skip to main content
10.1145/1753326.1753423acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Who's hogging the bandwidth: the consequences of revealing the invisible in the home

Authors Info & Claims
Published:10 April 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

As more technologies enter the home, householders are burdened with the task of digital housekeeping-managing and sharing digital resources like bandwidth. In response to this, we created and evaluated a domestic tool for bandwidth management called Home Watcher. Our field trial showed that when resource contention amongst different household members is made visible, people's understanding of bandwidth changes and household politics are revealed. In this paper, we describe the consequences of showing real time resource usage in a home, and how this varies depending on the social make up of the household.

References

  1. Aggarwal, B., Bhagwan, R., Das, T., Eswaran, S., Padmanabhan, V.N. and Voelker, G.M. NetPrints: Diagnosing home network misconfigurations using shared knowledge NSDI: 6th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation, ACM, Boston, Massachusetts, USA, 2009, 349--364. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Chetty, M., Sung, J. and Grinter, R.E. How smart homes learn: The evolution of the networked home and household Ubicomp 2007, Springer-Verlag, Innsbruck, Austria, 2007, 242--251. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Dischinger, M., Gummadi, K.P., Haeberlen, A. and Saroiu, S. Characterizing residential broadband networks Internet Measurement Conference 07, ACM, San Diego, CA, USA, 2007, 43--56. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Ganley, P. and Allgrove, B., "Regulating the Internet: Net neutrality: A user's guide," Computer Law & Security Report 22 (2006), 454--463.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Grinter, R.E., Edwards, W.K., Chetty, M., Poole, E.S., Sung, J.-Y., Yang, J., Crabtree, A., Tolmie, P., Rodden, T., Greenhalgh, C. and Benford, S., "The ins and outs of home networking: The case for useful and usable domestic networking," TOCHI 16, 2 (2009). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Grinter, R.E., Edwards, W.K., Newman, M.W. and Ducheneaut, N. The work to make the home network work ECSCW, Springer Netherlands, Paris, France, 2005, 469--488 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Kwok, T.C., "Residential broadband internet services and applications requirements : Residential broadband services and networks," IEEE Communications 35, 6 (1997), 76--83. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Lakshminarayan, K., Padmanabhan, V.N. and Padhye, J. Bandwidth estimation in broadband access networks Internet Measurement Conference 2004, ACM, Taormina, Sicily, Italy., 2004, 314--321. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. March, W. and Fleuriot, C. Girls, technology and privacy: "Is my mother listening?" CHI 2006, ACM, Montreal, Canada, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. O'Brien, J. and Rodden, T. Interactive systems in domestic environments. DIS '97, ACM, 1997, 247--259. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Ofcom, UK broadband speeds 2009: Consumers' experience of fixed-line broadband performance, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Plaisant, C., Clamage, A., Hutchinson, H.B., Bederson, B.B. and Druin, A., "Shared family calendars: Promoting symmetry and accessibility," ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact 13, 3 (2006), 313--346. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Poole, E.S., Chetty, M., Grinter, R.E. and Edwards, W.K. More than meets the eye: Transforming the user experience of home network management DIS, ACM, Cape Town, South Africa, 2008, 455--464. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Raento, M. and Oulasvirta, A., "Designing for privacy and self presentation in social awareness," Pers. Ubiquit. Comput. 12 (2008), 527--542. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Shehan, E. and Edwards, W.K. Home networking and HCI: What hath God wrought? CHI 2007, ACM, San Jose, California, 2007, 547--556 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Strauss, A. and Corbin, J., Basics of Qualitative Research. Sage Publications Newbury Park, California, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Taylor, A.S. and Swan, L. Artful systems in the home CHI 2005, ACM, 2005, 641--650. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Tolmie, P., Crabtree, A., Rodden, T., Greenhalgh, C. and Benford, S. Making the home network at home: Digital housekeeping ECSCW, Springer-Verlag, 2007, 331--350.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. UK Govt, Digital Britain Final Report. Department for Culture, Media and Sport and Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Who's hogging the bandwidth: the consequences of revealing the invisible in the home

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '10: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2010
      2690 pages
      ISBN:9781605589299
      DOI:10.1145/1753326

      Copyright © 2010 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 10 April 2010

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader