semiotica, 156(1/4), (2005) 113145.Google Scholar
- Norman, D. The Design of Everyday Things, Doubleday Business Press. (1990).Google Scholar
- Pickering, A. The mangle of practice. University Of Chicago Press, (1995).Google Scholar
- Robles, E. & M. Wiberg. Texturing the 'Material Turn' in Interaction Design, Proc TEI 2010. ACM Press. (2010). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rosner, D. and Taylor, A. S. Antiquarian answers: book restoration as a resource for design. Proc CHI '11. ACM Press, (2011). 2665--2668. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Schon, D. The Reflective Practitioner. How Professionals Think In Action. Basic Books. (1983)Google Scholar
- Suchman, L. Plans and Situated Actions: the problem of human-machine communication. New York: Cambridge University Press. (1987). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Suchman, L.. Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions. (2006). Cambridge University Press Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sundstrom, P & Hook, K. Hand in hand with the material: designing for suppleness, Proc CHI 2010, ACM Press. (2010). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Taylor, A. S.. Machine intelligence. Proc CHI '09, ACM Press (2009). pp. 2109--2118. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tholander, J., Karlgren, K., Ramberg, R., and Sokjer, P. Where all the interaction is: sketching in interaction design as an embodied practice. Proc DIS '08. ACM Press, (2008), 445--454. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Vallgarda, A & Redstrom, J. Computational Composites. Proc CHI 2007. ACM Press. (2007). pp. 513- Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wiberg, M, and Robles, E.. Texturing the "material turn" in interaction design. Proc TEI 2010. ACM Press. (2010) Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wright, P & J. McCarthy. Experience-Centered Design., Morgan & Claypool Publishers. (2010).Google Scholar
- Wolf, V.T., Rode, J., Sussman, J., and Kellogg, W. Dispelling "design" as the black art of CHI. Proc CHI '06. ACM Press, (2006). 521--530. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J., and Evenson, S.. Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. Proc CHI '07. (2007). 493--50. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Understanding agency in interaction design materials
Recommendations
Understanding interaction design practices
CHI '11: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsThere is an undesirable gap between HCI research aimed at influencing interaction design practice and the practitioners in question. To close this gap, we advocate a theoretical and methodological focus on the day-to-day, lived experience of designers. ...
Foundations of Materials Experience: An Approach for HCI
CHI '15: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsA growing number of HCI scholars have started to take materiality as an entry point for acquiring a deeper understanding of the possibilities and constraints of design. Steadily moving beyond a distinction between the physical and the digital, a few ...
Materials, materiality, and media
CHI '13: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsIn HCI, and especially in interaction design, the material aspect of interactions is currently emphasized. Nevertheless, it is challenging to theoretically frame the variety of digital or immaterial, and physical materials. In order to contribute to ...
Comments