skip to main content
10.1145/1957656.1957699acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Anthropomorphic design for an interactive urban robot: the right design approach

Published:06 March 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

The paper presents the first step of a user-centered design process for a robot designated to operate in urban public space. A participatory design workshop was conducted to challenge the anthropomorphic design approach assumed by the designers and elicit user requirements for the design. In contrast to the expectations, the results show a tendency towards a preference of a non-anthropomorphic design.

References

  1. A. Green, H. Huttenrauch, M. Norman, L. Oestreicher, and K. S. Eklundh. User centered design for intelligent service robots. In Proc of the IEEE ROMAN'00, Osaka. Japan, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. S. B. Kiesler and J. Goetz. Mental models of robotic assistants. In CHI Extended Abstracts, pages 576--577, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. R. Kim, S. S. Kwak, Y.-k. Lim, and M.-s. Kim. Focus group interview for designing a growing robot. In Proc of the 4th ACM/IEEE HRI'09, pages 305--306, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. M. Lee and J. Forlizzi. Designing adaptive robotic services. In Proc of IASDR09, New York, NY, 2009. ACM Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. D. Li, P.-L. P. Rau, and Y. Li. A cross-cultural study: Effect of robot appearance and task. I. J. Social Robotics, 2(2):175--186, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. M. Lohse, F. Hegel, A. Swadzba, K. Rohlfing, S. Wachsmuth, and B. Wrede. What can i do for you? appearance and application of robots. Workshop on The Reign of Catz and Dogz? The role of virtual creatures in a computerised society., pages 121--126, 02/04/2007 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. M. Lohse, F. Hegel, and B. Wrede. Domestic applications for social robots - a user study on appearance and function. Journal of Physical Agents, 2:21--32, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. J. Osada, S. Ohnaka, and M. Sato. The scenario and design process of childcare robot, papero. In Proc of the ACM SIGCHI ACE'06, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. A. Powers and S. B. Kiesler. The advisor robot: tracing people's mental model from a robot's physical attributes. In HRI, pages 218--225, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. S. Rosenbaum, G. Cockton, K. Coyne, M. Muller, and T. Rauch. Focus groups in hci: Wealth of information or waste of resources? In Proc of CHI 2002, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. A. Weiss, D. Wurhofer, M. Lankes, and M. Tscheligi. Autonomous vs. tele-operated: How people perceive human-robot collaboration with hrp-2. In Proc of the 4th ACM/IEEE HRI'09, pages 257--258, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Anthropomorphic design for an interactive urban robot: the right design approach

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader