skip to main content
research-article

Artistic rendering of mountainous terrain

Published:08 September 2009Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Panorama maps are aerial view paintings that depict complex, three-dimensional landscapes in a pleasing and understandable way. Painters and cartographers have developed techniques to create such artistic landscapes for centuries, but the process remains difficult and time-consuming. In this work, we derive principles and heuristics for panorama map creation of mountainous terrain from a perceptual and artistic analysis of two panorama maps of Yellowstone National Park. We then present methods to automatically produce landscape renderings in the visual style of the panorama map. Our algorithms rely on United States Geological Survey (USGS) terrain and classification data. Our surface textures are generated using perceptual metrics and artistic considerations, and use the structural information present in the terrain to guide the automatic placement of image space strokes for natural surfaces such as forests, cliffs, snow, and water.

References

  1. Aloimonos, J. 1988. Shape from texture. Biol. Cyber. 58, 345--360. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Board, C. 1990. Report on the working group on cartographic definitions. Cartog. J. 29, 65--69.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Buchin, K., Sousa, M. C., Dollner, J., Samavati, F., and Walther, M. 2004. Illustrating terrains using direction of slope and lighting. In Proceedings of the 4th ICA Mountain Cartography Workshop.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Cabral, B. and Leedom, L. C. 1993. Imaging vector fields using line integral convolution. In Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (SIGGRAPH). ACM Press, 263--270. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Da Vinci, L. 2003. The Notebooks of Leonardo Da Vinci. Konecky, William S. Associates, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. DeCarlo, D. and Santella, A. 2002. Stylization and abstraction of photographs. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (SIGGRAPH). ACM Press, 769--776. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Deussen, O., Hamel, J., Raab, A., Schlechtweg, S., and Strothotte, T. 1999. An illustration technique using hardware-based intersections and skeletons. In Proceedings of the Conference on Graphics Interface. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., 175--182. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Dorling, D. and Fairbairn, D. 1997. Mapping ways of representing the world. In Insights into Human Geography. Addison Wesley Longman.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Elber, G. 1998. Line art illustrations of parametric and implicit forms. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 4, 1, 71--81. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Garding, J. 1993. Shape from texture and contour by weak isotropy. J. Artif. Intell. 64, 243--297. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Gibson, J. J. 1950. The Perception of the Visual World. Riverside Press, Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Gooch, A., Gooch, B., Shirley, P., and Cohen, E. 1998. A non-photorealistic lighting model for automatic technical illustration. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (SIGGRAPH), 447--452. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Haeberling, C. 2004. Selected design aspects and graphic variables for 3D mountain maps. In Proceedings of the 4th Mountain Cartography Workshop. Vol. 8. Monografies tecniques, 109--118.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Hertzmann, A. 1998. Painterly rendering with curved brush strokes of multiple sizes. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (SIGGRAPH). ACM Press, 453--460. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Hertzmann, A. and Zorin, D. 2000. Illustrating smooth surfaces. Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (SIGGRAPH '00). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Horn, B. 1981. Hill shading and the reflectance map. Proc. IEEE 23, 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Hsu, S. C., Lee, I. H. H., and Wiseman, N. E. 1993. Skeletal strokes. In Proceedings of the 6th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST). ACM Press, 197--206. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Imhof, E. 1963. Zurich, Vorhof der Alpen. Chapter Zurcher Kartenkustler und Panoramazeichner, 105--138.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Imhof, E. 1982. Cartographic Relief Presentation. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Interrante, V. 1997. Illustrating surface shape in volume data via principal direction-driven 3D line integral convolution. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (SIGGRAPH). ACM Press, 109--116. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Knill, D. 1992. Perception of surface contours and surface shape: From computation to psychophysics. J. Opt. Soc. Amer. A 9, 9, 1449--1464.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Koenderink, J. J. and van Doorn, A. J. 1998. The structure of relief. Advances Imag. Elect. Physics 103, 65--150.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Lesage, P. L. and Visvalingam, M. 2002. Towards sketch-based exploration of terrain. Comput. Graph. 26, 309--328.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Leung, T. and Malik, J. 1997. On perpendicular texture or: Why do we see more flowers in the distance? In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 807--813. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Malik, J. and Rosenholtz, R. 1997. Computing local surface orientation and shape from texture for curved surfaces. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 23, 2, 149--168. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Marr, D. A. 1982. Vision. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Palmer, S. 1999. Vision Science---Photons to Phenomenology. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Patterson, T. 2000. A view from on high: Heinrich Berann's panoramas and landscape visualization techniques for the US national park service. Cartog. Persp. 36.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Patterson, T. 2005. Looking closer: A guide to making bird's-eye views of national park service cultural and historical sites. Cartog. Persp. 52.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Premoze, S. 2002. Computer generation of panorama maps. In Proceedings of the 3rd ICA Mountain Cartography Workshop.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Reinhard, E., Ashikhmin, M., Gooch, B., and Shirley, P. 2001. Color transfer between images. Comput. Graph. Appl. 2--9. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Rosenholtz, R. and Malik, J. 1997. Surface orientation from texture: Isotropy or homogeneity (or both)? Vis. Res. 37, 16, 2283--2293.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Rusinkiewicz, S., Burns, M., and DeCarlo, D. 2006. Exaggerated shading for depicting shape and detail. In Proceedings of the 33th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (SIGGRAPH). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Saito, T. and Takahashi, T. 1990. Comprehensible rendering of 3-D shapes. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (SIGGRAPH). Vol. 24. 197--206. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Salisbury, M., Wong, M., Hughes, J., and Salesin, D. 1997. Orientable textures for image-based pen-and-ink illustration. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (SIGGRAPH). ACM Press, 401--406. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Saunders, J. A. 2003. The effect of texture relief on perception of slant from texture. Percep. 32, 211--233.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Stevens, K. 1979. Surface perception from local analysis of texture and contour. Ph.D. thesis, MIT.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Stevens, K. 1981. The visual interpretation of surface contours. J. Artif. Intell. 17, 47--73.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Sullivan, C. 1997. Drawing the Landscape. John Wiley and Sons, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Visvalingam, M. and Dowson, K. 1998. Algorithms for sketching surfaces. Comput. Graph. 9, 213--228.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Whelan, J. and Visvalingam, M. 2003. Formulated silhouettes for sketching terrain. In Theory and Practice of Computer Graphics. IEEE, 90. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Witkin, A. P. 1981. Recovering surface shape and orientation from texture. J. Artif. Intell. 17, 17--45.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Artistic rendering of mountainous terrain

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM Transactions on Graphics
      ACM Transactions on Graphics  Volume 28, Issue 4
      August 2009
      116 pages
      ISSN:0730-0301
      EISSN:1557-7368
      DOI:10.1145/1559755
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2009 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 8 September 2009
      • Accepted: 1 April 2009
      • Revised: 1 May 2008
      • Received: 1 January 2007
      Published in tog Volume 28, Issue 4

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader