skip to main content
10.1145/1553374.1553416acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicmlConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Dynamic mixed membership blockmodel for evolving networks

Published:14 June 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

In a dynamic social or biological environment, interactions between the underlying actors can undergo large and systematic changes. Each actor can assume multiple roles and their degrees of affiliation to these roles can also exhibit rich temporal phenomena. We propose a state space mixed membership stochastic blockmodel which can track across time the evolving roles of the actors. We also derive an efficient variational inference procedure for our model, and apply it to the Enron email networks, and rewiring gene regulatory networks of yeast. In both cases, our model reveals interesting dynamical roles of the actors.

References

  1. Ahmed, A., & Xing, E. P. (2007). On tight approximate inference of logistic-normal admixture model. Artificial Intelligence and Statistics.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Airoldi, E. M., Blei, D. M., Fienberg, S. E., & Xing, E. P. (2008). Mixed-membership stochastic blockmodels. JMLR, 9, 1981--2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Blei, D., & Lafferty, J. (2006a). Correlated topic models. Neural Information Processing Systems.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Blei, D. M., & Lafferty, J. D. (2006b). Dynamic topic models. Intl. Conf. Machine Learning. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Erosheva, E. A., Fienberg, S. E., & Lafferty, J. (2004). Mixed-membership models of scientific publications. PNAS, 97, 11885--11892.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Ghahramani, Z., & Beal, M. (2001). Propagation algorithms for variational Bayesian learning. Neural Information Processing Systems.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Handcock, M. S., Raftery, A. E., & Tantrum, J. M. (2007). Model-based clustering for social networks. J. R. Statist. Soc. A, 170, 1--22.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Hoff, P. D., Raftery, A. E., & Handcock, M. S. (2002). Latent space approaches to social network analysis. J. American Statistical Association, 97, 1090--1098.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Li, W., & McCallum, A. (2006). Pachinko allocation: Dag-structured mixture models of topic correlations. Intl. Conf. Machine Learning. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Luscombe, N., Babu, M., Yu, H., Snyder, M., Teichmann, S., & Gerstein, M. (2004). Genomic analysis of regulatory network dynamics reveals large topological changes. Nature, 431, 308--312.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Shetty, J., & Adibi, J. (2004). The enron email dataset database schema and brief statistical report (Technical Report). Information Sciences Institute, University of Southern California.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Xing, E. P., Jordan, M. I., & Russell, S. (2003). A generalized mean field algorithm for variational inference in exponential families. Uncertainty in AI. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Dynamic mixed membership blockmodel for evolving networks

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          ICML '09: Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference on Machine Learning
          June 2009
          1331 pages
          ISBN:9781605585161
          DOI:10.1145/1553374

          Copyright © 2009 Copyright 2009 by the author(s)/owner(s).

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 14 June 2009

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate140of548submissions,26%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader