Holger Danielsiek
ABSTRACT
We describe the first results of our work towards a concept inventory for Algorithms and Data Structures. Based on expert interviews and the analysis of 400 exams we were able to identify several core topics which are prone to error. In a pilot study, we verified misconceptions known from the literature and identified previously unknown misconceptions related to Algorithms and Data Structures. In addition to this, we report on methodological issues and point out the importance of a two-pronged approach to data collection.
- V. L. Almstrum, P. B. Henderson, V. J. Harvey, C. Heeren, W. A. Marion, C. Riedesel, L.-K. Soh, and A. E. Tew. Concept inventories in computer science for the topic discrete mathematics. SIGCSE Bulletin, 38(4):132--145, Dec. 2006. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- C. Chang, P. J. Denning, J. J. Cross II, G. Engel, R. Sloan, D. Carver, R. Eckhouse, W. King, F. Lau, S. Mengel, P. Srimani, E. Roberts, R. Shackelford, R. Austing, C. F. Cover, G. Davies, A. McGettrick, G. M. Schneider, and U. Wolz. Computing Curricula 2001: Computer Science. Journal on Educational Resources in Computing, 1, 2001. Article 1, 240 pp.Google Scholar
- T. H. Cormen, C. E. Leiserson, R. L. Rivest, and C. Stein. Introduction to Algorithms. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2nd ed., 2001. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Eckerdal, R. McCartney, J. E. Moström, M. Ratcliffe, and C. Zander. Can graduating students design software systems? In Proc. 37th SIGCSE Symp. Computer Science Education, pp. 403--407. 2006. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Eckerdal and M. Thuné. Novice Java programmers' conceptions of "object" and "class", and variation theory. In Proc. 10th ITiCSE Conf. Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, pp. 89--93. 2005. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Ginat. The baffling CS notions of "as-if" and "don't-care". In Proc. 41st SIGCSE Symp. Computer Science Education, pp. 385--389. 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- K. Goldman, P. Gross, C. Heeren, G. L. Herman, L. C. Kaczmarczyk, M. C. Loui, and C. Zilles. Identifying important and difficult concepts in introductory computing courses using a Delphi process. In Proc. 39th SIGCSE Symp. Computer Science Education, pp. 256--260. 2008. Google ScholarDigital Library
- G. L. Herman, M. C. Loui, and C. Zilles. Creating the digital logic concept inventory. In Proc. 41th SIGCSE Symp. Computer Science Education, pp. 102--106. 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Holland, R. Griffiths, and M. Woodmann. Avoiding object misconceptions. In Proc. 28th SIGCSE Symp. Computer Science Education, pp. 131--134. 1997. Google ScholarDigital Library
- L. C. Kaczmarczyk, E. R. Petrick, J. P. East, and G. L. Herman. Identifying student misconceptions of programming. In Proc. 41st SIGCSE Symp. Computer Science Education, pp. 107--111. 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. Loftus, L. Thomas, and C. Zander. Can graduating students design: revisited. In Proc. 42nd SIGCSE Symp. Computer Science Education, pp. 105--110. 2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. McCracken, V. Almstrum, D. Diaz, M. Guzdial, D. Hagan, Y. B.-D. Kolikant, C. Laxer, L. Thomas, I. Utting, and T. Wilusz. A multi-national, multi- institutional study of assessment of programming skills of first-year CS students. SIGCSE Bull., 33:125--180, 2001. Google ScholarDigital Library
- N. Ragonis and M. Ben-Ari. A long-term investigation of the comprehension of OOP concepts by novices. Computer Science Education, 15(3):203--221, Sept. 2005.Google ScholarCross Ref
- K. Sanders, J. Boustedt, A. Eckerdal, R. McCartney, J. E. Moström, L. Thomas, and C. Zander. Student understanding of object-oriented programming as expressed in concept maps. In Proc. 39th SIGCSE Symp. Computer Science Education, pp. 332--336. 2008. Google ScholarDigital Library
- O. Seppala, L. Malmi, and A. Korhonen. Observations on student misconceptions -- a case study of the build-heap algorithm. Computer Science Education, 16(3):241--255. 2006.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. E. Tew and M. Guzdial. Developing a validated assessment of fundamental CS1 concepts. In Proc. 41st SIGCSE Symp. Computer Science Education, pp. 97--101. 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Detecting and understanding students' misconceptions related to algorithms and data structures
Recommendations
Identifying student misconceptions of programming
SIGCSE '10: Proceedings of the 41st ACM technical symposium on Computer science educationComputing educators are often baffled by the misconceptions that their CS1 students hold. We need to understand these misconceptions more clearly in order to help students form correct conceptions. This paper describes one stage in the development of a ...
Students' misconceptions about the types of values data structures can store
Given the importance of data structures in undergraduate computer science education, we are interested in how students learn to apply data structures. In order to identify points of difficulty in applying data structures, we conducted an exploratory ...
Analyzing the strength of undergraduate misconceptions about software engineering
ICER '10: Proceedings of the Sixth international workshop on Computing education researchWhile many computer science students plan to pursue careers as software engineers, research shows that most traditional undergraduate CS programs fail to prepare students for the realities of programming in industry. Many misconceptions that are ...
Comments