skip to main content
10.1145/1536414.1536435acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesstocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

New direct-product testers and 2-query PCPs

Published:31 May 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

The "direct product code" of a function f gives its values on all k-tuples (f(x1),...,f(xk)). This basic construct underlies "hardness amplification" in cryptography, circuit complexity and PCPs. Goldreich and Safra [12] pioneered its local testing and its PCP application. A recent result by Dinur and Goldenberg [5] enabled for the first time testing proximity to this important code in the "list-decoding" regime. In particular, they give a 2-query test which works for polynomially small success probability 1/kα, and show that no such test works below success probability 1/k. Our main result is a 3-query test which works for exponentially small success probability exp(-kα). Our techniques (based on recent simplified decoding algorithms for the same code [15]) also allow us to considerably simplify the analysis of the 2-query test of [5]. We then show how to derandomize their test, achieving a code of polynomial rate, independent of k, and success probability 1/kα. Finally we show the applicability of the new tests to PCPs. Starting with a 2-query PCP over an alphabet Σ and with soundness error 1-δ, Rao [19] (building on Raz's (k-fold) parallel repetition theorem [20] and Holenstein's proof [13]) obtains a new 2-query PCP over the alphabet Σk with soundness error exp(-δ2 k). Our techniques yield a 2-query PCP with soundness error exp(-δ √k). Our PCP construction turns out to be essentially the same as the miss-match proof system defined and analyzed by Feige and Kilian [8], but with simpler analysis and exponentially better soundness error.

References

  1. S. Arora, C. Lund, R. Motwani, M. Sudan, and M. Szegedy. Proof verification and the hardness of approximation problems. JACM, 45(3):501--555, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. S. Arora and S. Safra. Probabilistic checking of proofs: A new characterization of NP. JACM, 45(1):70--122, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. I. Dinur. The PCP theorem by gap amplification. JACM, 54(3), 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. I. Dinur. PCPs with small soundness error. ACM SIGACT News, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. I. Dinur and E. Goldenberg. Locally testing direct products in the low error range. In FOCS'08. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. I. Dinur and O. Reingold. Assignment testers: Towards a combinatorial proof of the PCP theorem. SICOMP, 36(4):975--1024, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. F. Ergun, S. Kannan, R. Kumar, R. Rubinfeld, and M. Viswanathan. Spot-checkers. JCSS, 60(3):717--751, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. U. Feige and J. Kilian. Two-prover protocols -- low error at affordable rates. SICOMP, 30(1):324--346, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. U. Feige and O. Verbitsky. Error reduction by parallel repetition -- A negative result. Combinatorica, 22(4):461--478, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. O. Goldreich and L.A. Levin. A hard-core predicate for all one-way functions. In STOC'89, pages 25--32, 1989. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. O. Goldreich, N. Nisan, and A. Wigderson. On Yao's XOR-Lemma. ECCC, TR95-050, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. O. Goldreich and S. Safra. A combinatorial consistency lemma with application to proving the PCP theorem. SICOMP, 29(4):1132--1154, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. T. Holenstein. Parallel repetition: Simplifications and the no-signaling case. In STOC'07, pages 411--419, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. R. Impagliazzo, R. Jaiswal, and V. Kabanets. Approximately list-decoding direct product codes and uniform hardness amplification. In FOCS'06, pages 187--196, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. R. Impagliazzo, R. Jaiswal, V. Kabanets, and A. Wigderson. Uniform direct-product theorems: Simplified, optimized, and derandomized. In STOC'08, pages 579--588, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. R. Impagliazzo and A. Wigderson. P=BPP if E requires exponential circuits: Derandomizing the XOR Lemma. In STOC'97, pages 220--229, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. L.A. Levin. One-way functions and pseudorandom generators. Combinatorica, 7(4):357--363, 1987. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. D. Moshkovitz and R. Raz. Two query PCP with sub-constant error. In FOCS'08, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. A. Rao. Parallel repetition in projection games and a concentration bound. In STOC'08, pages 1--10, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. R. Raz. A parallel repetition theorem. SICOMP, 27(3):763--803, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. R. Raz. A counterexample to strong parallel repetition. In FOCS'08, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. L. Trevisan. List-decoding using the XOR lemma. In FOCS'03, pages 126--135, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. O. Verbitsky. Towards the parallel repetition conjecture. TCS, 157(2):277--282, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. A.C. Yao. Theory and applications of trapdoor functions. In FOCS'82, pages 80--91, 1982. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. New direct-product testers and 2-query PCPs

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        STOC '09: Proceedings of the forty-first annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing
        May 2009
        750 pages
        ISBN:9781605585062
        DOI:10.1145/1536414

        Copyright © 2009 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 31 May 2009

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate1,469of4,586submissions,32%

        Upcoming Conference

        STOC '24
        56th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 2024)
        June 24 - 28, 2024
        Vancouver , BC , Canada

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader