skip to main content
10.1145/1658978.1658996acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesconextConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Shared versus separate networks: the impact of reprovisioning

Published:01 December 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

As networks improve and new services emerge, questions arise that affect service deployments and network choices. The Internet is arguably a successful example of a network shared by many services. However, combining heterogeneous services on the same network need not always be the right answer, and technologies such as virtualization make deploying new services on separate networks increasingly more viable. So, which is the right option? The question is not unique to networks, and there is a large body of work in the manufacturing systems literature that explores the trade-off between flexible and dedicated plants. This paper highlights an important feature missing from these earlier works, namely, the ability to ``reprovision'' resources in response to changes in demand. It demonstrates that this feature alone can affect the choice of network solutions, and argues for models that incorporate it.

References

  1. E. K. Bish, A. Muriel, and S. Biller. Managing flexible capacity in a make-to-order environment. Management Science, 51(2):167--180, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. C. H. Fine and R. M. Freund. Optimal investment in product-flexible manufacturing capacity. Management Science, 36(4):449--465, 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. S. C. Graves and B. T. Tomlin. Process flexibility in supply chains. Management Science, 49(7):907--919, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. W. C. Jordan and S. C. Graves. Principles of the benefits of manufacturing process flexibility. Management Science, 41(4):577--594, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. J. A. Van Mieghem. Investment strategies for flexible resources. Management Science, 44(8):1071--1078, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. L. Peterson, S. Shenker, and J. Turner. Overcoming the Internet impasse through virtualization. In Proc. ACM HotNets-III, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. J. Touch, Y. Wang, L. Eggert, and G. Finn. A virtual Internet architecture. In Proc. ACM FDNA'03, Karlsruhe, Germany, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Shared versus separate networks: the impact of reprovisioning

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        ReArch '09: Proceedings of the 2009 workshop on Re-architecting the internet
        December 2009
        88 pages
        ISBN:9781605587493
        DOI:10.1145/1658978

        Copyright © 2009 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 1 December 2009

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader