skip to main content
10.1145/1640233.1640271acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesc-n-cConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Local issues, local uses: tools for robotics and sensing in community contexts

Published:26 October 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper describes six creativity support tools we developed to foster community engagement and expression with robotics and sensing, assessing the benefits and shortcomings of each tool. From the descriptions of these tools and their uses, we highlight two issues. The first is the challenge of, and a general strategy for, enabling informed speculation with unfamiliar technologies. The second issue is that in enabling such speculation, the research process is opened to significant shifts in trajectory. These shifts concomitantly serve as markers of technological fluency and challenge the research project, reinforcing the value of a community co-design approach.

References

  1. Arias, E. G.,&Fischer, G. Boundary objects: Their role in articulating the task at hand and making information relevant to it. In Proc. International ICSC Symposium on Interactive&Collaborative Computing 2002 (2002), 567--574.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Banaji, S, Burn, A and Buckingham, D . The Rhetorics of Creativity: A Review of the Literature. London: Arts Council England, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Barad, S. and Squire, K. Design-Based Research: Putting a Stake in The Ground, Journal of The Learning Sciences 13, 1 (2004), 1--14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Barron, B., Martin, C.,&Roberts, E. Sparking self-sustained learning: Lessons from a design experiment to build technological fluency and bridge divides. International Journal of Technology and Design, 17, 1 (2006), 75--105. .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Beck, E. P for Political-Participation Not Enough. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 14, (2002), 77--92.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Beyer, B. K. Critical thinking: What is it? Social Education, 49 (1985), 270--276.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Brandt, E. Designing exploratory design games: a framework for participation in Participatory Design? in PDC'06, ACM Press (2006), 57--66. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Bruner, J. The Culture of Education. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Burke, J., Estrin, D., Hansen, M., Parker, A., Ramanathan, N., Reddy, S., and Srivanstava, N. B. Participatory Sensing in Proc of World Sensor Web Workshop online: http://www.sensor planet.org/wsw2006/6_Burke_wsw06_ucla_final.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Büscher, M., Eriksen, M. A., Kristensen, J. F., and Mogensen, P. H. 2004. Ways of grounding imagination. In Proc PDC '04, ACM Press (2004), 193--203. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Campbell, A. T., Eisenman, S. B., Lane, N. D., Miluzzo, E., and Peterson, R. People-Centric Urban Sensing. In Proc. of ACM/IEEE Annual International Wireless Internet Conference, ACM Press (2006), Article No. 18. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Carroll, J. M. Community computing as human-computer interaction. Behaviour and Information Technology 20, 5 (2001), 307--314.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Cuff, D., M. Hansen, J. Kang. Urban sensing: out of the woods. Commun. ACM 51, 3 (2008) ,24--33. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. DiSalvo, C. Nourbakhsh, I., Holstius, D., Akin, A. and Louw, M. The Neighborhood Networks Project: A Case Study of Critical Engagement and Creative Expression Through Participatory Design In Proc of PDC'08, ACM Press (2008), 41--50. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Dunne, A. and Raby, F. Design Noir: The Secret Life of Electronic Objects. Birkhäuser Basel, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Ehn, P. Participation in Design Things, in Proc of PDC'08, ACM Press (2008), 41--50. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Fallman, D. Design-oriented human-computer interaction. In Proc CHI '03, ACM Press (2003), 225--232. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Findeli, A. ed. Special Issue on Design Research Design Issues, 15, 2, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Fischer, G. "External and Sharable Artifacts as Sources for Social Creativity in Communities of Interest." In Gero, J. S.&Maher, L. M. (eds.) Computational and Cognitive Models of Creative Design V. (2001) 67--89.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Fischer, G. Distances and Diversity: Sources for Social Creativity in Proc. of C&C'05, ACM Press (2005), 128--136. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Fischer, G. End-User Development and Meta-Design: Foundations for Cultures of Participation. In Proc. of the Second International Symposium on End User Development, Springer Berlin (2009), 3--14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Freire, P. Education for a Critical Consciousness. Continuum International: New York. 2005Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Giaccardi, E. and Fischer, G. Creativity and Evolution: A Metadesign Perspective. Digital Creativity 19, 1 (2008), 19--32.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Gurstein, M. Community Informatics: enabling communities with information and communications technologies. Idea Group, Hershey, PA, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Hall, R. Developing forms of Democratic Evaluation. Interrupt Symposium: Artist as Educator (Birmingham UK, March 2003) Arts Council England, http://interrupt.org.uk/symposia/educator/democratic-evaluation/ Accessed April 23, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Hirsch, N. TripWire.http://web.media.mit.edu/tad/htm/tripwire.html. Accessed April 23, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Jenkins, H., Confronting The Challenges of Participatory Culture. http://digitallearning.macfound.org/atf/cf/%7B7E45C7E0-A3E0-4B89-AC9CE807E1B0AE4E%7D/JENKINS_ WHITE_PAPER.PDF. Accessed April 23, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Jennings, P. Giaccadi, E., and Wesolkowsaka. M. About Face: Creative engagements and new media art in HCI. Ext. Abstracts of CHI '06, ACM Press (2006) 1663--1666. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Jeremijenko, N. Feral Robot Dogs. www.nyu.edu/projects/xdesign/feralrobots/. Accessed April 23, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Kester, G. Conversation Pieces, University of California Press, Berkeley: CA, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Kinberg, T., Chalmers, M., and Paulos., E., (eds.). Urban Computing. Pervasive Computing 38, 12 (special issue on urban computing) 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Jeremijenko, N. Feral Robot Dogs. http:// www.nyu.edu/projects/xdesign/feralrobots/. Accessed April 23, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Lievrouw, L. 2006. Oppositional and activist new media: remediation, reconfiguration, participation. In Proc. of PDC'06, ACM Press (2006), 115--124. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Light, A. and Luckin, R. Designing for Social Justice: People, Technology and Learning. FutureLab: Bristol, UK (2008) http://futurelab.org.uk/resources/ documents/opening_education/Designing_for_Social_Justice.pdf. Accessed April 23, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Loi, D 2007, 'Reflective Probes, Primitive Probes and Playful Triggers', EPIC07 - Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference, 3-6 October, Keystone CO. 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Loveless, A. A Literature Review in Creativity, New Technologies and Learning. Futurelab: Bristol, UK (2002) www.futurelab.org.uk/litreviews. Accessed April 23, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Montuori, A. and Purser, R. E. Social Creativity. Hampton Press, Cresskill, NJ. 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. National-Research-Council. Beyond Productivity: Information Technology, Innovation, and Creativity, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Paulos, P. Honicky, R. J. and Ben Hooker. Citizen Science: Enabling Participatory Urbanism in Forth, M. (ed.) Handbook of Research on Urban Informatics: The Practice and Promise of the Real-Time City. Hershey, PA, 2009Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Preemptive Media, AIR. http://pm-air.net. Accessed April 23, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Resnick, L. B., Levine, J. M., and Teasley, S. D. Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C. 1991Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Rusk, N., Resnick, M., Berg, R., and Pezella-Granlund, M. New Pathways into Robotics: Strategies for Broadening Participation, Journal of Science Education and Technology 17, 1 (2008), 59--69.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Sanders, E. and Stappers, P. J. Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign 4, 1 (2008), 5--18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Scardamalia, M. Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In Smith, B. and Bereiter. C. (eds.) Liberal Education in a Knowledge Society, Eds. Open Court: Chicago, 2002. 68--98Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Shaffer, D. and Resnick, M. "Thick" authenticity: new media and authentic learning. Journal of Interactive Learning Research.10, 2 (1999), 195--215. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Schön, D. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Basic Books, New York, 1983.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Shneiderman, B., et. al.. Creativity Support Tools Report from a U.S. National Science Foundation Sponsored Workshop, (Washington, DC., June 2005) http://www.cs.umd.edu/hcil/CST/report.html Accessed April 23, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Warr, A.&O'Neill, E. Getting Creative with Participatory Design, in Proc. of PDC'04, ACM Press (2004), 57--61.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Warr, A. and O'Neill, E. Understanding design as a social creative process, in Proc. of C&C'05 (London, UK, April 2005), ACM Press (2005), 118--127. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Warr, A. and O'Neill, E. Tool support for creativity using externalizations, in Proc. of C&C '07, ACM Press, (2007) 127--136. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Vass, M., Carroll, J. M., and Shaffer, C. A. Supporting creativity in problem solving environments, in Proc. of C&C'02, ACM Press (2002), 31--37. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Watson, E. Who or What Creates? A Conceptual Framework for Social Creativity. Human Resource Development Review, 6, 4 (2007) 419--441.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Local issues, local uses: tools for robotics and sensing in community contexts

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      C&C '09: Proceedings of the seventh ACM conference on Creativity and cognition
      October 2009
      520 pages
      ISBN:9781605588650
      DOI:10.1145/1640233

      Copyright © 2009 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 26 October 2009

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate108of371submissions,29%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader