skip to main content
research-article

Optimizing physical-layer parameters for wireless sensor networks

Published:04 February 2011Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

As wireless sensor networks utilize battery-operated nodes, energy efficiency is of paramount importance at all levels of system design. In order to save energy in the transfer of data from the sensor nodes to one or more sinks, the data may be routed through other nodes rather than transmitting it directly to the sink(s). In this article, we investigate the problem of energy-efficient transmission of data over a noisy channel, focusing on the setting of physical-layer parameters. We derive a metric called the energy per successfully received bit, which specifies the expected energy required to transmit a bit successfully over a particular distance given a channel noise model. By minimizing this metric, we can find, for different modulation schemes, the energy-optimal relay distance and the optimal transmit energy as a function of channel noise level and path loss exponent. These results enable network designers to select the hop distance, transmit power, and/or modulation scheme that maximize network lifetime.

References

  1. Akyildiz, I., Su, W., Sankarasubramaniam, Y., and Cayirci, E. 2002. A survey on sensor networks. IEEE Comm. Mag. 40, 8, 102--114. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Ammer, J. and Rabaey, J. 2006. The energy-per-useful-bit metric for evaluating and optimizing sensor network physical layers. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Wireless Ad-Hoc and Sensor Networks. 695--700.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen, J. 2004. Carrier recovery in burst-mode 16-qam. MS Thesis, University of Saskatchewan.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen, P., O'Dea, B., and Callaway, E. 2002. Energy efficient system design with optimum transmission range for wireless ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications. 945--952.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen, Y., Sirer, E., and Wicker, S. 2003. On selection of optimal transmission power for ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of the 36th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-36). 10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Cheung, H. Y., Cheuizg, K. S., and Laun, J. 2001. A low power monolithic agc with automatic dc offset cancellation for direct conversion hybrid cdma transceiver used in telemetering. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems. 4, 390--393.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Chien, C., Srivastava, M. B., Jain, R., Lettieri, P., Aggarwal, V., and Sternowski, R. 1999. Adaptive radio for multimedia wireless links. IEEE J. Select. Areas Comm. 17, 5, 793--813. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Ci, S., Sharif, H., and Nuli, K. 2005. Study of an adaptive frame size predictor to enhance energy conservation in wireless sensor networks. IEEE J. Select. Areas Comm. 23, 2, 283--292. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Cui, S., Goldsmith, A. J., and Bahai, A. 2005. Energy-Contrained modulation optimization. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Comm. 4, 8, 2349--2360. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Deng, J., Han, Y. S., Chen, P. N., and Varshney, P. K. 2004. Optimum transmission range for wireless ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference. 1024--1029.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Heinzelman, W., Chandrakasan, A., and Balakrishnan, H. 2002. An application specific protocol architecture for wireless microsensor networks. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Comm. 1, 4, 660--670. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Hou, Y., Hamamura, M., and Zhang, S. 2005. Performance tradeoff with adaptive frame length and modulation in wireless network. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer and Information Technology. 490--494. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Korhonen, J. and Wang, Y. 2005. Effect of packet size on loss rate and delay in wireless links. In Proceedings of the IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference. 1608--1613.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Modiano, E. 1999. An adaptive algorithm for optimizing the packet size used in wireless arq protocols. Wirel. Netw. 5, 279--286. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. MoteIV. 2007. Tmote Sky data sheet. www.moteiv.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Panichpapiboon, S., Ferrari, G., and Tonguz, O. K. 2005. Optimal common transmit power in ad hoc wireless networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Performance, Computing, and Communications Conference. 593--597.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Proakis, J. 2001. Digital Communications. McGraw-Hill.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Rodoplu, V. and Meng, T. 1999. Minimum energy mobile wireless networks. IEEE J. Select. Areas Comm. 17, 8, 1333--1344. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Sankarasubramaniam, Y., Akyildiz, I. F., and McLaughlin, S. W. 2003. Energy efficiency based packet size optimization in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Sensor Network Protocols and Applications. 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Shin, S. and Schulzrinne, H. 2007. Experimental measurement of the capacity for voip traffic in ieee 802.11 wlans. In Proceedings of the Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (InfoCom). IEEE, 2018--2026.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Vilaipornsawai, U. and Soleymani, M. R. 2003. A novel turbo coding scheme for satellite atm using reed-muller codes. IEEE Trans. Comm. 51, 767--773.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Wang, A., Chao, S., Sodini, C., and Chandrakasan, A. 2001. Energy efficient modulation and mac for asymmetric rf microsensor system. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Low Power Electronics and Design. 106--111. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Optimizing physical-layer parameters for wireless sensor networks

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks
        ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks  Volume 7, Issue 4
        February 2011
        252 pages
        ISSN:1550-4859
        EISSN:1550-4867
        DOI:10.1145/1921621
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2011 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 4 February 2011
        • Accepted: 1 June 2010
        • Revised: 1 April 2009
        • Received: 1 August 2007
        Published in tosn Volume 7, Issue 4

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader