skip to main content
10.1145/1835449.1835603acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Comparing click-through data to purchase decisions for retrieval evaluation

Published:19 July 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

Traditional retrieval evaluation uses explicit relevance judgments which are expensive to collect. Relevance assessments inferred from implicit feedback such as click-through data can be collected inexpensively, but may be less reliable. We compare assessments derived from click-through data to another source of implicit feedback that we assume to be highly indicative of relevance: purchase decisions. Evaluating retrieval runs based on a log of an audio-visual archive, we find agreement between system rankings and purchase decisions to be surprisingly high.

References

  1. S. P. Harter. Variations in relevance assessments and the measurement of retrieval effectiveness. JASIS&T, 47(1):37--49, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. B. Huurnink, L. Hollink, W. van den Heuvel, and M. de Rijke. The search behavior of media professionals at an audiovisual archive: A transaction log analysis. JASIS&T, 2010. DOI: 10.1002/asi.21327. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. T. Joachims, L. Granka, B. Pan, H. Hembrooke, and G. Gay. Accurately interpreting clickthrough data as implicit feedback. In SIGIR '05, pages 154--161, 2005. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. J. Kamps, M. Koolen, and A. Trotman. Comparative analysis of clicks and judgments for IR evaluation. In WSCD '09, pages 80--87, 2009. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. F. Radlinski, M. Kurup, and T. Joachims. How does clickthrough data reflect retrieval quality? In CIKM '08, pages 43--52, 2008. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. I. Ruthven. Integrating approaches to relevance. New directions in cognitive information retrieval, pages 61--80, 2005. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Comparing click-through data to purchase decisions for retrieval evaluation

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGIR '10: Proceedings of the 33rd international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval
      July 2010
      944 pages
      ISBN:9781450301534
      DOI:10.1145/1835449

      Copyright © 2010 Copyright is held by the owner/author(s)

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 19 July 2010

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • poster

      Acceptance Rates

      SIGIR '10 Paper Acceptance Rate87of520submissions,17%Overall Acceptance Rate792of3,983submissions,20%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader