skip to main content
10.1145/1555400.1555436acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesjcdlConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Automatically characterizing resource quality for educational digital libraries

Published:15 June 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

With the rise of community-generated web content, the need for automatic characterization of resource quality has grown, particularly in the realm of educational digital libraries. We demonstrate how identifying concrete factors of quality for web-based educational resources can make machine learning approaches to automating quality characterization tractable. Using data from several previous studies of quality, we gathered a set of key dimensions and indicators of quality that were commonly identified by educators. We then performed a mixed-method study of digital library curation experts, showing that our characterization of quality captured the subjective processes used by the experts when assessing resource quality for classroom use. Using key indicators of quality selected from a statistical analysis of our expert study data, we developed a set of annotation guidelines and annotated a corpus of 1000 digital resources for the presence or absence of these key quality indicators. Agreement among annotators was high, and initial machine learning models trained from this corpus were able to identify some indicators of quality with as much as an 18% improvement over the baseline.

References

  1. B. T. Adler and L. de Alfaro. A content-driven reputation system for the wikipedia. In Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web, pages 261--270, Ban, Alberta, Canada, 2007. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. J. E. Blumenstock. Size matters: Word count as a measure of quality on wikipedia. In Proceedings of the 17th International World Wide Web Conference, pages 1095--1096, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. T. Carey and G. L. Hanley. Extending the impact of open educational resources through alignment with pedagogical content knowledge and institutional strategy: Lessons learned from the merlot community experience. In Opening up education: the collective advancement of education through open technology, open content, and open knowledge, chapter 12. MIT Press, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. CLEANEVAL home page. http://cleaneval.sigwac.org.uk/, Oct. 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Climate change collection. http://serc.carleton.edu/climatechange/, Oct. 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. M. Custard and T. Sumner. Using machine learning to support quality judgments. D-Lib Magazine, 11(10), Oct. 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. S. de la Chica. Generating Conceptual Knowledge Representations to Support Students Writing Scientific Explanations. PhD thesis, University of Colorado, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. H. Devaul, A. Diekema, and J. Ostwald. Computer-assisted assignment of educational standards using natural language processing. Unpublished technical report, Digital Learning Sciences, Boulder, CO, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Digital library for earth system education. http://www.dlese.org/, Oct. 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Digital water education library. http://www.csmate.colostate.edu/DWEL/, Jan. 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. DLESE Community Collection (DCC) scope statement. http://www.dlese.org/Metadata/collections/scopes/dcc-scope.php, Oct. 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. P. Dmitriev. As we may perceive: Finding the boundaries of compound documents on the web. In Proceedings of the 17th International World Wide Web Conference, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. D. F. Dufty, D. Mcnamara, M. Louwerse, Z. Cai, and A. C. Graesser. Automatic evaluation of aspects of document quality. In Proceedings of the 22nd annual international conference on Documentation, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. N. Eiron. Untangling compound documents on the web. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia, pages 85--94, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. K. A. Ericsson and H. A. Simon. Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data. The MIT Press, revised edition, Apr. 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. B. J. Fogg, J. Marshall, O. Laraki, A. Osipovich, C. Varma, N. Fang, J. Paul, A. Rangnekar, J. Shon, P. Swani, and M. Treinen. What makes web sites credible?: a report on a large quantitative study. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 61--68, Seattle, Washington, United States, 2001. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. M. Y. Ivory, R. R. Sinha, and M. A. Hearst. Empirically validated web page design metrics. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 53--60, Seattle, Washington, United States, 2001. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. T. Joachims. Making large-scale support vector machine learning practical. In Advances in kernel methods: support vector learning, pages 169--184. MIT Press, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. P. V. Ogren, P. G. Wetzler, and S. Bethard. ClearTK: A UIMA toolkit for statistical natural language processing. In UIMA for NLP workshop at Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC), 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. R. Reitsma, B. Marshall, M. Dalton, and M. Cyr. Exploring educational standard alignment: in search of 'relevance'. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries, pages 57--65, Pittsburgh PA, PA, USA, 2008. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. S. Y. Rieh. Judgment of information quality and cognitive authority in the web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53:145--161, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. T. Sumner, M. Khoo, M. Recker, and M. Marlino. Understanding educator perceptions of "quality" in digital libraries. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries, pages 269--279, Houston, Texas, 2003. IEEE Computer Society. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. H. Zeng, M. Alhossaini, L. Ding, R. Fikes, and D. Mcguinness. Computing trust from revision history. In Proceedings of the 2006 International Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust, Oct. 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. X. Zhu and S. Gauch. Incorporating quality metrics in centralized/distributed information retrieval on the world wide web. In SIGIR '00: Proceedings of the 23rd annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, pages 288--295, New York, NY, USA, 2000. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Automatically characterizing resource quality for educational digital libraries

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Conferences
              JCDL '09: Proceedings of the 9th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries
              June 2009
              502 pages
              ISBN:9781605583228
              DOI:10.1145/1555400

              Copyright © 2009 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 15 June 2009

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • research-article

              Acceptance Rates

              Overall Acceptance Rate415of1,482submissions,28%

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader