Robert Villa
Hideo Joho
ABSTRACT
With the increasing importance of search systems on the web, there is a continuing push to design interfaces which are a better match with the kinds of real-world tasks in which users are engaged. In this paper, we consider how broad, complex search tasks may be supported via the search interface. In particular, we consider search tasks which may be composed of multiple aspects, or multiple related subtasks. For example, in decision making tasks the user may investigate multiple possible solutions before settling on a single, final solution, while other tasks, such as report writing, may involve searching on multiple interrelated topics.
A search interface is presented which is designed to support such broad search tasks, allowing a user to create search aspects, each of which models an independent subtask of some larger task. The interface is built on the intuition that users should be able to structure their searching environment when engaged on complex search tasks, where the act of structuring and organization may aid the user in understanding his or her task. A user study was carried out which compared our aspectual interface to a standard web-search interface. The results suggest that an aspectual interface can aid users when engaged in broad search tasks where the search aspects must be identified during searching; for a task where search aspects were pre-defined, no advantage over the baseline was found. Results for a decision making task were less clear cut, but show some evidence for improved task performance.
- Bell, D.J., and Ruthven, I. 2004. Searchers' Assessments of Task Complexity for Web Searching. In ECIR 2004, Sunderland, UK, 57--71.Google Scholar
- Borlund, P. 2003. The IIR Evaluation Model: a Framework for Evaluation of Interactive Information Retrieval Systems. In Information Research, 8, 3, paper no. 152.Google Scholar
- Bystrom, K. and Kalervo, J. 1995. Task Complexity Affects Information Seeking and Use. In Information Processing and Management, 2, 191--213. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Campbell, D. J. 1988 Task Complexity: A Review and Analysis. In Academy of Management Review, 13, 1, 40--52.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cutting, D., Karger, D., Pedersen, J., and Tukey, J.W. 1992. Scatter/Gather: A Cluster-based Approach to Browsing Large Document Collections. In SIGIR 1992. Copenhagen, Denmark. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fujima, J., Lunzer, A., Hornbæk, K., and Tanaka, Y. 2004. Clip, Connect, Clone: Combining Application Elements to Build Custom Interfaces for Information Access. In UIST 2004, New York, NY, USA. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hearst, M. 2000. Next Generation Web Search: Setting our Sites. In IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin, 23, 3, 38--48.Google Scholar
- Hersh, W., and Over, P. 2000. TREC-8 Interactive Track Report. In the 18th Text REtrieval Conference (TREC 8), Gaithersburg, MD, USA.Google Scholar
- Ingwersen, P. 1992 Information Retrieval Interaction. London: Taylor Graham. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kaki, M. 2004. Proportional Search Interface Usability Measures. In NordiCHI'04, Tampere, Finland. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lakoff, G. 1985. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Lund A.M. 2001. Measuring Usability with the USE Questionnaire. In Usability and User Experience, 8, 2.Google Scholar
- Lunzer, A., and Hornbæk, K. 2008. Subjunctive Interfaces: Extending Applications to Support Parallel Setup, Viewing and Control of Alternative Scenarios. In ACM Transactions on Computer Human Interaction 14, 4, 1--44. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marchionini, G. 2006. Exploratory Search: From Finding to Understanding. In Communications of the ACM, 49, 4, 41--46. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marchionini, G., and Brunk, B. 2003. Toward a General Relation Browser: A GUI for Information Architects. In Journal of Digital Information, 4, 1.Google Scholar
- Schraefel, M.C., Wilson, M., Russell, A., and Smith, D.A. 2006. mSpace: Improving Information Access to Multimedia Domains with Multimodal Exploratory Search. In Communications of the ACM, 49, 4, 47--49. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Over, P. 1999. TREC-5 Interactive Track Report. In the 7th Text REtrieval Conference (TREC 7), Gaithersburg, MD, USA.Google Scholar
- Vakkari, P. 1999. Task Complexity, Problem Structure and Information Actions: Integrating Studies on Information Seeking and Retrieval Information In Processing and Management, 35, 819--837. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Villa, R., Gildea, N. and Jose, J.M. 2008 FacetBrowser: a user interface for complex search tasks. In proceedings of ACM Multimedia 2008, 489--498. Google ScholarDigital Library
- White, R.W., Kules, B., Drucker, S.M. and Schraefel, M.C. 2006. Supporting Exploratory Search. In Communications of the ACM, 49, 4, 36--39. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- An aspectual interface for supporting complex search tasks
Recommendations
Supporting Complex Search Tasks
CIKM '14: Proceedings of the 23rd ACM International Conference on Conference on Information and Knowledge ManagementWe present methods to automatically identify and recommend sub-tasks to help people explore and accomplish complex search tasks. Although Web searchers often exhibit directed search behaviors such as navigating to a particular Website or locating a ...
Representing Tasks with a Graph-Based Method for Supporting Users in Complex Search Tasks
CHIIR '23: Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Human Information Interaction and RetrievalDespite the considerable advancements in modern search systems for assisting users in search tasks of varying types, support for complex tasks that call for multi-round interactions remains challenging. Identifying users’ tasks is essential to ...
Exploring knowledge graphs for exploratory search
IIiX '14: Proceedings of the 5th Information Interaction in Context SymposiumIn order to provide the user with more support in performing exploratory activities, recent research has been focused on identifying the types of tasks users perform, and understanding the nature of these tasks. However, most of the proposed models ...
Comments