ABSTRACT
We present a new survey metric, the Creativity Support Index (CSI) that is designed to help researchers and designers evaluate the level of creativity support provided by various systems or interfaces. We initially employed a top-down literature-based approach to develop a beta version of the Creativity Support Index (Beta CSI). We discuss our usage of the Beta CSI in three different studies and what we learned from those deployments. We also present the results from an extensive creativity vocabulary study (n=300), which revealed a set of orthogonal creativity factors. This led to the current version of the CSI presented in this paper. Initial results from these formative evaluations suggest the value of this tool in assessing and comparing creativity support tools at points in time and longitudinally.
- T. M. Amabile. The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2):357--376, 1983.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Amazon. Amazon Mechanical Turk, 2009.Google Scholar
- M. Csikszentmihalyi. Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention. Harper Perrennial, 1997.Google Scholar
- R. Fung, E. Lank, M. Terry, and C. Latulipe. Kinematic templates: End-user tools for content-relative cursor manipulations. In Proceedings of ACM UIST 2008, 2008. Google ScholarDigital Library
- L. Goldberg. A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In I. Mervielde, I. Deary, F.D. Fruyt, and F. Ostendorf, editors, Personality Psychology in Europe, volume 7, pages 7--28. Tilburg University Press, Tillburg, The Netherlands, 1999.Google Scholar
- S. G. Hart, M. E. Childress, and J.R. Hauser. Individual definitions of the term "workload." In Eighth Symposium on Psychology in the Department Of Defense, pages 478--485, 1982.Google Scholar
- S. G. Hart and L. Staveland. Development of the NASA TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. Human Mental Workload, pages 239--250, 1988.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. J. Howe. Genius Explained, chapter Inventing and Discovering, pages 176--187. Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom, 2000.Google Scholar
- C. Hutt. Exploration and play in children. In Play, exploration, and territory in mammals, volume 18, pages 61--68, London, 1966.Google Scholar
- C. Latulipe, I. Bell, C. L. Clarke, and C. S. Kaplan. symTone: Two-handed manipulation of tone reproduction curves. In GI 2006 Proceedings, 2006. Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. Mandryk. Objectiely evaluating entertainment technology. In CHI'04, pages 1057--1058. ACM Press, 2003. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Montessori. The Absorbent Mind. Henry Holt and Company, 1995.Google Scholar
- R. S. Nickerson. Enhancing creativity. In R. J. Sternberg, editor, Handbook of Creativity, pages 392--430. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 1999.Google Scholar
- C. C Preston and A. M. Colman. Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences. Acta Psychologica, 104(1):1--15, 2000.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Read, S. MacFarlane, and C. Casey. Endurability, engagement, and expectations: Measuring children's fun. In IDC '02, volume 53--64. Shake Publishing, 2002.Google Scholar
- K Rubin, G. Fein, and B. Vandenburg. Play. In P. Mussen and E. Hetherington, editors, Handbook of Child Psychology, pages 693--774. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Wiley, New York, 1983.Google Scholar
- B. Schneiderman, G. Fischer, M. Czcerwinski, B. Meyers, and M. Resnik. Creativity support tools: Report from a US National Science Foundation sponsored workshop. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 20(2):61--67, 2006.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Creativity factor evaluation: towards a standardized survey metric for creativity support
Recommendations
Evaluating Creativity Support Tools in HCI Research
DIS '20: Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems ConferenceThe design and development of Creativity Support Tools (CSTs) is of growing interest in research at the intersection of creativity and Human-Computer Interaction, and has been identified as a 'grand challenge for HCI'. While creativity research and HCI ...
Quantifying the Creativity Support of Digital Tools through the Creativity Support Index
Creativity support tools help people engage creatively with the world, but measuring how well a tool supports creativity is challenging since creativity is ill-defined. To this end, we developed the Creativity Support Index (CSI), which is a ...
Creativity Support Tools and Convergent Thinking: A Preliminary Review on Idea Evaluation and Selection
C&C '23: Proceedings of the 15th Conference on Creativity and CognitionCreativity Support Tools (CSTs) have grown exponentially in the HCI field. However, this growth has always leaned towards divergent thinking, thus neglecting convergent thinking. We confirm this information based on a preliminary review between 2012 and ...
Comments