skip to main content
10.1145/2207676.2208412acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Modeling task performance for a crowd of users from interaction histories

Authors Info & Claims
Published:05 May 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present TOME, a novel framework that helps developers quantitatively evaluate user interfaces and design iterations by using histories from crowds of end users. TOME collects user-interaction histories via an interface instrumentation library as end users complete tasks; these histories are compiled using the Keystroke-Level Model (KLM) into task completion-time predictions using CogTool. With many histories, TOME can model prevailing strategies for tasks without needing an HCI specialist to describe users' interaction steps. An unimplemented design change can be evaluated by perturbing a TOME task model in CogTool to reflect the change, giving a new performance prediction. We found that predictions for quick (5-60s) query tasks in an instrumented brain-map interface averaged within 10% of measured expert times. Finally, we modified a TOME model to predict closely the speed-up yielded by a proposed interaction before implementing it.

References

  1. Callahan, S. P., Freire, J., Santos, E., Scheidegger, C. E., Silva, C. T., and Vo, H. T. Vistrails: visualization meets data management. In ACM SIGMOD (2006), 745--747. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Card, S. K., Moran, T. P., and Newell, A. The keystroke-level model for user performance time with interactive systems. Comm. of the ACM 23, 7 (1980), 396--410. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Heer, J., Mackinlay, J., Stolte, C., and Agrawala, M. Graphical histories for visualization: supporting analysis, communication, and evaluation. IEEE TVCG 14 (November 2008), 1189--1196. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Hilbert, D. M., and Redmiles, D. F. Extracting usability information from user interface events. ACM Comput. Surv. 32 (December 2000), 384--421. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Hudson, S. E., John, B. E., Knudsen, K., and Byrne, M. D. A tool for creating predictive performance models from user interface demonstrations. In ACM UIST (1999), 93--102. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Ivory, M. Y., and Hearst, M. A. The state of the art in automating usability evaluation of user interfaces. ACM Comput. Surv. 33 (December 2001), 470--516. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. John, B. E., Prevas, K., Salvucci, D. D., and Koedinger, K. Predictive human performance modeling made easy. In ACM CHI (2004), 455--462. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. John, B. E., and Suzuki, S. Toward cognitive modeling for predicting usability. In HCI International (2009), 267--276. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. MacKenzie, I. S., and Buxton, W. Extending Fitts' law to two-dimensional tasks. In ACM CHI (1992), 219--226. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Modeling task performance for a crowd of users from interaction histories

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '12: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2012
      3276 pages
      ISBN:9781450310154
      DOI:10.1145/2207676

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 5 May 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader