skip to main content
column

Energy proportionality for storage: impact and feasibility

Published:12 March 2010Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

This paper highlights the growing importance of storage energy consumption in a typical data center, and asserts that storage energy research should drive towards a vision of energy proportionality for achieving significant energy savings. Our analysis of real-world enterprise workloads shows a potential energy reduction of 40-75% using an ideally proportional system. We then present a preliminary analysis of appropriate techniques to achieve proportionality, chosen to match both application requirements and workload characteristics. Based on the techniques we have identified, we believe that energy proportionality is achievable in storage systems at a time scale that will make sense in real world environments.

References

  1. Intel Pentium 4 Processor on 90 nm Process, 2005. http://download.intel.com/design/Pentium4/datashts/3056103.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Intel Xeon Processor 5500 Series, 2009. http://www.intel.com/Assets/PDF/Prodbrief/xeon-5500.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Is storage top energy hog in data centers? http://searchstorage.techtarget.com/news/article/0,289142,sid5_gci1285060,00.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. M. Allalouf, Y. Arbitman, M. Factor, R. Kat, K. Meth, and D. Naor. Storage Modeling for Power Estimation. In ACM SYSTOR, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. L.A. Barroso and U. Hlzle. The Case for Energy-Proportional Computing. IEEE Computer, 40(12), 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. T. Burd, T. Pering, A. Stratakos, and R. Brodersen. A Dynamic Voltage-Scaled Microprocessor System. In IEEE ISSCC, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. D. Colarelli and D. Grunwald. Massive Arrays of Idle Disks for Storage Archives. In SC, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. S. Gurumurthiy, A. Sivasubramaniamy, M. Kandemiry, and H. Frankez. DRPM: dynamic speed control for power management in server class disks. In 13th ISCA, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. D. Narayanan, A. Donnelly, and A. Rowstron. Write Off-Loading: Practical Power Management for Enterprise Storage. In 6th FAST, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. D. Narayanan, A. Donnelly, E. Thereska, S. Elnikety, and A. Rowstron. Everest: Scaling down peak loads through I/O off-loading. In 8th FAST, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. A.E. Papathanasiou and M.L. Scott. Energy Efficient Prefetching and Caching. In USENIX, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. E. Pinheiro and R. Bianchini. Energy conservation techniques for disk array-based servers. In 18th ICS, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. D. Reinsel. The Real Costs to Power and Cool All the World's External Storage. In IDC Report, Doc 212714, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. G. Schulz. Storage Industry Trends and IT Infrastructure Resource Management (IRM), 2007. http://www.storageio.com/DownloadItems/CMG/MSP_CMG_May03_2007.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Seagate Technology. Seagate's Sound Barrier Technology (SBT). http://www.seagate.com/docs/pdf/whitepaper/sound_barrier.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. N. Tolia, Z. Wang, M. Marwah, C. Bash, P. Ranganathan, and X. Zhu. Delivering Energy Proportionality with Non Energy-Proportional Systems-Optimizing the Ensemble. In USENIX HotPower, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. C. Weddle, M. Oldham, J. Qian, A.-I. A. Wang, P. Reiher, and G. Kuenning. PARAID: A Gear-Shifting Power-Aware RAID. In 5th FAST, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Q. Zhu, F.M. David, C.F. Devaraj, Z. Li, Y. Zhou, and P. Cao. Reducing Energy Consumption of Disk Storage Using Power-Aware Cache Management. In 10th HPCA, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Q. Zhu, Z. Chen, L. Tan, Y. Zhou, K. Keeton, and J. Wilkes. Hibernator: helping disk arrays sleep through the winter. In 20th ACM SOSP, volume 39, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Energy proportionality for storage: impact and feasibility
                Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

                Recommendations

                Comments

                Login options

                Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                Sign in

                Full Access

                • Published in

                  cover image ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review
                  ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review  Volume 44, Issue 1
                  January 2010
                  115 pages
                  ISSN:0163-5980
                  DOI:10.1145/1740390
                  Issue’s Table of Contents

                  Copyright © 2010 Copyright is held by the owner/author(s)

                  Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

                  Publisher

                  Association for Computing Machinery

                  New York, NY, United States

                  Publication History

                  • Published: 12 March 2010

                  Check for updates

                  Qualifiers

                  • column

                PDF Format

                View or Download as a PDF file.

                PDF

                eReader

                View online with eReader.

                eReader