Maurice Ten Koppel
Gilles Bailly
Jörg Müller
Robert Walter
ABSTRACT
Most interactive public displays currently rely on flat screens. This form factor impacts how users (1) notice the public display (2) develop motivation and (3) (socially) interact with the public display. In this paper, we present Chained Displays, a combination of several screens to create different form factors for interactive public displays. We also present a design space based on two complementary concepts, Focus and Nimbus, to describe and compare chained display configurations. Finally, we performed a field study comparing three chained displays: Flat, Concave, and Hexagonal. Results show that Flat triggers the strongest honeypot effect, Hexagonal causes low social learning, and Concave triggers the smallest amount of simultaneously interacting users among other findings.
- Altman, I. 1975. The environment and social behavior: Privacy, personal space, territory, crowding. Monterey, Calif.: Brooks/Cole Pub. Co.Google Scholar
- Benford, S., Bullock, A., Cook, N., Harvey, P., Ingram, R., Lee, O. 1993. From Rooms to Cyberspace: Models of Interaction in Large Virtual Computer Spaces. Interacting with Computers. 217--237.Google Scholar
- Benko, H., Wilson, A. D., and Balakrishnan, R. 2008. Sphere: multi-touch interactions on a spherical display. ACM UIST '08, 77--86. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Beyer, G., Alt, F., Mueller, J., Schmidt, A., Haulsen, I., Klose, S., Isakovic, K., Schiewe, M.: Audience Behavior around Large Interactive Cylindrical Screens. ACM CHI'11, 1021--1030. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Boyle, M., Greenberg, S. 200 The Language of Privacy: Learning from Video Media Space Analysis and Design. ACM ToCHI, Vol. 12, No 2. P328--370. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Brignull, H. and Rogers, Y. 2003. Enticing people to interact with large public displays in public spaces. IFIP INTERACT 2003, p. 17--24.Google Scholar
- Cao, X., Massimi, M., & Balakrishnan, R. 2008. Flashlight jigsaw: an exploratory study of an ad-hoc multi-player game on public displays, ACM CSCW '08, 77--86 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Companje, R., van Dijk, N., Hogenbirk, H. and Mast, D. 2007. Globe4D, Time-Traveling with an Interactive Four- Dimensional Globe. ACM MULTIMEDIA'06, 959--960. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Coutrix, C., Kuikkaniemi, K., Kurvinen, E., Jacucci, G., Avdouevski, I., Mäkelä, R. 2011. FizzyVis: Designing for Playful Information Browsing on a Multitouch Public Display. ACM DPPI'11. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dalsgaard, P., & Hansen, L. K. 2008. Performing perception - staging aesthetics of interaction. ACM TOCHI, 15(3), 1--33. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dalton, S. N., Marshall, P., & Dalton, R. C. 2010. Measuring environments for public displays: A space syntax approach. ACM CHI EA'10, 3841--3846. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Elumen's Vision Dome. www.virtuale3d.com/elumens.htmlGoogle Scholar
- Finke, M., Tang, A., Leung, R., & Blackstock, M. 2008. Lessons learned: Game design for large public displays. DIMEA '08, 23--33. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fernado, O., Adach, K., Cohen, M. 2004. Phantom Sources for Separation of Listening and Viewing Positions of Multipresent Avatars in Narrowcasting Collaborative Virtual Environments. IDCSW'04. 170--175. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Greenberg, S., Marquardt, N., Ballendat, T., Diaz-Marino, R. and Wang, M. 2011. Proxemic Interactions: The New Ubicomp? Interactions 18, 1 (2011), 42--50. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hornecker, E., Marshall, P., & Rogers, Y. 2007. From entry to access: How shareability comes about. ACM DPPI'07, 328--342 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hua, H., Brown, L. D., Gao, C., and Ahuja, N. 2003. A New Collaborative Infrastructure: SCAPE. IEEE VR' 03, 171--179. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jacucci, G., Morrison, A., Richard, G., Kleimola, J., Peltonen, P., Parisi, L., & Laitinen, T. 2010. Worlds of information: Designing for engagement at a public multi-touch display. ACM CHI'10, 2267--2276. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kendon, A. 2010. Spacing and orientation in co-present interaction. Development of Multimodal Interfaces: Active Listening and Synchrony, 1--15. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kettner, S., Madden, C. and Ziegler, R. 2004. Direct Rotational Interaction with a Spherical Projection. Creat. & Cog. Symp. on Int.: Syst., Pract. and Theory.Google Scholar
- Marshall, P., Morris, R., Rogers, Y., Kreitmayer, S., & Davies, M. 2011. Rethinking multi-user: An in-the-wild study of how groups approach a walk-up-and-use tabletop interface. ACM CHI '11, 3033--3042. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marshall, P., Rogers, Y., & Pantidi, N. 2011. Using f-formations to analyse spatial patterns of interaction in physical environments. ACM CSCW '11, 445--454. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mataxas, G. Markopoulos, P. 2008. "Aware of What?" A Formal model of Awarness Systems that Extends the Focus-Nimbus. Enginnering Interactive Systems. 429--446. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Michelis, D., & Müller, J. 2011. The audience funnel: Observations of gesture based interaction with multiple large displays in a city center. In International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, (1), 1--1.Google Scholar
- Müller, J. Walter, R., Bailly, G., Nischt, M., Alt, F. 2012. Looking Glass: A Field Study on Noticing Interactivity of a Shop Window. ACM CHI'12. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Peltonen, P., Kurvinen, E., Salovaara, A., Jacucci, G., Ilmonen, T., Evans, J., Oulasvirta, A., Saarikko, P. 2008. It's mine, don't touch!: Interactions at a large multi-touch display in a city centre. ACM CHI'08, 1285--1294. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Perry, M., Beckett, S., O'Hara, K., & Subramanian, S. 2010. Wavewindow: Public, performative gestural interaction. ACM ITS '10, 109--112. Google ScholarDigital Library
- OSHA. United states Departement of Labor, section regulations, paragraph 1910.37(a) 3. www.dol.gov.Google Scholar
- Reeves, S., Benford, S., O'Malley, C., & Fraser, M. 2005. Designing the spectator experience. ACM CHI'05, 741--750. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rodden, T. 1996. Populating the Application: A Model of Awareness for Cooperative Applications. ACM CSCW'96. 87--96. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rogers, Y., & Lindley, S. 2004. Collaborating around large interactive displays: Which way is best to meet. Interacting with Computers, 16(6), 1133--1152.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Roudaut, A., Pohl, H., Baudisch, P. 2011. Touch input on curved surfaces. ACM CHI'11, 1011--1020. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Russell, D., Drews, C., & Sue, A. 2002. Social aspects of using large public interactive displays for collaboration. ACM Ubicomp'02, 663--670. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ryall, K., Forlines, C., Shen, C., & Morris, M. R. 2004. Exploring the effects of group size and table size on interactions with tabletop shared-display groupware. ACM CSCW '04, 284--293. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Scupelli, P. G., Kiesler, S., & Fussell, S. R. 2007. Using isovist views to study placement of large displays in natural settings. ACM CHI EA '07, 2645--2650. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Vogel, D. and Balakrishnan, R. Interactive public ambient displays: Transitioning from implicit to explicit, public to personal, interaction with multiple users. ACM UIST'04, 137--146. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Chained displays: configurations of public displays can be used to influence actor-, audience-, and passer-by behavior
Recommendations
Midair displays: exploring the concept of free-floating public displays
CHI EA '14: CHI '14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing SystemsDue to advances in technology, displays could replace literally any surface in the future, including walls, windows, and ceilings. At the same time, midair remains a relatively unexplored domain for the use of displays as of today, particularly in ...
Squaring the circle: how framing influences user behavior around a seamless cylindrical display
CHI '13: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsRecent research has presented large public displays in novel non-flat shapes such as spheres, curved planes and cylinders, and looked at the influence of the form factor on user behavior. Yet, the basic shape cannot be considered in isolation when ...
Cross-device interaction with large displays in public: insights from both users' and observers' perspectives
OzCHI '17: Proceedings of the 29th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction1Using a mixture of physical gestures and one's smartphone is a convenient way for people to engage and interact with large displays in public. Yet, one of the challenges of cross-device interactions is to design techniques that encourage participation. ...
Comments