skip to main content
10.1145/1943552.1943555acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmmsysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Energy-efficient mobile video management using smartphones

Authors Info & Claims
Published:23 February 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

Mobile devices are increasingly popular for the versatile capture and delivery of video content. However, the acquisition and transmission of large amounts of video data on mobile devices face fundamental challenges such as power and wireless bandwidth constraints. To support diverse mobile video applications, it is critical to overcome these challenges. We present a design framework that brings together several key ideas to enable energy-efficient mobile video management applications. First, we leverage off-the-shelf smartphones as mobile video sensors. Second, concurrently with video recordings we acquire geospatial sensor meta-data to describe the videos. Third, we immediately upload the meta-data to a server to enable low latency video search. This last step allows for very energy-efficient transmissions, as the sensor data sets are small and the bulky video data can be uploaded on demand, if and when needed. We present the design, a simulation study, and a preliminary prototype of the proposed system. Experimental results show that our approach substantially prolongs the battery life of mobile devices while only slightly increasing the search

latency

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

110223_26192_03_acm.mp4

mp4

205.6 MB

References

  1. I. Akyildiz, T. Melodia, and K. Chowdhury. A Survey on Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks. Computer Networks, 51, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. S. Arslan Ay, R. Zimmermann, and S. H. Kim. Viewable Scene Modeling for Geospatial Video Search. In 16th ACM Intl. Conference on Multimedia, pages 309--318, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. T. Brinkhoff. A Framework for Generating Network-Based Moving Objects. GeoInformatica, 6(2):153--180, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Y. Cheng, Y. Chawathe, A. LaMarca, and J. Krumm. Accuracy Characterization for Metropolitan-scale Wi-Fi Localization. In 3rd Intl. Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services, page 245, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. T. Cheung, K. Okamoto, F. Maker III, X. Liu, and V. Akella. Markov Decision Process (MDP) Framework for Optimizing Software on Mobile Phones. In 7rd ACM Intl. Conference on Embedded Software, pages 11--20, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. B. Epshtein, E. Ofek, Y. Wexler, and P. Zhang. Hierarchical Photo Organization Using Geo-Relevance. In 15th ACM Intl. Symposium on Advances in Geographic Information Systems (GIS), pages 1--7, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. W. Feng, E. Kaiser, W. Feng, and M. Baillif. Panoptes: Scalable Low-power Video Sensor Networking Technologies. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications (TOMCCAP), 1(2):151--167, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. I. Google. Android -- An Open Handset Alliance Project. http://developer.android.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. C. H. Graham, N. R. Bartlett, J. L. Brown, Y. Hsia, C. C. Mueller, and L. A. Riggs. Vision and Visual Perception. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1965.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. S. Kang, J. Lee, H. Jang, H. Lee, Y. Lee, S. Park, T. Park, and J. Song. SeeMon: Scalable and Energy-Efficient Context Monitoring Framework for Sensor-Rich Mobile Environments. In 6th Intl. Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services, pages 267--280, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. L. S. Kennedy and M. Naaman. Generating Diverse and Representative Image Search Results for Landmarks. In 17th Intl. Conference on the World Wide Web (WWW), pages 297--306, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. P. Kulkarni, D. Ganesan, P. Shenoy, and Q. Lu. SensEye: a Multi-tier Camera Sensor Network. In 13th ACM Intl. Conference on Multimedia, page 238, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. M. Naaman, Y. J. Song, A. Paepcke, and H. Garcia-Molina. Automatic Organization for Digital Photographs with Geographic Coordinates. In 4th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, pages 53--62, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. T. Pavlidis. Why Meaningful Automatic Tagging of Images is Very Hard. In IEEE ICME 2009, pages 1432--1435, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. A. Pigeau and M. Gelgon. Building and Tracking Hierarchical Geographical & Temporal Partitions for Image Collection Management on Mobile Devices. In 13th ACM Intl. Conference on Multimedia, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. M. Ra, J. Paek, A. Sharma, R. Govindan, M. Krieger, and M. Neely. Energy-delay Tradeoffs in Smartphone Applications. In 8th Intl. Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services, pages 255--270, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. K. Rodden and K. R. Wood. How do People Manage their Digital Photographs? In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (SIGCHI), pages 409--416, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. A. Shye, B. Sholbrock, and G. Memik. Into The Wild: Studying Real User Activity Patterns to Guide Power Optimization for Mobile Architectures. In Micro, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. B. Tiwana and L. Zhang. PowerTutor. http://powertutor.org, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. C. Torniai, S. Battle, and S. Cayzer. Sharing, Discovering and Browsing Geotagged Pictures on the Web. In A. Scharl and P. K. Tochtermann, editors, The Geospatial Web: How Geo-Browsers, Social Software and the Web 2.0 are Shaping the Network Society. Springer, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. K. Toyama, R. Logan, and A. Roseway. Geographic Location Tags on Digital Images. In 11th ACM Intl. Conference on Multimedia, pages 156--166, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. M. Viredaz, L. Brakmo, and W. Hamburgen. Energy Management on Handheld Devices. Queue, 1(7):52, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Y. Wang, J. Lin, M. Annavaram, Q. Jacobson, J. Hong, B. Krishnamachari, and N. Sadeh. A Framework of Energy Efficient Mobile Sensing for Automatic User State Recognition. In 7th Intl. Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services, pages 179--192, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Energy-efficient mobile video management using smartphones

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            MMSys '11: Proceedings of the second annual ACM conference on Multimedia systems
            February 2011
            294 pages
            ISBN:9781450305181
            DOI:10.1145/1943552

            Copyright © 2011 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 23 February 2011

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate176of530submissions,33%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader